Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children

Objective: End-stage renal disease is a health problem that consumes public and private resources. This study aimed to identify the cost of hemodialysis (either daily or conventional hemodialysis) and transplantation in children and adolescents. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of pediatric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Fernanda Carvalho de Camargo, Klenio de Souza Barbosa, Seiji Kumon Fetter, Ana Bastos, Luciana de Santis Feltran, Paulo Cesar Koch-Nogueira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-01-01
Series:Jornal de Pediatria
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755716302066
id doaj-1bf637c1ac914a558af36c28f979cdbd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1bf637c1ac914a558af36c28f979cdbd2020-11-25T02:45:06ZengElsevierJornal de Pediatria0021-75572018-01-019419399Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in childrenMaria Fernanda Carvalho de Camargo0Klenio de Souza Barbosa1Seiji Kumon Fetter2Ana Bastos3Luciana de Santis Feltran4Paulo Cesar Koch-Nogueira5Hospital Samaritano, São Paulo, SP, BrazilInstituto de Educação e Pesquisa (Insper), São Paulo, SP, BrazilFundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV), São Paulo, SP, BrazilHospital Samaritano, São Paulo, SP, BrazilHospital Samaritano, São Paulo, SP, BrazilHospital Samaritano, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Corresponding author.Objective: End-stage renal disease is a health problem that consumes public and private resources. This study aimed to identify the cost of hemodialysis (either daily or conventional hemodialysis) and transplantation in children and adolescents. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients with End-stage renal disease who underwent hemodialysis followed by kidney transplant. All costs incurred in the treatment were collected and the monthly total cost was calculated per patient and for each renal therapy. Subsequently, a dynamic panel data model was estimated. Results: The study included 30 children who underwent hemodialysis (16 conventional/14 daily hemodialysis) followed by renal transplantation. The mean monthly outlay for hemodialysis was USD 3500 and USD 1900 for transplant. Hemodialysis costs added up to over USD 87,000 in 40 months for conventional dialysis patients and USD 131,000 in 50 months for daily dialysis patients. In turn, transplant costs in 50 months reached USD 48,000 and USD 70,000, for conventional and daily dialysis patients, respectively. For conventional dialysis patients, transplant is less costly when therapy exceeds 16 months, whereas for daily dialysis patients, the threshold is around 13 months. Conclusion: Transplantation is less expensive than dialysis in children, and the estimated thresholds indicate that renal transplant should be the preferred treatment for pediatric patients. Resumo: Objetivo: A Doença Renal em Estágio Final é um problema de saúde que consome recursos públicos e privados. Nosso objetivo é identificar o custo da hemodiálise (hemodiálise diarias ou convencional) e transplante em crianças e adolescentes. Métodos: Uma coorte retrospectiva de pacientes pediátricos com Doença Renal em Estágio Final (DREF) submetidos à hemodiálise após transplante de rim. Todos os custos incorridos no tratamento foram cobrados e o custo total mensal foi calculado por paciente e por cada terapia renal. Então, foi estimado um modelo dinâmico com dados em painel. Resultados: Estudamos 30 crianças submetidas à hemodiálise (16 hemodiálises convencionais/14 hemodiálises diárias) após transplante renal. O gasto médio mensal para hemodiálise foi US$3,5 mil e US$1,9 mil para transplante. Os custos de hemodiálise somam mais de US$87 mil em 40 meses para pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise convencional (HC) e US$131 mil em 50 meses para pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise diária (HD). Por outro lado, os custos de transplante em 50 meses atingem US$48 e US$70 mil, para pacientes submetidos a HC e HD, respectivamente. Para pacientes submetidos à hemodiálise convencional, o transplante é menos oneroso quando a terapia ultrapassa 16 meses, ao passo que para pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise diária o limiar é cerca de 13 meses. Conclusão: O transplante é menos caro que a diálise em crianças e os limiares estimados indicam que o transplante renal deve ser o tratamento preferencial para pacientes pediátricos. Keywords: Economics, Kidney transplantation, Renal dialysis, Pediatrics, Palavras-chave: Economia, Transplante renal, Diálise renal, Pediatriahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755716302066
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Fernanda Carvalho de Camargo
Klenio de Souza Barbosa
Seiji Kumon Fetter
Ana Bastos
Luciana de Santis Feltran
Paulo Cesar Koch-Nogueira
spellingShingle Maria Fernanda Carvalho de Camargo
Klenio de Souza Barbosa
Seiji Kumon Fetter
Ana Bastos
Luciana de Santis Feltran
Paulo Cesar Koch-Nogueira
Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children
Jornal de Pediatria
author_facet Maria Fernanda Carvalho de Camargo
Klenio de Souza Barbosa
Seiji Kumon Fetter
Ana Bastos
Luciana de Santis Feltran
Paulo Cesar Koch-Nogueira
author_sort Maria Fernanda Carvalho de Camargo
title Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children
title_short Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children
title_full Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children
title_fullStr Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children
title_full_unstemmed Cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children
title_sort cost analysis of substitutive renal therapies in children
publisher Elsevier
series Jornal de Pediatria
issn 0021-7557
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Objective: End-stage renal disease is a health problem that consumes public and private resources. This study aimed to identify the cost of hemodialysis (either daily or conventional hemodialysis) and transplantation in children and adolescents. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients with End-stage renal disease who underwent hemodialysis followed by kidney transplant. All costs incurred in the treatment were collected and the monthly total cost was calculated per patient and for each renal therapy. Subsequently, a dynamic panel data model was estimated. Results: The study included 30 children who underwent hemodialysis (16 conventional/14 daily hemodialysis) followed by renal transplantation. The mean monthly outlay for hemodialysis was USD 3500 and USD 1900 for transplant. Hemodialysis costs added up to over USD 87,000 in 40 months for conventional dialysis patients and USD 131,000 in 50 months for daily dialysis patients. In turn, transplant costs in 50 months reached USD 48,000 and USD 70,000, for conventional and daily dialysis patients, respectively. For conventional dialysis patients, transplant is less costly when therapy exceeds 16 months, whereas for daily dialysis patients, the threshold is around 13 months. Conclusion: Transplantation is less expensive than dialysis in children, and the estimated thresholds indicate that renal transplant should be the preferred treatment for pediatric patients. Resumo: Objetivo: A Doença Renal em Estágio Final é um problema de saúde que consome recursos públicos e privados. Nosso objetivo é identificar o custo da hemodiálise (hemodiálise diarias ou convencional) e transplante em crianças e adolescentes. Métodos: Uma coorte retrospectiva de pacientes pediátricos com Doença Renal em Estágio Final (DREF) submetidos à hemodiálise após transplante de rim. Todos os custos incorridos no tratamento foram cobrados e o custo total mensal foi calculado por paciente e por cada terapia renal. Então, foi estimado um modelo dinâmico com dados em painel. Resultados: Estudamos 30 crianças submetidas à hemodiálise (16 hemodiálises convencionais/14 hemodiálises diárias) após transplante renal. O gasto médio mensal para hemodiálise foi US$3,5 mil e US$1,9 mil para transplante. Os custos de hemodiálise somam mais de US$87 mil em 40 meses para pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise convencional (HC) e US$131 mil em 50 meses para pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise diária (HD). Por outro lado, os custos de transplante em 50 meses atingem US$48 e US$70 mil, para pacientes submetidos a HC e HD, respectivamente. Para pacientes submetidos à hemodiálise convencional, o transplante é menos oneroso quando a terapia ultrapassa 16 meses, ao passo que para pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise diária o limiar é cerca de 13 meses. Conclusão: O transplante é menos caro que a diálise em crianças e os limiares estimados indicam que o transplante renal deve ser o tratamento preferencial para pacientes pediátricos. Keywords: Economics, Kidney transplantation, Renal dialysis, Pediatrics, Palavras-chave: Economia, Transplante renal, Diálise renal, Pediatria
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755716302066
work_keys_str_mv AT mariafernandacarvalhodecamargo costanalysisofsubstitutiverenaltherapiesinchildren
AT kleniodesouzabarbosa costanalysisofsubstitutiverenaltherapiesinchildren
AT seijikumonfetter costanalysisofsubstitutiverenaltherapiesinchildren
AT anabastos costanalysisofsubstitutiverenaltherapiesinchildren
AT lucianadesantisfeltran costanalysisofsubstitutiverenaltherapiesinchildren
AT paulocesarkochnogueira costanalysisofsubstitutiverenaltherapiesinchildren
_version_ 1724764216023318528