Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting
Abstract Background We sought to develop a low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda utilizing either rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) or traditional debriefing, and to determine whether RCDP leads to greater improvement in simulation-based performance and in r...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4 |
id |
doaj-1c393bc7a4dc4f9aa82a73832470d08a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1c393bc7a4dc4f9aa82a73832470d08a2020-11-25T03:43:27ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202019-08-011911810.1186/s12909-019-1742-4Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited settingSamantha L. Rosman0Rosine Nyirasafari1Hippolyte Muhire Bwiza2Christian Umuhoza3Elizabeth A. Camp4Debra L. Weiner5Marideth C. Rus6Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Division of Emergency Medicine/Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Pediatrics, University of RwandaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of RwandaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of RwandaDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine/ Texas Children’s HospitalDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Division of Emergency Medicine/Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine/ Texas Children’s HospitalAbstract Background We sought to develop a low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda utilizing either rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) or traditional debriefing, and to determine whether RCDP leads to greater improvement in simulation-based performance and in resident confidence compared with traditional debriefing. Methods Pediatric residents at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK) were randomly assigned to RCDP or traditional simulation and completed a 6 month-long simulation-based curriculum designed to improve pediatric resuscitation skills. Pre- and post- performance was assessed using a modified version of the Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT). Each video-taped simulation was reviewed by two investigators and inter-rater reliability was assessed. Self-confidence in resuscitation, pre- and post-simulation, was assessed by Likert scale survey. Analyses were conducted using parametric and non-parametric testing, ANCOVA and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Results There was a 21% increase in pre- to post-test performance in both groups (p < 0.001), but no difference between groups (mean difference − 0.003%; p 0.94). Inter-rater reliability was exceptional with both pre and post ICCs ≥0.95 (p < 0.001). Overall, self-confidence scores improved from pre to post (24.0 vs. 30.0 respectively, p < 0.001), however, the there was no difference between the RCDP and traditional groups. Conclusions Completion of a six-month low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda led to statistically significant improvement in performance on a simulated resuscitation. RCDP and traditional low-fidelity simulation-based instruction may both be valuable tools to improve resuscitation skills in pediatric residents in resource-limited settings.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4Rapid cycle deliberate practiceSimulationPediatricsLow-fidelityResource-limitedResuscitation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Samantha L. Rosman Rosine Nyirasafari Hippolyte Muhire Bwiza Christian Umuhoza Elizabeth A. Camp Debra L. Weiner Marideth C. Rus |
spellingShingle |
Samantha L. Rosman Rosine Nyirasafari Hippolyte Muhire Bwiza Christian Umuhoza Elizabeth A. Camp Debra L. Weiner Marideth C. Rus Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting BMC Medical Education Rapid cycle deliberate practice Simulation Pediatrics Low-fidelity Resource-limited Resuscitation |
author_facet |
Samantha L. Rosman Rosine Nyirasafari Hippolyte Muhire Bwiza Christian Umuhoza Elizabeth A. Camp Debra L. Weiner Marideth C. Rus |
author_sort |
Samantha L. Rosman |
title |
Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_short |
Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_full |
Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_fullStr |
Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
title_sort |
rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Education |
issn |
1472-6920 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background We sought to develop a low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda utilizing either rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) or traditional debriefing, and to determine whether RCDP leads to greater improvement in simulation-based performance and in resident confidence compared with traditional debriefing. Methods Pediatric residents at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK) were randomly assigned to RCDP or traditional simulation and completed a 6 month-long simulation-based curriculum designed to improve pediatric resuscitation skills. Pre- and post- performance was assessed using a modified version of the Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT). Each video-taped simulation was reviewed by two investigators and inter-rater reliability was assessed. Self-confidence in resuscitation, pre- and post-simulation, was assessed by Likert scale survey. Analyses were conducted using parametric and non-parametric testing, ANCOVA and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Results There was a 21% increase in pre- to post-test performance in both groups (p < 0.001), but no difference between groups (mean difference − 0.003%; p 0.94). Inter-rater reliability was exceptional with both pre and post ICCs ≥0.95 (p < 0.001). Overall, self-confidence scores improved from pre to post (24.0 vs. 30.0 respectively, p < 0.001), however, the there was no difference between the RCDP and traditional groups. Conclusions Completion of a six-month low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda led to statistically significant improvement in performance on a simulated resuscitation. RCDP and traditional low-fidelity simulation-based instruction may both be valuable tools to improve resuscitation skills in pediatric residents in resource-limited settings. |
topic |
Rapid cycle deliberate practice Simulation Pediatrics Low-fidelity Resource-limited Resuscitation |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT samanthalrosman rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT rosinenyirasafari rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT hippolytemuhirebwiza rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT christianumuhoza rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT elizabethacamp rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT debralweiner rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting AT maridethcrus rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting |
_version_ |
1724519836497739776 |