The Same Old New Look: Publication Bias in a Study of Wishful Seeing

A recent study reported evidence of “wishful seeing,” where observers reported seeing a desired object as being closer than other objects. A statistical analysis of the experimental findings reveals evidence of publication bias in the study, so the existence of wishful seeing remains unproven.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gregory Francis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-04-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/i0519ic
id doaj-1d1e6c443c0a4c6ab858d590c3411af6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d1e6c443c0a4c6ab858d590c3411af62020-11-25T03:20:53ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952012-04-01310.1068/i0519ic10.1068_i0519icThe Same Old New Look: Publication Bias in a Study of Wishful SeeingGregory FrancisA recent study reported evidence of “wishful seeing,” where observers reported seeing a desired object as being closer than other objects. A statistical analysis of the experimental findings reveals evidence of publication bias in the study, so the existence of wishful seeing remains unproven.https://doi.org/10.1068/i0519ic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gregory Francis
spellingShingle Gregory Francis
The Same Old New Look: Publication Bias in a Study of Wishful Seeing
i-Perception
author_facet Gregory Francis
author_sort Gregory Francis
title The Same Old New Look: Publication Bias in a Study of Wishful Seeing
title_short The Same Old New Look: Publication Bias in a Study of Wishful Seeing
title_full The Same Old New Look: Publication Bias in a Study of Wishful Seeing
title_fullStr The Same Old New Look: Publication Bias in a Study of Wishful Seeing
title_full_unstemmed The Same Old New Look: Publication Bias in a Study of Wishful Seeing
title_sort same old new look: publication bias in a study of wishful seeing
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2012-04-01
description A recent study reported evidence of “wishful seeing,” where observers reported seeing a desired object as being closer than other objects. A statistical analysis of the experimental findings reveals evidence of publication bias in the study, so the existence of wishful seeing remains unproven.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/i0519ic
work_keys_str_mv AT gregoryfrancis thesameoldnewlookpublicationbiasinastudyofwishfulseeing
AT gregoryfrancis sameoldnewlookpublicationbiasinastudyofwishfulseeing
_version_ 1724615938587754496