Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks
While until quite recently debates in political philosophy on questions of pluralism, tolerance, and liberal governance foregrounded notions of culture and cultural difference, today it is religion that increasingly provides the historical and conceptual resources for the contemporary reassessment o...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Finnish Society for the Study of Religion
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Temenos |
Online Access: | https://journal.fi/temenos/article/view/4602 |
id |
doaj-1cddc0674c624ced9f62e7306ad5d0e1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1cddc0674c624ced9f62e7306ad5d0e12020-11-25T02:54:57ZengFinnish Society for the Study of ReligionTemenos2342-72562008-01-0144110.33356/temenos.4602Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and FrameworksCHARLES HIRSCHKIND0University of CaliforniaWhile until quite recently debates in political philosophy on questions of pluralism, tolerance, and liberal governance foregrounded notions of culture and cultural difference, today it is religion that increasingly provides the historical and conceptual resources for the contemporary reassessment of the pragmatic and philosophical conditions for pluralist democracy. Drawing on a few recent writings in the field of political theology, this paper explores some of the analytical directions that this repositioning of religion within contemporary narratives of modernity has opened up within political philosophy. As I seek to demonstrate, the domain of political theology has become the problem space, where the tensions and contradictions between a simultaneous insistence on Europe's secular identity and its Christian one are being elaborated. Through a ceratin double movement, secularism and Christianity have become productively fused within the writings I address, in a way that repeats the story of European exeptionality while inscribing the essential otherness of the Muslim populations within its borders. In the second part of the paper, I want to contrast these reflections from political philosophy with debates in postcolonial Egypt around issues of religion and the possibility of democratic pluralism.https://journal.fi/temenos/article/view/4602 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
CHARLES HIRSCHKIND |
spellingShingle |
CHARLES HIRSCHKIND Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks Temenos |
author_facet |
CHARLES HIRSCHKIND |
author_sort |
CHARLES HIRSCHKIND |
title |
Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks |
title_short |
Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks |
title_full |
Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks |
title_fullStr |
Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks |
title_sort |
religious difference and democratic pluralism: some recent debates and frameworks |
publisher |
Finnish Society for the Study of Religion |
series |
Temenos |
issn |
2342-7256 |
publishDate |
2008-01-01 |
description |
While until quite recently debates in political philosophy on questions of pluralism, tolerance, and liberal governance foregrounded notions of culture and cultural difference, today it is religion that increasingly provides the historical and conceptual resources for the contemporary reassessment of the pragmatic and philosophical conditions for pluralist democracy. Drawing on a few recent writings in the field of political theology, this paper explores some of the analytical directions that this repositioning of religion within contemporary narratives of modernity has opened up within political philosophy. As I seek to demonstrate, the domain of political theology has become the problem space, where the tensions and contradictions between a simultaneous insistence on Europe's secular identity and its Christian one are being elaborated. Through a ceratin double movement, secularism and Christianity have become productively fused within the writings I address, in a way that repeats the story of European exeptionality while inscribing the essential otherness of the Muslim populations within its borders. In the second part of the paper, I want to contrast these reflections from political philosophy with debates in postcolonial Egypt around issues of religion and the possibility of democratic pluralism. |
url |
https://journal.fi/temenos/article/view/4602 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT charleshirschkind religiousdifferenceanddemocraticpluralismsomerecentdebatesandframeworks |
_version_ |
1724718890543480832 |