Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use

Electric vehicles (EVs) can be considered an alternative technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. However, numerous barriers need to be overcome in this regard. This study is aimed at presenting the framework for the identification and analysis of barriers against...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madhusudhan Adhikari, Laxman Prasad Ghimire, Yeonbae Kim, Prakash Aryal, Sundar Bahadur Khadka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4850
id doaj-1bf9c626051b4e0395e6cafa3717b71e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1bf9c626051b4e0395e6cafa3717b71e2020-11-25T02:39:55ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-06-01124850485010.3390/su12124850Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle UseMadhusudhan Adhikari0Laxman Prasad Ghimire1Yeonbae Kim2Prakash Aryal3Sundar Bahadur Khadka4Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC), Kathmandu 44600, NepalAlternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC), Kathmandu 44600, NepalTechnology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP) and Graduate School of Engineering Practice, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, KoreaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, AustraliaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 44600, NepalElectric vehicles (EVs) can be considered an alternative technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. However, numerous barriers need to be overcome in this regard. This study is aimed at presenting the framework for the identification and analysis of barriers against the use of EVs. Then, the framework was applied to identify the challenges and rank them in order of importance against the diffusion of EVs in Nepal. Seventeen barriers were identified from previous studies, reports, policy documents, and interactions with experts. The identified barriers were classified into five categories: technical, policy, economic, infrastructure, and social. Then, a comparative survey was performed to obtain experts’ opinions on the identified barriers and the analytical hierarchical process was used to analyze and rank them. The results revealed that infrastructure, policy, economic, and technical barriers pose more pressing concerns than social barriers. The lack of charging stations, relatively higher purchase price of EVs compared to internal combustion vehicles, and poor long-term planning and goal setting on the part of the government were ranked as the top three barriers against EV uptake in Nepal. This framework can be applied to replicate the study in other countries, taking their inherent relevant factors into account.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4850electric vehiclesbarriersanalytical hierarchical process
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madhusudhan Adhikari
Laxman Prasad Ghimire
Yeonbae Kim
Prakash Aryal
Sundar Bahadur Khadka
spellingShingle Madhusudhan Adhikari
Laxman Prasad Ghimire
Yeonbae Kim
Prakash Aryal
Sundar Bahadur Khadka
Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use
Sustainability
electric vehicles
barriers
analytical hierarchical process
author_facet Madhusudhan Adhikari
Laxman Prasad Ghimire
Yeonbae Kim
Prakash Aryal
Sundar Bahadur Khadka
author_sort Madhusudhan Adhikari
title Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use
title_short Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use
title_full Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use
title_fullStr Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use
title_full_unstemmed Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use
title_sort identification and analysis of barriers against electric vehicle use
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Electric vehicles (EVs) can be considered an alternative technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. However, numerous barriers need to be overcome in this regard. This study is aimed at presenting the framework for the identification and analysis of barriers against the use of EVs. Then, the framework was applied to identify the challenges and rank them in order of importance against the diffusion of EVs in Nepal. Seventeen barriers were identified from previous studies, reports, policy documents, and interactions with experts. The identified barriers were classified into five categories: technical, policy, economic, infrastructure, and social. Then, a comparative survey was performed to obtain experts’ opinions on the identified barriers and the analytical hierarchical process was used to analyze and rank them. The results revealed that infrastructure, policy, economic, and technical barriers pose more pressing concerns than social barriers. The lack of charging stations, relatively higher purchase price of EVs compared to internal combustion vehicles, and poor long-term planning and goal setting on the part of the government were ranked as the top three barriers against EV uptake in Nepal. This framework can be applied to replicate the study in other countries, taking their inherent relevant factors into account.
topic electric vehicles
barriers
analytical hierarchical process
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4850
work_keys_str_mv AT madhusudhanadhikari identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse
AT laxmanprasadghimire identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse
AT yeonbaekim identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse
AT prakasharyal identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse
AT sundarbahadurkhadka identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse
_version_ 1724783979553357824