“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies
With the increase in global movement, both temporary (travel and transsettlement) and permanent (e/immigration), traditional conceptions of the linguistic processes rooted largely in the long-term translocation(s) or migrations are revisited through the study of family language policy. The present s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Open Linguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0037 |
id |
doaj-1cdf266c3b9e4af4a8bdbcc37cf5f7c5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1cdf266c3b9e4af4a8bdbcc37cf5f7c52021-10-02T19:05:04ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692020-12-016164265010.1515/opli-2020-0037opli-2020-0037“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual IdeologiesHirsch Tijana0Kayam Orly1Language and Literacy, Wingate Academic College, Netanya, 4290200, IsraelLanguage and Literacy, Wingate Academic College, Netanya, 4290200, IsraelWith the increase in global movement, both temporary (travel and transsettlement) and permanent (e/immigration), traditional conceptions of the linguistic processes rooted largely in the long-term translocation(s) or migrations are revisited through the study of family language policy. The present study of family language policy serves as a telling case (Mitchell, 1984) of (1) translanguaging (Williams, 1994) as a practical theory of language (Li, 2018), describing how the transnational individual experienced the construction of two intergenerational translanguaging spaces (Li, 2011): the family and the community and (2) how the phenomenon of monolingual ideologies infiltrates the translanguaging space of the family to exert its influences toward the standard, in this case the standard Russian dialect. Importance of increased mobility characteristic of contemporary times and the central role of temporality in linguistic processes and their disruptions are discussed in this article.https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0037family language policytranslanguagingtransnationalism |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hirsch Tijana Kayam Orly |
spellingShingle |
Hirsch Tijana Kayam Orly “We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies Open Linguistics family language policy translanguaging transnationalism |
author_facet |
Hirsch Tijana Kayam Orly |
author_sort |
Hirsch Tijana |
title |
“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies |
title_short |
“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies |
title_full |
“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies |
title_fullStr |
“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies |
title_full_unstemmed |
“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies |
title_sort |
“we speak pidgin!” – family language policy as the telling case for translanguaging spaces and monolingual ideologies |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Linguistics |
issn |
2300-9969 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
With the increase in global movement, both temporary (travel and transsettlement) and permanent (e/immigration), traditional conceptions of the linguistic processes rooted largely in the long-term translocation(s) or migrations are revisited through the study of family language policy. The present study of family language policy serves as a telling case (Mitchell, 1984) of (1) translanguaging (Williams, 1994) as a practical theory of language (Li, 2018), describing how the transnational individual experienced the construction of two intergenerational translanguaging spaces (Li, 2011): the family and the community and (2) how the phenomenon of monolingual ideologies infiltrates the translanguaging space of the family to exert its influences toward the standard, in this case the standard Russian dialect. Importance of increased mobility characteristic of contemporary times and the central role of temporality in linguistic processes and their disruptions are discussed in this article. |
topic |
family language policy translanguaging transnationalism |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0037 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hirschtijana wespeakpidginfamilylanguagepolicyasthetellingcasefortranslanguagingspacesandmonolingualideologies AT kayamorly wespeakpidginfamilylanguagepolicyasthetellingcasefortranslanguagingspacesandmonolingualideologies |
_version_ |
1716848173033455616 |