Pediatric visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis in Tunisia: comparative study between optimised PCR assays and parasitological methods

• Main Authors: Kaouech E., Kallel K., Toumi N.H., Belhadj S., Anane S., Babba H., Chaker E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: EDP Sciences 2008-06-01
• Series: Parasite
• Subjects: visceral leishmaniasis; PCR; direct examination; leukocytoconcentration; culture; blood; bone marrow; Tunisia
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2008152143
• ISSN: 1252-607X; 1776-1042

There has been a steady increase of visceral leishmaniasis during the past 20 years in Tunisia. In this study, we assess the value of two optimised PCR versus those of classical methods for the diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis. 106 samples were collected from 53 cases of pediatric visceral leishmaniasis. Peripheral blood and bone marrow samples were analysed both by parasitological methods (direct examination, leukocytoconcentration (LCC) and culture) and by PCR methods with two primer pair (R221/R332 and Lei 70L/Lei 70R). We diagnosed visceral leishmaniasis in all patients: 44 cases were diagnosed by culture (83%), 42 by direct examination of bone marrow (79%), 17 by LCC (32%), and 53 positive cases with both PCR assays (R221/R332 and/or Lei 70L/Lei 70R) (100%). Regarding each PCR assay, for blood samples, the difference between the sensitivities of PCR Lei 70L/Lei 70R (86,8%) and PCR R221/R332 (17%) is statistically significant with p-value 0.025. For bone marrow, the sensitivities of the two PCR methods were respectively 96,2% (Lei 70L/Lei 70R) and 75,5% (R221/R332). On the whole, PCR Lei 70L/Lei 70R was more effective than PCR R221/R332 and conventional methods for the two biological samples. Moreover, the requirement of less invasive sample using blood has the advantage of being repeatable for screening and for post therapeutic monitoring.