The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries

The article studies the methods that substantiated the legitimacy of the power of the Russian monarch over the vast territories of Siberia. The context of this study is the Russian political culture of the late 16th to early 18th centuries. Based on information from chronicles as well as diplomatic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrey S. Zuev, Viktoriya A. Slugina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2021-12-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Russian History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/russian-history/article/viewFile/27266/19703
id doaj-1d177c8345c542e08eb108424383eba1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d177c8345c542e08eb108424383eba12021-08-31T08:40:36ZrusPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Russian History2312-86742312-86902021-12-0120334035210.22363/2312-8674-2021-20-3-340-35220357The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuriesAndrey S. Zuev0Viktoriya A. Slugina1Novosibirsk State UniversityInstitute of History SB RASThe article studies the methods that substantiated the legitimacy of the power of the Russian monarch over the vast territories of Siberia. The context of this study is the Russian political culture of the late 16th to early 18th centuries. Based on information from chronicles as well as diplomatic and administrative documents, the authors identify and systematize the main political, ideological, and legal arguments that were most often used by the Russian government to justify the Tsars rule over Siberia. The arguments can be divided into two groups according to the target audience: the first group was intended for conversation with the heads of foreign countries, the second one addressed the Siberian peoples and also the Russian people broadly. In foreign policy, the representatives of the Moscow Tsar emphasized the antiquity and the strength of the bond between these territories and the Russian state. The diplomats tended to exaggerate the scale of the Russian military, socio-economic, political, and cultural (religious) development of the new territories. At the same time, they were silent about the resistance of the local population to the tsarist servicemen. At home the authorities applied other legal arguments to bolster their legitimacy. In interaction with indigenous populations, the Russian governors and service people usually forced the communities (in the form of an ultimatum) to accept the claim that the Tsar owned the Siberian lands as a fiefdom. With this the socio-political status of the Siberian peoples radically changed: they became subjects to the Russian Tsar, as kholops or yasak-payers. The Russian combatants and colonists, in direct contact with the indigenous population, informed the Siberian peoples about recent government directives and fully identified with the official claim to authority. In the eyes of the Russian population, an additional element was the religious and political idea that the Tsar had been chosen by God, from which followed the duty to expand the Russian Orthodox tsardom.http://journals.rudn.ru/russian-history/article/viewFile/27266/19703legitimationtsarmonarchysiberian peoplesrussian statepolitical communication
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrey S. Zuev
Viktoriya A. Slugina
spellingShingle Andrey S. Zuev
Viktoriya A. Slugina
The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries
RUDN Journal of Russian History
legitimation
tsar
monarchy
siberian peoples
russian state
political communication
author_facet Andrey S. Zuev
Viktoriya A. Slugina
author_sort Andrey S. Zuev
title The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries
title_short The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries
title_full The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries
title_fullStr The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries
title_full_unstemmed The legitimacy of Tsarist authority over the peoples of Siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries
title_sort legitimacy of tsarist authority over the peoples of siberia in the late 16th to early 18th centuries
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
series RUDN Journal of Russian History
issn 2312-8674
2312-8690
publishDate 2021-12-01
description The article studies the methods that substantiated the legitimacy of the power of the Russian monarch over the vast territories of Siberia. The context of this study is the Russian political culture of the late 16th to early 18th centuries. Based on information from chronicles as well as diplomatic and administrative documents, the authors identify and systematize the main political, ideological, and legal arguments that were most often used by the Russian government to justify the Tsars rule over Siberia. The arguments can be divided into two groups according to the target audience: the first group was intended for conversation with the heads of foreign countries, the second one addressed the Siberian peoples and also the Russian people broadly. In foreign policy, the representatives of the Moscow Tsar emphasized the antiquity and the strength of the bond between these territories and the Russian state. The diplomats tended to exaggerate the scale of the Russian military, socio-economic, political, and cultural (religious) development of the new territories. At the same time, they were silent about the resistance of the local population to the tsarist servicemen. At home the authorities applied other legal arguments to bolster their legitimacy. In interaction with indigenous populations, the Russian governors and service people usually forced the communities (in the form of an ultimatum) to accept the claim that the Tsar owned the Siberian lands as a fiefdom. With this the socio-political status of the Siberian peoples radically changed: they became subjects to the Russian Tsar, as kholops or yasak-payers. The Russian combatants and colonists, in direct contact with the indigenous population, informed the Siberian peoples about recent government directives and fully identified with the official claim to authority. In the eyes of the Russian population, an additional element was the religious and political idea that the Tsar had been chosen by God, from which followed the duty to expand the Russian Orthodox tsardom.
topic legitimation
tsar
monarchy
siberian peoples
russian state
political communication
url http://journals.rudn.ru/russian-history/article/viewFile/27266/19703
work_keys_str_mv AT andreyszuev thelegitimacyoftsaristauthorityoverthepeoplesofsiberiainthelate16thtoearly18thcenturies
AT viktoriyaaslugina thelegitimacyoftsaristauthorityoverthepeoplesofsiberiainthelate16thtoearly18thcenturies
AT andreyszuev legitimacyoftsaristauthorityoverthepeoplesofsiberiainthelate16thtoearly18thcenturies
AT viktoriyaaslugina legitimacyoftsaristauthorityoverthepeoplesofsiberiainthelate16thtoearly18thcenturies
_version_ 1721183848121761792