The Limited Value of Non-Replicable Field Experiments in Contexts With Low Temporal Validity
My first publication as a grad student was a field experiment using Twitter “bots” to socially sanction users engaged in racist harassment. The ascendant paradigm in quantitative social science emphasizes the need for research to be “internally valid,” with a preference for randomized control trials...
Main Author: | Kevin Munger |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Social Media + Society |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119859294 |
Similar Items
-
Value and limitations of intracranial recordings for validating electric field modeling for transcranial brain stimulation
by: Oula Puonti, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Development and validation of non-integrative, self-limited, and replicating minicircles for safe reporter gene imaging of cell-based therapies.
by: John A Ronald, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Motion perception at the limits of the temporal visual field
by: To, Michelle Pui See
Published: (2006) -
Is it reliable and valid if it is not replicable? On the importance of replicability in quantitative research
by: Loreta Vilkienė, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Issues of Non-Compliance and Their Effect on Validity in Field Experiments : A case study of the field experiment “Taxis and Contracts”
by: Arntyr, Johan
Published: (2011)