Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks

While until quite recently debates in political philosophy on questions of pluralism, tolerance, and liberal governance foregrounded notions of culture and cultural difference, today it is religion that increasingly provides the historical and conceptual resources for the contemporary reassessment o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHARLES HIRSCHKIND
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society for the Study of Religion 2008-01-01
Series:Temenos
Online Access:https://journal.fi/temenos/article/view/4602
id doaj-1cddc0674c624ced9f62e7306ad5d0e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1cddc0674c624ced9f62e7306ad5d0e12020-11-25T02:54:57ZengFinnish Society for the Study of ReligionTemenos2342-72562008-01-0144110.33356/temenos.4602Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and FrameworksCHARLES HIRSCHKIND0University of CaliforniaWhile until quite recently debates in political philosophy on questions of pluralism, tolerance, and liberal governance foregrounded notions of culture and cultural difference, today it is religion that increasingly provides the historical and conceptual resources for the contemporary reassessment of the pragmatic and philosophical conditions for pluralist democracy. Drawing on a few recent writings in the field of political theology, this paper explores some of the analytical directions that this repositioning of religion within contemporary narratives of modernity has opened up within political philosophy. As I seek to demonstrate, the domain of political theology has become the problem space, where the tensions and contradictions between a simultaneous insistence on Europe's secular identity and its Christian one are being elaborated. Through a ceratin double movement, secularism and Christianity have become productively fused within the writings I address, in a way that repeats the story of European exeptionality while inscribing the essential otherness of the Muslim populations within its borders. In the second part of the paper, I want to contrast these reflections from political philosophy with debates in postcolonial Egypt around issues of religion and the possibility of democratic pluralism.https://journal.fi/temenos/article/view/4602
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author CHARLES HIRSCHKIND
spellingShingle CHARLES HIRSCHKIND
Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks
Temenos
author_facet CHARLES HIRSCHKIND
author_sort CHARLES HIRSCHKIND
title Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks
title_short Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks
title_full Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks
title_fullStr Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks
title_full_unstemmed Religious Difference and Democratic Pluralism: Some Recent Debates and Frameworks
title_sort religious difference and democratic pluralism: some recent debates and frameworks
publisher Finnish Society for the Study of Religion
series Temenos
issn 2342-7256
publishDate 2008-01-01
description While until quite recently debates in political philosophy on questions of pluralism, tolerance, and liberal governance foregrounded notions of culture and cultural difference, today it is religion that increasingly provides the historical and conceptual resources for the contemporary reassessment of the pragmatic and philosophical conditions for pluralist democracy. Drawing on a few recent writings in the field of political theology, this paper explores some of the analytical directions that this repositioning of religion within contemporary narratives of modernity has opened up within political philosophy. As I seek to demonstrate, the domain of political theology has become the problem space, where the tensions and contradictions between a simultaneous insistence on Europe's secular identity and its Christian one are being elaborated. Through a ceratin double movement, secularism and Christianity have become productively fused within the writings I address, in a way that repeats the story of European exeptionality while inscribing the essential otherness of the Muslim populations within its borders. In the second part of the paper, I want to contrast these reflections from political philosophy with debates in postcolonial Egypt around issues of religion and the possibility of democratic pluralism.
url https://journal.fi/temenos/article/view/4602
work_keys_str_mv AT charleshirschkind religiousdifferenceanddemocraticpluralismsomerecentdebatesandframeworks
_version_ 1724718890543480832