Three Footnotes to “Heavyweight Product Manager”

This paper suggests three footnotes regarding heavyweight product manager (HWPM). HWPM, a term coined by Fujimoto (1989), refers to powerful managers that act as both internal and external integrators. Footnote 1: Fujimoto (1989) used the term “product manager” for project managers responsible for p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kenichi KUWASHIMA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Global Business Research Center 2013-10-01
Series:Annals of Business Administrative Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/12/5/12_265/_pdf/-char/en
id doaj-1c6a3ca44b5e45c3af2ca52f8af10e6f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1c6a3ca44b5e45c3af2ca52f8af10e6f2021-03-21T09:13:26ZengGlobal Business Research CenterAnnals of Business Administrative Science1347-44641347-44562013-10-0112526527610.7880/abas.12.265abasThree Footnotes to “Heavyweight Product Manager”Kenichi KUWASHIMA0Graduate School of Economics, University of TokyoThis paper suggests three footnotes regarding heavyweight product manager (HWPM). HWPM, a term coined by Fujimoto (1989), refers to powerful managers that act as both internal and external integrators. Footnote 1: Fujimoto (1989) used the term “product manager” for project managers responsible for product development to emphasize their long-term and wide range of responsibilities and authority, which continue even after the completion of a product development project. Footnote 2: The list of internal integration index and external integration index used to measure HWPM and the organizational variables that comprise the two are given in the Appendix of Clark and Fujimoto (1991). However, the organizational variables noted as composition factors for these indices are misprints. In fact, it is necessary to reverse the organizational variables that refer to the indices. Footnote 3: Based on their empirical study, Clark and Fujimoto (1991) classify the following two cases as “lightweight product manager structures.” First is one in which “the degree of internal integration is high while that of external integration is low,” and second is when “the degree of internal integration is low while that of external integration is high.” However, the two product development organizations significantly differ. By classifying them, it is possible to glean deep insights into the relationship between the product development organization and product development performance.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/12/5/12_265/_pdf/-char/enproduct developmentorganizationperformance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenichi KUWASHIMA
spellingShingle Kenichi KUWASHIMA
Three Footnotes to “Heavyweight Product Manager”
Annals of Business Administrative Science
product development
organization
performance
author_facet Kenichi KUWASHIMA
author_sort Kenichi KUWASHIMA
title Three Footnotes to “Heavyweight Product Manager”
title_short Three Footnotes to “Heavyweight Product Manager”
title_full Three Footnotes to “Heavyweight Product Manager”
title_fullStr Three Footnotes to “Heavyweight Product Manager”
title_full_unstemmed Three Footnotes to “Heavyweight Product Manager”
title_sort three footnotes to “heavyweight product manager”
publisher Global Business Research Center
series Annals of Business Administrative Science
issn 1347-4464
1347-4456
publishDate 2013-10-01
description This paper suggests three footnotes regarding heavyweight product manager (HWPM). HWPM, a term coined by Fujimoto (1989), refers to powerful managers that act as both internal and external integrators. Footnote 1: Fujimoto (1989) used the term “product manager” for project managers responsible for product development to emphasize their long-term and wide range of responsibilities and authority, which continue even after the completion of a product development project. Footnote 2: The list of internal integration index and external integration index used to measure HWPM and the organizational variables that comprise the two are given in the Appendix of Clark and Fujimoto (1991). However, the organizational variables noted as composition factors for these indices are misprints. In fact, it is necessary to reverse the organizational variables that refer to the indices. Footnote 3: Based on their empirical study, Clark and Fujimoto (1991) classify the following two cases as “lightweight product manager structures.” First is one in which “the degree of internal integration is high while that of external integration is low,” and second is when “the degree of internal integration is low while that of external integration is high.” However, the two product development organizations significantly differ. By classifying them, it is possible to glean deep insights into the relationship between the product development organization and product development performance.
topic product development
organization
performance
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/12/5/12_265/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT kenichikuwashima threefootnotestoheavyweightproductmanager
_version_ 1724211043781050368