Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions
Abstract Background Replication timing experiments that use label incorporation and high throughput sequencing produce peaked data similar to ChIP-Seq experiments. However, the differences in experimental design, coverage density, and possible results make traditional ChIP-Seq analysis methods inapp...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Bioinformatics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-017-1774-x |
id |
doaj-1cd2aaaf74cc40fba7d5412e56da010a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1cd2aaaf74cc40fba7d5412e56da010a2020-11-25T00:42:44ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052017-08-0118111410.1186/s12859-017-1774-xRepliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regionsGregory J. Zynda0Jawon Song1Lorenzo Concia2Emily E. Wear3Linda Hanley-Bowdoin4William F. Thompson5Matthew W. Vaughn6Texas Advanced Computing Center, University of Texas at AustinTexas Advanced Computing Center, University of Texas at AustinDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State UniversityDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State UniversityDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State UniversityDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State UniversityTexas Advanced Computing Center, University of Texas at AustinAbstract Background Replication timing experiments that use label incorporation and high throughput sequencing produce peaked data similar to ChIP-Seq experiments. However, the differences in experimental design, coverage density, and possible results make traditional ChIP-Seq analysis methods inappropriate for use with replication timing. Results To accurately detect and classify regions of replication across the genome, we present Repliscan. Repliscan robustly normalizes, automatically removes outlying and uninformative data points, and classifies Repli-seq signals into discrete combinations of replication signatures. The quality control steps and self-fitting methods make Repliscan generally applicable and more robust than previous methods that classify regions based on thresholds. Conclusions Repliscan is simple and effective to use on organisms with different genome sizes. Even with analysis window sizes as small as 1 kilobase, reliable profiles can be generated with as little as 2.4x coverage.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-017-1774-xDNA replicationRepli-seqClassification |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gregory J. Zynda Jawon Song Lorenzo Concia Emily E. Wear Linda Hanley-Bowdoin William F. Thompson Matthew W. Vaughn |
spellingShingle |
Gregory J. Zynda Jawon Song Lorenzo Concia Emily E. Wear Linda Hanley-Bowdoin William F. Thompson Matthew W. Vaughn Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions BMC Bioinformatics DNA replication Repli-seq Classification |
author_facet |
Gregory J. Zynda Jawon Song Lorenzo Concia Emily E. Wear Linda Hanley-Bowdoin William F. Thompson Matthew W. Vaughn |
author_sort |
Gregory J. Zynda |
title |
Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions |
title_short |
Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions |
title_full |
Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions |
title_fullStr |
Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions |
title_sort |
repliscan: a tool for classifying replication timing regions |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Bioinformatics |
issn |
1471-2105 |
publishDate |
2017-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Replication timing experiments that use label incorporation and high throughput sequencing produce peaked data similar to ChIP-Seq experiments. However, the differences in experimental design, coverage density, and possible results make traditional ChIP-Seq analysis methods inappropriate for use with replication timing. Results To accurately detect and classify regions of replication across the genome, we present Repliscan. Repliscan robustly normalizes, automatically removes outlying and uninformative data points, and classifies Repli-seq signals into discrete combinations of replication signatures. The quality control steps and self-fitting methods make Repliscan generally applicable and more robust than previous methods that classify regions based on thresholds. Conclusions Repliscan is simple and effective to use on organisms with different genome sizes. Even with analysis window sizes as small as 1 kilobase, reliable profiles can be generated with as little as 2.4x coverage. |
topic |
DNA replication Repli-seq Classification |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12859-017-1774-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gregoryjzynda repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions AT jawonsong repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions AT lorenzoconcia repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions AT emilyewear repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions AT lindahanleybowdoin repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions AT williamfthompson repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions AT matthewwvaughn repliscanatoolforclassifyingreplicationtimingregions |
_version_ |
1725280579511910400 |