Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance

Inclusion of assessment of teaching competence in Mindfulness-Based Program (MBP) teacher training enables international benchmarking of standards, which in turn underpins the integrity of this emerging field and the potential to deliver effective, transformative interventions. However, there is a r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca Crane PhD, Lynn Koerbel MPH, Sophie Sansom PhD, Alison Yiangou MA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-11-01
Series:Global Advances in Health and Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2164956120973627
id doaj-1c067793fc534fa187b931b532e3daec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1c067793fc534fa187b931b532e3daec2020-11-25T04:06:19ZengSAGE PublishingGlobal Advances in Health and Medicine2164-95612020-11-01910.1177/2164956120973627Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice GuidanceRebecca Crane PhDLynn Koerbel MPHSophie Sansom PhDAlison Yiangou MAInclusion of assessment of teaching competence in Mindfulness-Based Program (MBP) teacher training enables international benchmarking of standards, which in turn underpins the integrity of this emerging field and the potential to deliver effective, transformative interventions. However, there is a risk that the inclusion of competence assessment could lead to reductionism and undermining of the pedagogical features that make mindfulness-based teaching distinct. It can also make the costs of training prohibitive. The science underpinning the integrity of competence assessment is not yet robust enough to justify wide scale implementation, but when feasible, including the option for assessment enables trainees to engage in rigorous and effective training processes. When assessment is included, it is critically important that the process is held with awareness and sensitivity, and is implemented by experienced assessors with thoughtful governance. Navigating these issues involves balancing rigour with accessibility and pragmatism. This paper lays out some guidelines for good practice for MBP teaching assessment, and raises unresolved dilemmas and questions.https://doi.org/10.1177/2164956120973627
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rebecca Crane PhD
Lynn Koerbel MPH
Sophie Sansom PhD
Alison Yiangou MA
spellingShingle Rebecca Crane PhD
Lynn Koerbel MPH
Sophie Sansom PhD
Alison Yiangou MA
Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance
Global Advances in Health and Medicine
author_facet Rebecca Crane PhD
Lynn Koerbel MPH
Sophie Sansom PhD
Alison Yiangou MA
author_sort Rebecca Crane PhD
title Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance
title_short Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance
title_full Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance
title_fullStr Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Mindfulness-Based Teaching Competence: Good Practice Guidance
title_sort assessing mindfulness-based teaching competence: good practice guidance
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Global Advances in Health and Medicine
issn 2164-9561
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Inclusion of assessment of teaching competence in Mindfulness-Based Program (MBP) teacher training enables international benchmarking of standards, which in turn underpins the integrity of this emerging field and the potential to deliver effective, transformative interventions. However, there is a risk that the inclusion of competence assessment could lead to reductionism and undermining of the pedagogical features that make mindfulness-based teaching distinct. It can also make the costs of training prohibitive. The science underpinning the integrity of competence assessment is not yet robust enough to justify wide scale implementation, but when feasible, including the option for assessment enables trainees to engage in rigorous and effective training processes. When assessment is included, it is critically important that the process is held with awareness and sensitivity, and is implemented by experienced assessors with thoughtful governance. Navigating these issues involves balancing rigour with accessibility and pragmatism. This paper lays out some guidelines for good practice for MBP teaching assessment, and raises unresolved dilemmas and questions.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2164956120973627
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccacranephd assessingmindfulnessbasedteachingcompetencegoodpracticeguidance
AT lynnkoerbelmph assessingmindfulnessbasedteachingcompetencegoodpracticeguidance
AT sophiesansomphd assessingmindfulnessbasedteachingcompetencegoodpracticeguidance
AT alisonyiangouma assessingmindfulnessbasedteachingcompetencegoodpracticeguidance
_version_ 1724431529874030592