Redefining success: the political ecology of genetically modified and organic cotton as solutions to agrarian crisis

The transnational spread of law and technology in Indian agricultural development has passed through three distinct phases since the mid-19th century. In each case, a narrative of agrarian crisis allowed for new state and corporate interventions, conceived by American and British agribusiness, withi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrew Flachs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Libraries 2016-12-01
Series:Journal of Political Ecology
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20179
id doaj-1c441a42830741d5826bc887d4379c3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1c441a42830741d5826bc887d4379c3b2020-11-24T21:52:56ZengUniversity of Arizona LibrariesJournal of Political Ecology1073-04512016-12-01231497010.2458/v23i1.2017919651Redefining success: the political ecology of genetically modified and organic cotton as solutions to agrarian crisisAndrew Flachs0Washington University in St. LouisThe transnational spread of law and technology in Indian agricultural development has passed through three distinct phases since the mid-19th century. In each case, a narrative of agrarian crisis allowed for new state and corporate interventions, conceived by American and British agribusiness, within the existing logics of Indian smallholder agriculture. These begun with colonial British industrial cotton projects in the 1840s, continuing with Green Revolution agriculture, and on contemporary GM and organic cotton farms. In each case, farmers developed strategies through a frictive, contentious adoption of new technologies and built new avenues to success that worked for some farmers and failed for others. In this article I draw on ethnographic fieldwork and household surveys conducted in nine villages from 2012-2014 in Telangana, India. As with previous development initiatives, the US-born legal structures that defined high-tech GM and low-tech organic agriculture were adopted in India without major changes. I argue, however that their actual implementation by farmers has required a significant shift in the ways that people manage the agricultural economy. Keywords: Genetically Modified crops, organic agriculture, development, South India   This paper was winner of the Eric Wolf Prize, Political Ecology Society, 2015.https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20179
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew Flachs
spellingShingle Andrew Flachs
Redefining success: the political ecology of genetically modified and organic cotton as solutions to agrarian crisis
Journal of Political Ecology
author_facet Andrew Flachs
author_sort Andrew Flachs
title Redefining success: the political ecology of genetically modified and organic cotton as solutions to agrarian crisis
title_short Redefining success: the political ecology of genetically modified and organic cotton as solutions to agrarian crisis
title_full Redefining success: the political ecology of genetically modified and organic cotton as solutions to agrarian crisis
title_fullStr Redefining success: the political ecology of genetically modified and organic cotton as solutions to agrarian crisis
title_full_unstemmed Redefining success: the political ecology of genetically modified and organic cotton as solutions to agrarian crisis
title_sort redefining success: the political ecology of genetically modified and organic cotton as solutions to agrarian crisis
publisher University of Arizona Libraries
series Journal of Political Ecology
issn 1073-0451
publishDate 2016-12-01
description The transnational spread of law and technology in Indian agricultural development has passed through three distinct phases since the mid-19th century. In each case, a narrative of agrarian crisis allowed for new state and corporate interventions, conceived by American and British agribusiness, within the existing logics of Indian smallholder agriculture. These begun with colonial British industrial cotton projects in the 1840s, continuing with Green Revolution agriculture, and on contemporary GM and organic cotton farms. In each case, farmers developed strategies through a frictive, contentious adoption of new technologies and built new avenues to success that worked for some farmers and failed for others. In this article I draw on ethnographic fieldwork and household surveys conducted in nine villages from 2012-2014 in Telangana, India. As with previous development initiatives, the US-born legal structures that defined high-tech GM and low-tech organic agriculture were adopted in India without major changes. I argue, however that their actual implementation by farmers has required a significant shift in the ways that people manage the agricultural economy. Keywords: Genetically Modified crops, organic agriculture, development, South India   This paper was winner of the Eric Wolf Prize, Political Ecology Society, 2015.
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/20179
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewflachs redefiningsuccessthepoliticalecologyofgeneticallymodifiedandorganiccottonassolutionstoagrariancrisis
_version_ 1725874043063631872