The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF), which are both novel methods of analyzing ocular rigidity/elasticity, and various corneal cha-racteristics, mainly corneal volume in normal subjects. Methods:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Reza Sedaghat, Maria Sharepoor, Samira Hassanzadeh, Mojtaba Abrishami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2012;volume=17;issue=1;spage=32;epage=39;aulast=Sedaghat
id doaj-1c98e3a353a04f6580a8a2aacc4b47c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1c98e3a353a04f6580a8a2aacc4b47c52020-11-24T20:48:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362012-01-011713239The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?Mohammad Reza SedaghatMaria SharepoorSamira HassanzadehMojtaba AbrishamiBackground: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF), which are both novel methods of analyzing ocular rigidity/elasticity, and various corneal cha-racteristics, mainly corneal volume in normal subjects. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 500 normal eyes of volunteers. An ocular response analyzer (ORA) was used to measure CH and CRF. Patient age and the Pentacam-measured corneal volume (CV), posterior elevation, ante-rior elevation, corneal curvature, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal thickness of apex (CTA), and corneal thinnest thickness (CTT) were compared with CH and CRF. Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.05. Results: The mean CH and CRF for all eyes were 9.9 ± 1.4 mmHg and 10.1 ± 1.6 mmHg, respectively. The mean CVs of the 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm zones for all eyes were 3.8 ± 0.2 mm3, 11.2 ± 0.6 mm3, 24.3 ± 1.4 mm3, and 60.1 ± 3.5 mm3, respectively. The correlations between CV and the hysteresis or CRF were significant in all zones. The CV of the 7-mm zone had the strongest correlation with CH (r = 0.438) and the CV of the 5-mm zone had the strongest correlation with CRF (r = 0.574). Conclusions: CH and CRF correlate with CV. Moreover, the correlation between CV and CRF is stronger than that between CV and CH. The CV may be valuable for determining patient′s qualification for and predicting the outcome of refractive surgery. It would also be helpful in other cases in which corneal biomechanics are important.http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2012;volume=17;issue=1;spage=32;epage=39;aulast=SedaghatCorneaCorneal BiomechanicsCorneal Resistance FactorCorneal HysteresisOcular Response Analyz-erPentacamCorneal VolumeCorneal Thickness.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Reza Sedaghat
Maria Sharepoor
Samira Hassanzadeh
Mojtaba Abrishami
spellingShingle Mohammad Reza Sedaghat
Maria Sharepoor
Samira Hassanzadeh
Mojtaba Abrishami
The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Cornea
Corneal Biomechanics
Corneal Resistance Factor
Corneal Hysteresis
Ocular Response Analyz-er
Pentacam
Corneal Volume
Corneal Thickness.
author_facet Mohammad Reza Sedaghat
Maria Sharepoor
Samira Hassanzadeh
Mojtaba Abrishami
author_sort Mohammad Reza Sedaghat
title The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?
title_short The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?
title_full The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?
title_fullStr The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?
title_full_unstemmed The corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: Is there any orrelation?
title_sort corneal volume and biomechanical corneal factors: is there any orrelation?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF), which are both novel methods of analyzing ocular rigidity/elasticity, and various corneal cha-racteristics, mainly corneal volume in normal subjects. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 500 normal eyes of volunteers. An ocular response analyzer (ORA) was used to measure CH and CRF. Patient age and the Pentacam-measured corneal volume (CV), posterior elevation, ante-rior elevation, corneal curvature, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal thickness of apex (CTA), and corneal thinnest thickness (CTT) were compared with CH and CRF. Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.05. Results: The mean CH and CRF for all eyes were 9.9 ± 1.4 mmHg and 10.1 ± 1.6 mmHg, respectively. The mean CVs of the 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm zones for all eyes were 3.8 ± 0.2 mm3, 11.2 ± 0.6 mm3, 24.3 ± 1.4 mm3, and 60.1 ± 3.5 mm3, respectively. The correlations between CV and the hysteresis or CRF were significant in all zones. The CV of the 7-mm zone had the strongest correlation with CH (r = 0.438) and the CV of the 5-mm zone had the strongest correlation with CRF (r = 0.574). Conclusions: CH and CRF correlate with CV. Moreover, the correlation between CV and CRF is stronger than that between CV and CH. The CV may be valuable for determining patient′s qualification for and predicting the outcome of refractive surgery. It would also be helpful in other cases in which corneal biomechanics are important.
topic Cornea
Corneal Biomechanics
Corneal Resistance Factor
Corneal Hysteresis
Ocular Response Analyz-er
Pentacam
Corneal Volume
Corneal Thickness.
url http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2012;volume=17;issue=1;spage=32;epage=39;aulast=Sedaghat
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadrezasedaghat thecornealvolumeandbiomechanicalcornealfactorsisthereanyorrelation
AT mariasharepoor thecornealvolumeandbiomechanicalcornealfactorsisthereanyorrelation
AT samirahassanzadeh thecornealvolumeandbiomechanicalcornealfactorsisthereanyorrelation
AT mojtabaabrishami thecornealvolumeandbiomechanicalcornealfactorsisthereanyorrelation
AT mohammadrezasedaghat cornealvolumeandbiomechanicalcornealfactorsisthereanyorrelation
AT mariasharepoor cornealvolumeandbiomechanicalcornealfactorsisthereanyorrelation
AT samirahassanzadeh cornealvolumeandbiomechanicalcornealfactorsisthereanyorrelation
AT mojtabaabrishami cornealvolumeandbiomechanicalcornealfactorsisthereanyorrelation
_version_ 1716807675876999168