Implications of Left Bundle Branch Block in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: Propensity Match Analysis from the National Inpatient Sample

• Main Authors: Dipesh Ludhwani, Mouyyad Rahaby, Vasu Patel, Saad Jamil, Adam Kedzia, Chunyi Wu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2019-07-01
• Series: Cardiology and Therapy
• Subjects: Arrhythmia; Conduction disorders; Left bundle branch block; Stress cardiomyopathy; Takotsubo cardiomyopathy
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40119-019-0141-6

Abstract Introduction Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC), also called stress cardiomyopathy, is a transient reversible left ventricular dysfunction mimicking acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Studies have shown similar rates of in-hospital complications in TTC and myocardial infarction (MI). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with increased mortality in patients with MI; however, similar studies comparing outcomes of TTC in the presence of LBBB are lacking. Methods The 2016 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried to identify all admissions with a primary discharge diagnosis of TTC. Diagnosis-specific codes were used to stratify patients based on the presence or absence of LBBB. Both population sets were paired using 1:10 propensity score matching. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to compare various in-hospital outcomes among both groups. Results Amongst 7270 admissions for TTC, 226 patients had concomitant LBBB. After performing 1:10 propensity matching, 130 patients with LBBB were compared to 1275 patients without LBBB. The presence of LBBB was associated with increased odds of cardiogenic shock (AOR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.21–3.99, p = 0.0097); ventricular arrhythmia (AOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.11–3.57, p = 0.02), acute congestive heart failure (AOR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.01–2.2, p = 0.04), and sudden cardiac arrest (AOR = 3.37, 95% CI 1.59–7.13, p = 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality, however a trend towards worsening was noted. Conclusions The incidence of arrhythmia and shock in patients with TTC does not correlate with the extent of myocardium involvement. The presence of LBBB in such cases can help recognize at-risk populations, and with timely intervention, life-threatening complications can be avoided. Despite limitations of the dataset and inability to establish causality, prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted.