Relative Mass of Brain- and Intestinal Tissue in Juvenile Brown Trout: No Long-Term Effects of Compensatory Growth; with Additional Notes on Emerging Sex-Differences

This study investigated whether compensatory growth causes long-term effects in relative brain- or intestine size in a wild, predominantly anadromous, population of brown trout (Salmo trutta). The subject fish belonged to two treatment groups; one group had undergone starvation and subsequent growth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joacim Näslund
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Fishes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/3/4/38
id doaj-1d26b42880d540afab488307bb6d26fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d26b42880d540afab488307bb6d26fa2020-11-25T00:57:53ZengMDPI AGFishes2410-38882018-09-013438010.3390/fishes3040038fishes3040038Relative Mass of Brain- and Intestinal Tissue in Juvenile Brown Trout: No Long-Term Effects of Compensatory Growth; with Additional Notes on Emerging Sex-DifferencesJoacim Näslund0Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 463, 405 30 Gothenburg, SwedenThis study investigated whether compensatory growth causes long-term effects in relative brain- or intestine size in a wild, predominantly anadromous, population of brown trout (Salmo trutta). The subject fish belonged to two treatment groups; one group had undergone starvation and subsequent growth compensation, while the other were unrestricted controls. The main hypothesis that compensatory growth would negatively affect brain and intestinal size, as a consequence of growth trade-offs during the compensatory phase, could not be supported as no significant differences were detected between the treatment groups. Further exploratory analyses suggested that males and females started to diverge in both brain and intestine size at around 130 mm fork length, with females developing relatively smaller brains and larger intestines. The size at which the differences appear is a typical size for smoltification (saltwater preadaptation), and females tend to smoltify to a higher proportion than males. Smoltification is known to cause a more elongated morphology and relatively smaller heads in salmonids, and the marine lifestyle is associated with rapid growth, which could require relatively larger intestines. Hence, these emerging sex differences could be a consequence of sex-biased smoltification rates. An investigation of wild smolts of both sexes indicated no differences in brain or intestine mass between male and female smolts.http://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/3/4/38brain sizeintestine sizesalmonidaeontogenygrowth allocationsmoltification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joacim Näslund
spellingShingle Joacim Näslund
Relative Mass of Brain- and Intestinal Tissue in Juvenile Brown Trout: No Long-Term Effects of Compensatory Growth; with Additional Notes on Emerging Sex-Differences
Fishes
brain size
intestine size
salmonidae
ontogeny
growth allocation
smoltification
author_facet Joacim Näslund
author_sort Joacim Näslund
title Relative Mass of Brain- and Intestinal Tissue in Juvenile Brown Trout: No Long-Term Effects of Compensatory Growth; with Additional Notes on Emerging Sex-Differences
title_short Relative Mass of Brain- and Intestinal Tissue in Juvenile Brown Trout: No Long-Term Effects of Compensatory Growth; with Additional Notes on Emerging Sex-Differences
title_full Relative Mass of Brain- and Intestinal Tissue in Juvenile Brown Trout: No Long-Term Effects of Compensatory Growth; with Additional Notes on Emerging Sex-Differences
title_fullStr Relative Mass of Brain- and Intestinal Tissue in Juvenile Brown Trout: No Long-Term Effects of Compensatory Growth; with Additional Notes on Emerging Sex-Differences
title_full_unstemmed Relative Mass of Brain- and Intestinal Tissue in Juvenile Brown Trout: No Long-Term Effects of Compensatory Growth; with Additional Notes on Emerging Sex-Differences
title_sort relative mass of brain- and intestinal tissue in juvenile brown trout: no long-term effects of compensatory growth; with additional notes on emerging sex-differences
publisher MDPI AG
series Fishes
issn 2410-3888
publishDate 2018-09-01
description This study investigated whether compensatory growth causes long-term effects in relative brain- or intestine size in a wild, predominantly anadromous, population of brown trout (Salmo trutta). The subject fish belonged to two treatment groups; one group had undergone starvation and subsequent growth compensation, while the other were unrestricted controls. The main hypothesis that compensatory growth would negatively affect brain and intestinal size, as a consequence of growth trade-offs during the compensatory phase, could not be supported as no significant differences were detected between the treatment groups. Further exploratory analyses suggested that males and females started to diverge in both brain and intestine size at around 130 mm fork length, with females developing relatively smaller brains and larger intestines. The size at which the differences appear is a typical size for smoltification (saltwater preadaptation), and females tend to smoltify to a higher proportion than males. Smoltification is known to cause a more elongated morphology and relatively smaller heads in salmonids, and the marine lifestyle is associated with rapid growth, which could require relatively larger intestines. Hence, these emerging sex differences could be a consequence of sex-biased smoltification rates. An investigation of wild smolts of both sexes indicated no differences in brain or intestine mass between male and female smolts.
topic brain size
intestine size
salmonidae
ontogeny
growth allocation
smoltification
url http://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/3/4/38
work_keys_str_mv AT joacimnaslund relativemassofbrainandintestinaltissueinjuvenilebrowntroutnolongtermeffectsofcompensatorygrowthwithadditionalnotesonemergingsexdifferences
_version_ 1725222358895034368