Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space

Abstract Interpersonal space (e.g., IPS) refers to the physical distance individuals maintain from others during social interactions, and into which intrusion by others can cause discomfort. Here, we asked whether the size of IPS is affected by manipulation of one’s own body representation. To addre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariano D’Angelo, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Francesca Frassinetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01441-9
id doaj-1c6ded12d8b64297857d876f7bb11fd2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1c6ded12d8b64297857d876f7bb11fd22020-12-08T02:10:58ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-05-01711910.1038/s41598-017-01441-9Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal spaceMariano D’Angelo0Giuseppe di Pellegrino1Francesca Frassinetti2Department of Psychology, University of BolognaDepartment of Psychology, University of BolognaDepartment of Psychology, University of BolognaAbstract Interpersonal space (e.g., IPS) refers to the physical distance individuals maintain from others during social interactions, and into which intrusion by others can cause discomfort. Here, we asked whether the size of IPS is affected by manipulation of one’s own body representation. To address this issue, in Experiment 1, IPS was measured through a comfort-distance task, before and after eliciting the illusion of owning an invisible body. To rule out a general, nonspecific change in space perception consequent the illusion, we also assessed peripersonal space, e.g., PPS, the area around the body used to act on nearby objects, through a reaching-distance task. Results showed that the experience of invisibility induces a selective contraction of IPS, without affecting the perceived reaching space around the body. In Experiment 2, a tool-use manipulation produced the opposite dissociation, modifying the boundaries of PPS, but leaving IPS distance unaltered. Collectively, these findings support a close relationship between IPS and the conscious representation of the body external appearance, i.e. the body image, and suggest the existence of two functionally separate representations of the space immediately surrounding the body in humans, which may form the basis of distinct processes engaged for different behavioural contexts.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01441-9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariano D’Angelo
Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Francesca Frassinetti
spellingShingle Mariano D’Angelo
Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Francesca Frassinetti
Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space
Scientific Reports
author_facet Mariano D’Angelo
Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Francesca Frassinetti
author_sort Mariano D’Angelo
title Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space
title_short Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space
title_full Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space
title_fullStr Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space
title_full_unstemmed Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space
title_sort invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Abstract Interpersonal space (e.g., IPS) refers to the physical distance individuals maintain from others during social interactions, and into which intrusion by others can cause discomfort. Here, we asked whether the size of IPS is affected by manipulation of one’s own body representation. To address this issue, in Experiment 1, IPS was measured through a comfort-distance task, before and after eliciting the illusion of owning an invisible body. To rule out a general, nonspecific change in space perception consequent the illusion, we also assessed peripersonal space, e.g., PPS, the area around the body used to act on nearby objects, through a reaching-distance task. Results showed that the experience of invisibility induces a selective contraction of IPS, without affecting the perceived reaching space around the body. In Experiment 2, a tool-use manipulation produced the opposite dissociation, modifying the boundaries of PPS, but leaving IPS distance unaltered. Collectively, these findings support a close relationship between IPS and the conscious representation of the body external appearance, i.e. the body image, and suggest the existence of two functionally separate representations of the space immediately surrounding the body in humans, which may form the basis of distinct processes engaged for different behavioural contexts.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01441-9
work_keys_str_mv AT marianodangelo invisiblebodyillusionmodulatesinterpersonalspace
AT giuseppedipellegrino invisiblebodyillusionmodulatesinterpersonalspace
AT francescafrassinetti invisiblebodyillusionmodulatesinterpersonalspace
_version_ 1724394045087678464