The automatic conservative: ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information.

Research has widely explored the differences between conservatives and liberals, and it has been also recently demonstrated that conservatives display different reactions toward valenced stimuli. However, previous studies have not yet fully illuminated the cognitive underpinnings of these difference...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luciana Carraro, Luigi Castelli, Claudia Macchiella
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3212508?pdf=render
id doaj-1d14df73b65c4d1395e3ec2841d15643
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d14df73b65c4d1395e3ec2841d156432020-11-24T21:26:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-01611e2645610.1371/journal.pone.0026456The automatic conservative: ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information.Luciana CarraroLuigi CastelliClaudia MacchiellaResearch has widely explored the differences between conservatives and liberals, and it has been also recently demonstrated that conservatives display different reactions toward valenced stimuli. However, previous studies have not yet fully illuminated the cognitive underpinnings of these differences. In the current work, we argued that political ideology is related to selective attention processes, so that negative stimuli are more likely to automatically grab the attention of conservatives as compared to liberals. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that negative (vs. positive) information impaired the performance of conservatives, more than liberals, in an Emotional Stroop Task. This finding was confirmed in Experiment 2 and in Experiment 3 employing a Dot-Probe Task, demonstrating that threatening stimuli were more likely to attract the attention of conservatives. Overall, results support the conclusion that people embracing conservative views of the world display an automatic selective attention for negative stimuli.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3212508?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luciana Carraro
Luigi Castelli
Claudia Macchiella
spellingShingle Luciana Carraro
Luigi Castelli
Claudia Macchiella
The automatic conservative: ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Luciana Carraro
Luigi Castelli
Claudia Macchiella
author_sort Luciana Carraro
title The automatic conservative: ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information.
title_short The automatic conservative: ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information.
title_full The automatic conservative: ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information.
title_fullStr The automatic conservative: ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information.
title_full_unstemmed The automatic conservative: ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information.
title_sort automatic conservative: ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Research has widely explored the differences between conservatives and liberals, and it has been also recently demonstrated that conservatives display different reactions toward valenced stimuli. However, previous studies have not yet fully illuminated the cognitive underpinnings of these differences. In the current work, we argued that political ideology is related to selective attention processes, so that negative stimuli are more likely to automatically grab the attention of conservatives as compared to liberals. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that negative (vs. positive) information impaired the performance of conservatives, more than liberals, in an Emotional Stroop Task. This finding was confirmed in Experiment 2 and in Experiment 3 employing a Dot-Probe Task, demonstrating that threatening stimuli were more likely to attract the attention of conservatives. Overall, results support the conclusion that people embracing conservative views of the world display an automatic selective attention for negative stimuli.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3212508?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lucianacarraro theautomaticconservativeideologybasedattentionalasymmetriesintheprocessingofvalencedinformation
AT luigicastelli theautomaticconservativeideologybasedattentionalasymmetriesintheprocessingofvalencedinformation
AT claudiamacchiella theautomaticconservativeideologybasedattentionalasymmetriesintheprocessingofvalencedinformation
AT lucianacarraro automaticconservativeideologybasedattentionalasymmetriesintheprocessingofvalencedinformation
AT luigicastelli automaticconservativeideologybasedattentionalasymmetriesintheprocessingofvalencedinformation
AT claudiamacchiella automaticconservativeideologybasedattentionalasymmetriesintheprocessingofvalencedinformation
_version_ 1725978787566321664