Fiscal Policy, Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Case of Indian Economy

Through this study, we try to evaluate the effects that the direct and indirect taxation and the subsidies provided by the Government have on income inequality. We use Gini coefficient as a measure of inequality and use annual data for Indian economy for years 1982-2015 and employ an ARDL-based boun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deven Bansod, Geetilaxmi Mohapatra, A. K. Giri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editura ASE Bucuresti 2017-03-01
Series:Romanian Economic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/files/articole/2017-04-02/3441/5giri.pdf
id doaj-1c93d5cfeaf84494b6ef0209c76142fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1c93d5cfeaf84494b6ef0209c76142fc2020-11-24T21:01:27ZengEditura ASE BucurestiRomanian Economic Journal1454-42962286-20562017-03-01XX637288Fiscal Policy, Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Case of Indian EconomyDeven Bansod0Geetilaxmi Mohapatra1A. K. Giri2Graduate Student, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India, f2012316@pilani.bits-pilani.ac.inAssistant Professor, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India, geetilaxmi@pilani.bits-pilani.ac.inAssociate Professor, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India, akgiri@pilani.bits-pilani.ac.inThrough this study, we try to evaluate the effects that the direct and indirect taxation and the subsidies provided by the Government have on income inequality. We use Gini coefficient as a measure of inequality and use annual data for Indian economy for years 1982-2015 and employ an ARDL-based bounds test approach for testing co-integration. We ascertain the stationarity properties for all the series, separately using the ADF test, the DF-GLS test and the KPSS test. We estimate the long-run and short-run coefficients and find that a long-run negative relationship exists between Gini coefficient and subsidy-related expenditure. The long-run coefficients of direct and indirect taxation terms are positive but are significant only at 10%. The short-run coefficients obtained from ECM show that a negative relationship exists between expenditure on subsidies and Gini coefficient. In short run, direct tax seems to have an insignificant positive coefficient while indirect tax seems to have a significant unbalancing effect. We employ the Granger causality tests to confirm direction of causality and find that there runs a unidirectional causality from direct tax, indirect tax and subsidy to Gini coefficient, while any causality from Gini to any series is largely insignificant. The results imply that the government should use the calculated hybrid of tools like direct and indirect taxation and subsidies to have an equalizing impact on the economy. Moreover, the significant causal relationship from subsidies to Gini opens up an opportunity for the government to improve the income distribution using targeted subsidies, for example the Aadhaar-linked Direct Transfer Benefits etc.http://www.rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/files/articole/2017-04-02/3441/5giri.pdfEconomic inequalitytaxationsubsidieseconomic growthIndia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deven Bansod
Geetilaxmi Mohapatra
A. K. Giri
spellingShingle Deven Bansod
Geetilaxmi Mohapatra
A. K. Giri
Fiscal Policy, Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Case of Indian Economy
Romanian Economic Journal
Economic inequality
taxation
subsidies
economic growth
India
author_facet Deven Bansod
Geetilaxmi Mohapatra
A. K. Giri
author_sort Deven Bansod
title Fiscal Policy, Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Case of Indian Economy
title_short Fiscal Policy, Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Case of Indian Economy
title_full Fiscal Policy, Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Case of Indian Economy
title_fullStr Fiscal Policy, Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Case of Indian Economy
title_full_unstemmed Fiscal Policy, Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Case of Indian Economy
title_sort fiscal policy, economic growth and income inequality: a case of indian economy
publisher Editura ASE Bucuresti
series Romanian Economic Journal
issn 1454-4296
2286-2056
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Through this study, we try to evaluate the effects that the direct and indirect taxation and the subsidies provided by the Government have on income inequality. We use Gini coefficient as a measure of inequality and use annual data for Indian economy for years 1982-2015 and employ an ARDL-based bounds test approach for testing co-integration. We ascertain the stationarity properties for all the series, separately using the ADF test, the DF-GLS test and the KPSS test. We estimate the long-run and short-run coefficients and find that a long-run negative relationship exists between Gini coefficient and subsidy-related expenditure. The long-run coefficients of direct and indirect taxation terms are positive but are significant only at 10%. The short-run coefficients obtained from ECM show that a negative relationship exists between expenditure on subsidies and Gini coefficient. In short run, direct tax seems to have an insignificant positive coefficient while indirect tax seems to have a significant unbalancing effect. We employ the Granger causality tests to confirm direction of causality and find that there runs a unidirectional causality from direct tax, indirect tax and subsidy to Gini coefficient, while any causality from Gini to any series is largely insignificant. The results imply that the government should use the calculated hybrid of tools like direct and indirect taxation and subsidies to have an equalizing impact on the economy. Moreover, the significant causal relationship from subsidies to Gini opens up an opportunity for the government to improve the income distribution using targeted subsidies, for example the Aadhaar-linked Direct Transfer Benefits etc.
topic Economic inequality
taxation
subsidies
economic growth
India
url http://www.rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/files/articole/2017-04-02/3441/5giri.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT devenbansod fiscalpolicyeconomicgrowthandincomeinequalityacaseofindianeconomy
AT geetilaxmimohapatra fiscalpolicyeconomicgrowthandincomeinequalityacaseofindianeconomy
AT akgiri fiscalpolicyeconomicgrowthandincomeinequalityacaseofindianeconomy
_version_ 1716777996106334208