Corpus-Based Study of Discursive Representation of ‘Other’ in Diachronic Perspective

Based on the corpus methodology the paper presents the results of diachronic analysis of the discursive representation of ‘Other’ by comparing two corpora, one comprising texts of travelogues dating back to the end of the 19th century and the corpus of present day blogs on travel. The key word tool...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kochetova Larisa, Plavina Anastasya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001132
id doaj-1d05555b049a47baa3fff262bff5aaa6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1d05555b049a47baa3fff262bff5aaa62021-02-02T02:55:40ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242018-01-01500113210.1051/shsconf/20185001132shsconf_cildiah2018_01132Corpus-Based Study of Discursive Representation of ‘Other’ in Diachronic PerspectiveKochetova LarisaPlavina AnastasyaBased on the corpus methodology the paper presents the results of diachronic analysis of the discursive representation of ‘Other’ by comparing two corpora, one comprising texts of travelogues dating back to the end of the 19th century and the corpus of present day blogs on travel. The key word tool of LancBox64 software allowed extracting the list of key words, from which lexemes that represent ‘Other’ were selected and categorized. The sketch tool was used to build word sketches for the lexemes identified to revel deffereces in patterns of meaning. The data obtained allowed us to contrast and compare the means of discursive representation of ‘Other’ in diachronic perspective, describe discursive strategies and determine historical and cultural patterns reflected in the discourse practice. Comparative analysis of statistical data in the periods under study revealed dynamic changes that are manifested in the use of peculiar nominative means that represent categories of social actors; employment of attributive and verbal evaluative lexemes that are used for discursive construing of other cultural society representatives in the consciousness of Western people.https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001132
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kochetova Larisa
Plavina Anastasya
spellingShingle Kochetova Larisa
Plavina Anastasya
Corpus-Based Study of Discursive Representation of ‘Other’ in Diachronic Perspective
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Kochetova Larisa
Plavina Anastasya
author_sort Kochetova Larisa
title Corpus-Based Study of Discursive Representation of ‘Other’ in Diachronic Perspective
title_short Corpus-Based Study of Discursive Representation of ‘Other’ in Diachronic Perspective
title_full Corpus-Based Study of Discursive Representation of ‘Other’ in Diachronic Perspective
title_fullStr Corpus-Based Study of Discursive Representation of ‘Other’ in Diachronic Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Corpus-Based Study of Discursive Representation of ‘Other’ in Diachronic Perspective
title_sort corpus-based study of discursive representation of ‘other’ in diachronic perspective
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Based on the corpus methodology the paper presents the results of diachronic analysis of the discursive representation of ‘Other’ by comparing two corpora, one comprising texts of travelogues dating back to the end of the 19th century and the corpus of present day blogs on travel. The key word tool of LancBox64 software allowed extracting the list of key words, from which lexemes that represent ‘Other’ were selected and categorized. The sketch tool was used to build word sketches for the lexemes identified to revel deffereces in patterns of meaning. The data obtained allowed us to contrast and compare the means of discursive representation of ‘Other’ in diachronic perspective, describe discursive strategies and determine historical and cultural patterns reflected in the discourse practice. Comparative analysis of statistical data in the periods under study revealed dynamic changes that are manifested in the use of peculiar nominative means that represent categories of social actors; employment of attributive and verbal evaluative lexemes that are used for discursive construing of other cultural society representatives in the consciousness of Western people.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001132
work_keys_str_mv AT kochetovalarisa corpusbasedstudyofdiscursiverepresentationofotherindiachronicperspective
AT plavinaanastasya corpusbasedstudyofdiscursiverepresentationofotherindiachronicperspective
_version_ 1724308850442502144