Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting

Abstract Background We sought to develop a low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda utilizing either rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) or traditional debriefing, and to determine whether RCDP leads to greater improvement in simulation-based performance and in r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samantha L. Rosman, Rosine Nyirasafari, Hippolyte Muhire Bwiza, Christian Umuhoza, Elizabeth A. Camp, Debra L. Weiner, Marideth C. Rus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4
id doaj-1c393bc7a4dc4f9aa82a73832470d08a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1c393bc7a4dc4f9aa82a73832470d08a2020-11-25T03:43:27ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202019-08-011911810.1186/s12909-019-1742-4Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited settingSamantha L. Rosman0Rosine Nyirasafari1Hippolyte Muhire Bwiza2Christian Umuhoza3Elizabeth A. Camp4Debra L. Weiner5Marideth C. Rus6Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Division of Emergency Medicine/Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Pediatrics, University of RwandaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of RwandaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of RwandaDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine/ Texas Children’s HospitalDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Division of Emergency Medicine/Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine/ Texas Children’s HospitalAbstract Background We sought to develop a low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda utilizing either rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) or traditional debriefing, and to determine whether RCDP leads to greater improvement in simulation-based performance and in resident confidence compared with traditional debriefing. Methods Pediatric residents at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK) were randomly assigned to RCDP or traditional simulation and completed a 6 month-long simulation-based curriculum designed to improve pediatric resuscitation skills. Pre- and post- performance was assessed using a modified version of the Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT). Each video-taped simulation was reviewed by two investigators and inter-rater reliability was assessed. Self-confidence in resuscitation, pre- and post-simulation, was assessed by Likert scale survey. Analyses were conducted using parametric and non-parametric testing, ANCOVA and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Results There was a 21% increase in pre- to post-test performance in both groups (p < 0.001), but no difference between groups (mean difference − 0.003%; p 0.94). Inter-rater reliability was exceptional with both pre and post ICCs ≥0.95 (p < 0.001). Overall, self-confidence scores improved from pre to post (24.0 vs. 30.0 respectively, p < 0.001), however, the there was no difference between the RCDP and traditional groups. Conclusions Completion of a six-month low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda led to statistically significant improvement in performance on a simulated resuscitation. RCDP and traditional low-fidelity simulation-based instruction may both be valuable tools to improve resuscitation skills in pediatric residents in resource-limited settings.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4Rapid cycle deliberate practiceSimulationPediatricsLow-fidelityResource-limitedResuscitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samantha L. Rosman
Rosine Nyirasafari
Hippolyte Muhire Bwiza
Christian Umuhoza
Elizabeth A. Camp
Debra L. Weiner
Marideth C. Rus
spellingShingle Samantha L. Rosman
Rosine Nyirasafari
Hippolyte Muhire Bwiza
Christian Umuhoza
Elizabeth A. Camp
Debra L. Weiner
Marideth C. Rus
Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting
BMC Medical Education
Rapid cycle deliberate practice
Simulation
Pediatrics
Low-fidelity
Resource-limited
Resuscitation
author_facet Samantha L. Rosman
Rosine Nyirasafari
Hippolyte Muhire Bwiza
Christian Umuhoza
Elizabeth A. Camp
Debra L. Weiner
Marideth C. Rus
author_sort Samantha L. Rosman
title Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting
title_short Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting
title_full Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting
title_fullStr Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting
title_full_unstemmed Rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting
title_sort rapid cycle deliberate practice vs. traditional simulation in a resource-limited setting
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract Background We sought to develop a low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda utilizing either rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) or traditional debriefing, and to determine whether RCDP leads to greater improvement in simulation-based performance and in resident confidence compared with traditional debriefing. Methods Pediatric residents at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK) were randomly assigned to RCDP or traditional simulation and completed a 6 month-long simulation-based curriculum designed to improve pediatric resuscitation skills. Pre- and post- performance was assessed using a modified version of the Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT). Each video-taped simulation was reviewed by two investigators and inter-rater reliability was assessed. Self-confidence in resuscitation, pre- and post-simulation, was assessed by Likert scale survey. Analyses were conducted using parametric and non-parametric testing, ANCOVA and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Results There was a 21% increase in pre- to post-test performance in both groups (p < 0.001), but no difference between groups (mean difference − 0.003%; p 0.94). Inter-rater reliability was exceptional with both pre and post ICCs ≥0.95 (p < 0.001). Overall, self-confidence scores improved from pre to post (24.0 vs. 30.0 respectively, p < 0.001), however, the there was no difference between the RCDP and traditional groups. Conclusions Completion of a six-month low-fidelity simulation-based curriculum for pediatric residents in Rwanda led to statistically significant improvement in performance on a simulated resuscitation. RCDP and traditional low-fidelity simulation-based instruction may both be valuable tools to improve resuscitation skills in pediatric residents in resource-limited settings.
topic Rapid cycle deliberate practice
Simulation
Pediatrics
Low-fidelity
Resource-limited
Resuscitation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-019-1742-4
work_keys_str_mv AT samanthalrosman rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT rosinenyirasafari rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT hippolytemuhirebwiza rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT christianumuhoza rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT elizabethacamp rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT debralweiner rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting
AT maridethcrus rapidcycledeliberatepracticevstraditionalsimulationinaresourcelimitedsetting
_version_ 1724519836497739776