Can critical inquiry differ from criticism? A dialogue with current occupational science and occupational therapy schools of inquiry
Introduction: Critical inquiry has been adopted by various academic disciplines. However, there is a lack of consistency and transparency in the way this complex theoretical and methodological position is applied in research. For novice researchers that ambiguity can lead to blurring the conceptu...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
2016-07-01
|
| Series: | Cadernos de Terapia Ocupacional |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.cadernosdeterapiaocupacional.ufscar.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/1451/758 |
| Summary: | Introduction: Critical inquiry has been adopted by various academic disciplines. However, there is a
lack of consistency and transparency in the way this complex theoretical and methodological position is applied
in research. For novice researchers that ambiguity can lead to blurring the conceptual distinction between critical
research and the act of criticizing. Objective: The purpose of this essay is to reflect on what it means to keep a
critical perspective for novice researchers. Method: The concepts are explored through a personal narrative that
allows authors to examine the details of their trajectory to embrace a critical perspective, which has the power
to lead to change, both personal and social. Results: We explore the methodological foundations of the critical
research and observe how the emotion is taken over or suppressed in the investigation process. Conclusion: We
contextualize key concepts of critical investigation, examining its recent application both in occupational science
and in occupational therapy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0104-4931 2238-2860 |