Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use
Electric vehicles (EVs) can be considered an alternative technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. However, numerous barriers need to be overcome in this regard. This study is aimed at presenting the framework for the identification and analysis of barriers against...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4850 |
id |
doaj-1bf9c626051b4e0395e6cafa3717b71e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1bf9c626051b4e0395e6cafa3717b71e2020-11-25T02:39:55ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-06-01124850485010.3390/su12124850Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle UseMadhusudhan Adhikari0Laxman Prasad Ghimire1Yeonbae Kim2Prakash Aryal3Sundar Bahadur Khadka4Alternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC), Kathmandu 44600, NepalAlternative Energy Promotion Center (AEPC), Kathmandu 44600, NepalTechnology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP) and Graduate School of Engineering Practice, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, KoreaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, AustraliaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 44600, NepalElectric vehicles (EVs) can be considered an alternative technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. However, numerous barriers need to be overcome in this regard. This study is aimed at presenting the framework for the identification and analysis of barriers against the use of EVs. Then, the framework was applied to identify the challenges and rank them in order of importance against the diffusion of EVs in Nepal. Seventeen barriers were identified from previous studies, reports, policy documents, and interactions with experts. The identified barriers were classified into five categories: technical, policy, economic, infrastructure, and social. Then, a comparative survey was performed to obtain experts’ opinions on the identified barriers and the analytical hierarchical process was used to analyze and rank them. The results revealed that infrastructure, policy, economic, and technical barriers pose more pressing concerns than social barriers. The lack of charging stations, relatively higher purchase price of EVs compared to internal combustion vehicles, and poor long-term planning and goal setting on the part of the government were ranked as the top three barriers against EV uptake in Nepal. This framework can be applied to replicate the study in other countries, taking their inherent relevant factors into account.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4850electric vehiclesbarriersanalytical hierarchical process |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Madhusudhan Adhikari Laxman Prasad Ghimire Yeonbae Kim Prakash Aryal Sundar Bahadur Khadka |
spellingShingle |
Madhusudhan Adhikari Laxman Prasad Ghimire Yeonbae Kim Prakash Aryal Sundar Bahadur Khadka Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use Sustainability electric vehicles barriers analytical hierarchical process |
author_facet |
Madhusudhan Adhikari Laxman Prasad Ghimire Yeonbae Kim Prakash Aryal Sundar Bahadur Khadka |
author_sort |
Madhusudhan Adhikari |
title |
Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use |
title_short |
Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use |
title_full |
Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use |
title_fullStr |
Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identification and Analysis of Barriers against Electric Vehicle Use |
title_sort |
identification and analysis of barriers against electric vehicle use |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Electric vehicles (EVs) can be considered an alternative technology to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. However, numerous barriers need to be overcome in this regard. This study is aimed at presenting the framework for the identification and analysis of barriers against the use of EVs. Then, the framework was applied to identify the challenges and rank them in order of importance against the diffusion of EVs in Nepal. Seventeen barriers were identified from previous studies, reports, policy documents, and interactions with experts. The identified barriers were classified into five categories: technical, policy, economic, infrastructure, and social. Then, a comparative survey was performed to obtain experts’ opinions on the identified barriers and the analytical hierarchical process was used to analyze and rank them. The results revealed that infrastructure, policy, economic, and technical barriers pose more pressing concerns than social barriers. The lack of charging stations, relatively higher purchase price of EVs compared to internal combustion vehicles, and poor long-term planning and goal setting on the part of the government were ranked as the top three barriers against EV uptake in Nepal. This framework can be applied to replicate the study in other countries, taking their inherent relevant factors into account. |
topic |
electric vehicles barriers analytical hierarchical process |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4850 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT madhusudhanadhikari identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse AT laxmanprasadghimire identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse AT yeonbaekim identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse AT prakasharyal identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse AT sundarbahadurkhadka identificationandanalysisofbarriersagainstelectricvehicleuse |
_version_ |
1724783979553357824 |