More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station
<p>A weather station built using 3D-printed parts and low-cost sensors, based on plans and guidance provided by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 3D-Printed Automatic Weather Station Initiative, was deployed alongside an Oklahoma Mesonet station to compare its performance aga...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
Online Access: | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/4699/2020/amt-13-4699-2020.pdf |
id |
doaj-1cee1f6bb2fb4476b0a655b2f8746aa3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1cee1f6bb2fb4476b0a655b2f8746aa32020-11-25T03:33:17ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482020-09-01134699471310.5194/amt-13-4699-2020More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather stationA. Theisen0A. Theisen1M. Ungar2B. Sheridan3B. G. Illston4Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Suite 2100 Norman, OK 73072, USAArgonne National Laboratory, 9700 S Cass Ave, Lemont, IL 60439, USACooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Suite 2100 Norman, OK 73072, USACooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Suite 2100 Norman, OK 73072, USAOklahoma Mesonet, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Suite 2900 Norman, OK 73072, USA<p>A weather station built using 3D-printed parts and low-cost sensors, based on plans and guidance provided by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 3D-Printed Automatic Weather Station Initiative, was deployed alongside an Oklahoma Mesonet station to compare its performance against standard commercial sensors and determine the longevity and durability of the system. Temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, wind speed and direction, solar radiation, and precipitation measurements were collected over an 8-month field deployment in Norman, Oklahoma. Measurements were comparable to the commercial sensors except for wind direction, which proved to be problematic. Longevity and durability of the system varied, as some sensors and 3D-printed components failed during the deployment. Overall, results show that these low-cost sensors are comparable to the more expensive commercial counterparts and could serve as viable alternatives for researchers and educators with limited resources for short-term deployments. Long-term deployments are feasible with proper maintenance and regular replacement of sensors and 3D-printed components.</p>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/4699/2020/amt-13-4699-2020.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
A. Theisen A. Theisen M. Ungar B. Sheridan B. G. Illston |
spellingShingle |
A. Theisen A. Theisen M. Ungar B. Sheridan B. G. Illston More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
author_facet |
A. Theisen A. Theisen M. Ungar B. Sheridan B. G. Illston |
author_sort |
A. Theisen |
title |
More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station |
title_short |
More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station |
title_full |
More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station |
title_fullStr |
More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station |
title_full_unstemmed |
More science with less: evaluation of a 3D-printed weather station |
title_sort |
more science with less: evaluation of a 3d-printed weather station |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
issn |
1867-1381 1867-8548 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
<p>A weather station built using 3D-printed parts and low-cost sensors, based on plans and guidance provided by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 3D-Printed Automatic Weather Station Initiative, was deployed alongside an Oklahoma Mesonet station to compare its performance against standard commercial sensors and determine the longevity and durability of the system. Temperature, relative humidity, atmospheric pressure, wind speed and direction, solar radiation, and precipitation measurements were collected over an 8-month field deployment in Norman, Oklahoma. Measurements were comparable to the commercial sensors except for wind direction, which proved to be problematic. Longevity and durability of the system varied, as some sensors and 3D-printed components failed during the deployment. Overall, results show that these low-cost sensors are comparable to the more expensive commercial counterparts and could serve as viable alternatives for researchers and educators with limited resources for short-term deployments. Long-term deployments are feasible with proper maintenance and regular replacement of sensors and 3D-printed components.</p> |
url |
https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/4699/2020/amt-13-4699-2020.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT atheisen moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation AT atheisen moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation AT mungar moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation AT bsheridan moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation AT bgillston moresciencewithlessevaluationofa3dprintedweatherstation |
_version_ |
1724563459722444800 |