“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies

With the increase in global movement, both temporary (travel and transsettlement) and permanent (e/immigration), traditional conceptions of the linguistic processes rooted largely in the long-term translocation(s) or migrations are revisited through the study of family language policy. The present s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hirsch Tijana, Kayam Orly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2020-12-01
Series:Open Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0037
id doaj-1cdf266c3b9e4af4a8bdbcc37cf5f7c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1cdf266c3b9e4af4a8bdbcc37cf5f7c52021-10-02T19:05:04ZengDe GruyterOpen Linguistics2300-99692020-12-016164265010.1515/opli-2020-0037opli-2020-0037“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual IdeologiesHirsch Tijana0Kayam Orly1Language and Literacy, Wingate Academic College, Netanya, 4290200, IsraelLanguage and Literacy, Wingate Academic College, Netanya, 4290200, IsraelWith the increase in global movement, both temporary (travel and transsettlement) and permanent (e/immigration), traditional conceptions of the linguistic processes rooted largely in the long-term translocation(s) or migrations are revisited through the study of family language policy. The present study of family language policy serves as a telling case (Mitchell, 1984) of (1) translanguaging (Williams, 1994) as a practical theory of language (Li, 2018), describing how the transnational individual experienced the construction of two intergenerational translanguaging spaces (Li, 2011): the family and the community and (2) how the phenomenon of monolingual ideologies infiltrates the translanguaging space of the family to exert its influences toward the standard, in this case the standard Russian dialect. Importance of increased mobility characteristic of contemporary times and the central role of temporality in linguistic processes and their disruptions are discussed in this article.https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0037family language policytranslanguagingtransnationalism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hirsch Tijana
Kayam Orly
spellingShingle Hirsch Tijana
Kayam Orly
“We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies
Open Linguistics
family language policy
translanguaging
transnationalism
author_facet Hirsch Tijana
Kayam Orly
author_sort Hirsch Tijana
title “We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies
title_short “We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies
title_full “We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies
title_fullStr “We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies
title_full_unstemmed “We Speak Pidgin!” – Family Language Policy as the Telling Case for Translanguaging Spaces and Monolingual Ideologies
title_sort “we speak pidgin!” – family language policy as the telling case for translanguaging spaces and monolingual ideologies
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Linguistics
issn 2300-9969
publishDate 2020-12-01
description With the increase in global movement, both temporary (travel and transsettlement) and permanent (e/immigration), traditional conceptions of the linguistic processes rooted largely in the long-term translocation(s) or migrations are revisited through the study of family language policy. The present study of family language policy serves as a telling case (Mitchell, 1984) of (1) translanguaging (Williams, 1994) as a practical theory of language (Li, 2018), describing how the transnational individual experienced the construction of two intergenerational translanguaging spaces (Li, 2011): the family and the community and (2) how the phenomenon of monolingual ideologies infiltrates the translanguaging space of the family to exert its influences toward the standard, in this case the standard Russian dialect. Importance of increased mobility characteristic of contemporary times and the central role of temporality in linguistic processes and their disruptions are discussed in this article.
topic family language policy
translanguaging
transnationalism
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0037
work_keys_str_mv AT hirschtijana wespeakpidginfamilylanguagepolicyasthetellingcasefortranslanguagingspacesandmonolingualideologies
AT kayamorly wespeakpidginfamilylanguagepolicyasthetellingcasefortranslanguagingspacesandmonolingualideologies
_version_ 1716848173033455616