Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice

Critically appraised topics (CATs) are evidence syntheses that provide veterinary professionals with information to rapidly address clinical questions and support the practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM). They also have an important role to play in both undergraduate and post-regist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marnie L. Brennan, Sebastian P. Arlt, Zoe Belshaw, Louise Buckley, Louise Corah, Hannah Doit, Virginia R. Fajt, Douglas J. C. Grindlay, Heather K. Moberly, Lisa D. Morrow, Jenny Stavisky, Constance White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00314/full
id doaj-1d088e0a35a04d4c87a438b3b92d84ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d088e0a35a04d4c87a438b3b92d84ff2020-11-25T03:55:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692020-06-01710.3389/fvets.2020.00314531695Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical PracticeMarnie L. Brennan0Sebastian P. Arlt1Zoe Belshaw2Louise Buckley3Louise Corah4Hannah Doit5Virginia R. Fajt6Douglas J. C. Grindlay7Heather K. Moberly8Lisa D. Morrow9Jenny Stavisky10Constance White11Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United KingdomClinic for Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, GermanyPDSA Nottingham, Nottingham, United KingdomDeanery of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United KingdomCentre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United KingdomVeterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United StatesCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United KingdomMedical Sciences Library, University Libraries, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United KingdomSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United KingdomFremont Veterinary Clinic, Portland, OR, United StatesCritically appraised topics (CATs) are evidence syntheses that provide veterinary professionals with information to rapidly address clinical questions and support the practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM). They also have an important role to play in both undergraduate and post-registration education of veterinary professionals, in research and knowledge gap identification, literature scoping, preparing research grants and informing policy. CATs are not without limitations, the primary one relating to the rapid approach used which may lead to selection bias or restrict information identified or retrieved. Furthermore, the narrow focus of CATs may limit applicability of the evidence findings beyond a specific clinical scenario, and infrequently updated CATs may become redundant. Despite these limitations, CATs are fundamental to EBVM in the veterinary profession. Using the example of a dog with osteoarthritis, the five steps involved in creating and applying a CAT to clinical practice are outlined, with an emphasis on clinical relevance and practicalities. Finally, potential future developments for CATs and their role in EBVM, and the education of veterinary professionals are discussed. This review is focused on critically appraised topics (CATs) as a form of evidence synthesis in veterinary medicine. It aims to be a primary guide for veterinarians, from students to clinicians, and for veterinary nurses and technicians (hereafter collectively called veterinary professionals). Additionally, this review provides further information for those with some experience of CATs who would like to better understand the historic context and process, including further detail on more advanced concepts. This more detailed information will appear in pop-out boxes with a double-lined surround to distinguish it from the information core to producing and interpreting CATs, and from the boxes with a single line surround which contain additional resources relevant to the different parts of the review.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00314/fullcritically appraised topic (CAT)knowledge summaryBestBETsevidence synthesisevidence-based veterinary medicineveterinary medicine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marnie L. Brennan
Sebastian P. Arlt
Zoe Belshaw
Louise Buckley
Louise Corah
Hannah Doit
Virginia R. Fajt
Douglas J. C. Grindlay
Heather K. Moberly
Lisa D. Morrow
Jenny Stavisky
Constance White
spellingShingle Marnie L. Brennan
Sebastian P. Arlt
Zoe Belshaw
Louise Buckley
Louise Corah
Hannah Doit
Virginia R. Fajt
Douglas J. C. Grindlay
Heather K. Moberly
Lisa D. Morrow
Jenny Stavisky
Constance White
Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
critically appraised topic (CAT)
knowledge summary
BestBETs
evidence synthesis
evidence-based veterinary medicine
veterinary medicine
author_facet Marnie L. Brennan
Sebastian P. Arlt
Zoe Belshaw
Louise Buckley
Louise Corah
Hannah Doit
Virginia R. Fajt
Douglas J. C. Grindlay
Heather K. Moberly
Lisa D. Morrow
Jenny Stavisky
Constance White
author_sort Marnie L. Brennan
title Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_short Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_full Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Critically Appraised Topics (CATs) in Veterinary Medicine: Applying Evidence in Clinical Practice
title_sort critically appraised topics (cats) in veterinary medicine: applying evidence in clinical practice
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
issn 2297-1769
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Critically appraised topics (CATs) are evidence syntheses that provide veterinary professionals with information to rapidly address clinical questions and support the practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine (EBVM). They also have an important role to play in both undergraduate and post-registration education of veterinary professionals, in research and knowledge gap identification, literature scoping, preparing research grants and informing policy. CATs are not without limitations, the primary one relating to the rapid approach used which may lead to selection bias or restrict information identified or retrieved. Furthermore, the narrow focus of CATs may limit applicability of the evidence findings beyond a specific clinical scenario, and infrequently updated CATs may become redundant. Despite these limitations, CATs are fundamental to EBVM in the veterinary profession. Using the example of a dog with osteoarthritis, the five steps involved in creating and applying a CAT to clinical practice are outlined, with an emphasis on clinical relevance and practicalities. Finally, potential future developments for CATs and their role in EBVM, and the education of veterinary professionals are discussed. This review is focused on critically appraised topics (CATs) as a form of evidence synthesis in veterinary medicine. It aims to be a primary guide for veterinarians, from students to clinicians, and for veterinary nurses and technicians (hereafter collectively called veterinary professionals). Additionally, this review provides further information for those with some experience of CATs who would like to better understand the historic context and process, including further detail on more advanced concepts. This more detailed information will appear in pop-out boxes with a double-lined surround to distinguish it from the information core to producing and interpreting CATs, and from the boxes with a single line surround which contain additional resources relevant to the different parts of the review.
topic critically appraised topic (CAT)
knowledge summary
BestBETs
evidence synthesis
evidence-based veterinary medicine
veterinary medicine
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2020.00314/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marnielbrennan criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT sebastianparlt criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT zoebelshaw criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT louisebuckley criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT louisecorah criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT hannahdoit criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT virginiarfajt criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT douglasjcgrindlay criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT heatherkmoberly criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT lisadmorrow criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT jennystavisky criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
AT constancewhite criticallyappraisedtopicscatsinveterinarymedicineapplyingevidenceinclinicalpractice
_version_ 1724469547591794688