Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions

Abstract Background Replication timing experiments that use label incorporation and high throughput sequencing produce peaked data similar to ChIP-Seq experiments. However, the differences in experimental design, coverage density, and possible results make traditional ChIP-Seq analysis methods inapp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregory J. Zynda, Jawon Song, Lorenzo Concia, Emily E. Wear, Linda Hanley-Bowdoin, William F. Thompson, Matthew W. Vaughn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-08-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-017-1774-x
id doaj-1cd2aaaf74cc40fba7d5412e56da010a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1cd2aaaf74cc40fba7d5412e56da010a2020-11-25T00:42:44ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052017-08-0118111410.1186/s12859-017-1774-xRepliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regionsGregory J. Zynda0Jawon Song1Lorenzo Concia2Emily E. Wear3Linda Hanley-Bowdoin4William F. Thompson5Matthew W. Vaughn6Texas Advanced Computing Center, University of Texas at AustinTexas Advanced Computing Center, University of Texas at AustinDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State UniversityDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State UniversityDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State UniversityDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State UniversityTexas Advanced Computing Center, University of Texas at AustinAbstract Background Replication timing experiments that use label incorporation and high throughput sequencing produce peaked data similar to ChIP-Seq experiments. However, the differences in experimental design, coverage density, and possible results make traditional ChIP-Seq analysis methods inappropriate for use with replication timing. Results To accurately detect and classify regions of replication across the genome, we present Repliscan. Repliscan robustly normalizes, automatically removes outlying and uninformative data points, and classifies Repli-seq signals into discrete combinations of replication signatures. The quality control steps and self-fitting methods make Repliscan generally applicable and more robust than previous methods that classify regions based on thresholds. Conclusions Repliscan is simple and effective to use on organisms with different genome sizes. Even with analysis window sizes as small as 1 kilobase, reliable profiles can be generated with as little as 2.4x coverage.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-017-1774-xDNA replicationRepli-seqClassification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gregory J. Zynda
Jawon Song
Lorenzo Concia
Emily E. Wear
Linda Hanley-Bowdoin
William F. Thompson
Matthew W. Vaughn
spellingShingle Gregory J. Zynda
Jawon Song
Lorenzo Concia
Emily E. Wear
Linda Hanley-Bowdoin
William F. Thompson
Matthew W. Vaughn
Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions
BMC Bioinformatics
DNA replication
Repli-seq
Classification
author_facet Gregory J. Zynda
Jawon Song
Lorenzo Concia
Emily E. Wear
Linda Hanley-Bowdoin
William F. Thompson
Matthew W. Vaughn
author_sort Gregory J. Zynda
title Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions
title_short Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions
title_full Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions
title_fullStr Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions
title_full_unstemmed Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions
title_sort repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Abstract Background Replication timing experiments that use label incorporation and high throughput sequencing produce peaked data similar to ChIP-Seq experiments. However, the differences in experimental design, coverage density, and possible results make traditional ChIP-Seq analysis methods inappropriate for use with replication timing. Results To accurately detect and classify regions of replication across the genome, we present Repliscan. Repliscan robustly normalizes, automatically removes outlying and uninformative data points, and classifies Repli-seq signals into discrete combinations of replication signatures. The quality control steps and self-fitting methods make Repliscan generally applicable and more robust than previous methods that classify regions based on thresholds. Conclusions Repliscan is simple and effective to use on organisms with different genome sizes. Even with analysis window sizes as small as 1 kilobase, reliable profiles can be generated with as little as 2.4x coverage.
topic DNA replication
Repli-seq
Classification
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-017-1774-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gregoryjzynda repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions
AT jawonsong repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions
AT lorenzoconcia repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions
AT emilyewear repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions
AT lindahanleybowdoin repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions
AT williamfthompson repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions
AT matthewwvaughn repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions
_version_ 1725280579511910400