More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station

<p>A weather station built using 3D-printed parts and low-cost sensors, based on plans and guidance provided by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 3D-Printed Automatic Weather Station Initiative, was deployed alongside an Oklahoma Mesonet station to compare its performance aga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Theisen, M. Ungar, B. Sheridan, B. G. Illston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-09-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/4699/2020/amt-13-4699-2020.pdf
id doaj-1cee1f6bb2fb4476b0a655b2f8746aa3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1cee1f6bb2fb4476b0a655b2f8746aa32020-11-25T03:33:17ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482020-09-01134699471310.5194/amt-13-4699-2020More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather stationA. Theisen0A. Theisen1M. Ungar2B. Sheridan3B. G. Illston4Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Suite 2100 Norman, OK 73072, USAArgonne National Laboratory, 9700 S Cass Ave, Lemont, IL 60439, USACooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Suite 2100 Norman, OK 73072, USACooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Suite 2100 Norman, OK 73072, USAOklahoma Mesonet, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Suite 2900 Norman, OK 73072, USA<p>A weather station built using 3D-printed parts and low-cost sensors, based on plans and guidance provided by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 3D-Printed Automatic Weather Station Initiative, was deployed alongside an Oklahoma Mesonet station to compare its performance against standard commercial sensors and determine the longevity and durability of the system. Temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, wind speed and direction, solar radiation, and precipitation measurements were collected over an 8-month field deployment in Norman, Oklahoma. Measurements were comparable to the commercial sensors except for wind direction, which proved to be problematic. Longevity and durability of the system varied, as some sensors and 3D-printed components failed during the deployment. Overall, results show that these low-cost sensors are comparable to the more expensive commercial counterparts and could serve as viable alternatives for researchers and educators with limited resources for short-term deployments. Long-term deployments are feasible with proper maintenance and regular replacement of sensors and 3D-printed components.</p>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/4699/2020/amt-13-4699-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Theisen
A. Theisen
M. Ungar
B. Sheridan
B. G. Illston
spellingShingle A. Theisen
A. Theisen
M. Ungar
B. Sheridan
B. G. Illston
More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet A. Theisen
A. Theisen
M. Ungar
B. Sheridan
B. G. Illston
author_sort A. Theisen
title More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station
title_short More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station
title_full More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station
title_fullStr More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station
title_full_unstemmed More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station
title_sort more science with less: evaluation of a 3d-printed weather station
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2020-09-01
description <p>A weather station built using 3D-printed parts and low-cost sensors, based on plans and guidance provided by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 3D-Printed Automatic Weather Station Initiative, was deployed alongside an Oklahoma Mesonet station to compare its performance against standard commercial sensors and determine the longevity and durability of the system. Temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, wind speed and direction, solar radiation, and precipitation measurements were collected over an 8-month field deployment in Norman, Oklahoma. Measurements were comparable to the commercial sensors except for wind direction, which proved to be problematic. Longevity and durability of the system varied, as some sensors and 3D-printed components failed during the deployment. Overall, results show that these low-cost sensors are comparable to the more expensive commercial counterparts and could serve as viable alternatives for researchers and educators with limited resources for short-term deployments. Long-term deployments are feasible with proper maintenance and regular replacement of sensors and 3D-printed components.</p>
url https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/4699/2020/amt-13-4699-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT atheisen moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation
AT atheisen moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation
AT mungar moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation
AT bsheridan moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation
AT bgillston moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation
_version_ 1724563459722444800