David vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody Fragments
Since the licensing of the first monoclonal antibody therapy in 1986, monoclonal antibodies have become the largest class of biopharmaceuticals with over 80 antibodies currently approved for a variety of disease indications. The development of smaller, antigen binding antibody fragments, derived fro...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Antibodies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4468/8/2/28 |
id |
doaj-1c8f9ec102914f76b294fde1865ed4db |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1c8f9ec102914f76b294fde1865ed4db2020-11-24T22:15:30ZengMDPI AGAntibodies2073-44682019-04-01822810.3390/antib8020028antib8020028David vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody FragmentsAdam Bates0Christine A. Power1Biopharm Molecular Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline, Hertfordshire SG1 2NY, UKBiopharm Molecular Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline, Hertfordshire SG1 2NY, UKSince the licensing of the first monoclonal antibody therapy in 1986, monoclonal antibodies have become the largest class of biopharmaceuticals with over 80 antibodies currently approved for a variety of disease indications. The development of smaller, antigen binding antibody fragments, derived from conventional antibodies or produced recombinantly, has been growing at a fast pace. Antibody fragments can be used on their own or linked to other molecules to generate numerous possibilities for bispecific, multi-specific, multimeric, or multifunctional molecules, and to achieve a variety of biological effects. They offer several advantages over full-length monoclonal antibodies, particularly a lower cost of goods, and because of their small size they can penetrate tissues, access challenging epitopes, and have potentially reduced immunogenicity. In this review, we will discuss the structure, production, and mechanism of action of EMA/FDA-approved fragments and of those in clinical and pre-clinical development. We will also discuss current topics of interest surrounding the potential use of antibody fragments for intracellular targeting and blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4468/8/2/28ADCantibody fragmentsBiTE<sup>®</sup>diabodiesdomain antibodiesfabImmTAC<sup>®</sup>Nanobody<sup>®</sup>scFvTandAbV-NAR |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adam Bates Christine A. Power |
spellingShingle |
Adam Bates Christine A. Power David vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody Fragments Antibodies ADC antibody fragments BiTE<sup>®</sup> diabodies domain antibodies fab ImmTAC<sup>®</sup> Nanobody<sup>®</sup> scFv TandAb V-NAR |
author_facet |
Adam Bates Christine A. Power |
author_sort |
Adam Bates |
title |
David vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody Fragments |
title_short |
David vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody Fragments |
title_full |
David vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody Fragments |
title_fullStr |
David vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody Fragments |
title_full_unstemmed |
David vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody Fragments |
title_sort |
david vs. goliath: the structure, function, and clinical prospects of antibody fragments |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Antibodies |
issn |
2073-4468 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Since the licensing of the first monoclonal antibody therapy in 1986, monoclonal antibodies have become the largest class of biopharmaceuticals with over 80 antibodies currently approved for a variety of disease indications. The development of smaller, antigen binding antibody fragments, derived from conventional antibodies or produced recombinantly, has been growing at a fast pace. Antibody fragments can be used on their own or linked to other molecules to generate numerous possibilities for bispecific, multi-specific, multimeric, or multifunctional molecules, and to achieve a variety of biological effects. They offer several advantages over full-length monoclonal antibodies, particularly a lower cost of goods, and because of their small size they can penetrate tissues, access challenging epitopes, and have potentially reduced immunogenicity. In this review, we will discuss the structure, production, and mechanism of action of EMA/FDA-approved fragments and of those in clinical and pre-clinical development. We will also discuss current topics of interest surrounding the potential use of antibody fragments for intracellular targeting and blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration. |
topic |
ADC antibody fragments BiTE<sup>®</sup> diabodies domain antibodies fab ImmTAC<sup>®</sup> Nanobody<sup>®</sup> scFv TandAb V-NAR |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4468/8/2/28 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adambates davidvsgoliaththestructurefunctionandclinicalprospectsofantibodyfragments AT christineapower davidvsgoliaththestructurefunctionandclinicalprospectsofantibodyfragments |
_version_ |
1725794069912748032 |