Mammary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Fresh Look at Architectural Patterns

Mammary ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), a malignant appearing lesion on cytological and histological grounds, is in fact a non-obligate precancer. DCIS is difficult to manage and is sometimes treated more aggressively than invasive carcinoma. Although most DCIS classifications take into account the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel Scripcaru, Ibrahim M. Zardawi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Surgical Oncology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/979521
id doaj-1b9bcb9bc5734cf5a69669eece663692
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b9bcb9bc5734cf5a69669eece6636922020-11-24T23:29:26ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Surgical Oncology2090-14022090-14102012-01-01201210.1155/2012/979521979521Mammary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Fresh Look at Architectural PatternsGabriel Scripcaru0Ibrahim M. Zardawi1Department of Pathology, Royal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, NT 2011, AustraliaPathology North, Taree, NSW 2430, AustraliaMammary ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), a malignant appearing lesion on cytological and histological grounds, is in fact a non-obligate precancer. DCIS is difficult to manage and is sometimes treated more aggressively than invasive carcinoma. Although most DCIS classifications take into account the architectural growth pattern, when it comes to architecture, the literature is full of contradictory information. We examined 289 breast cancers and found DCIS in 265 of the cases. The majority of the DCIS cases were seen in the setting of invasive cancer and only 9% of the cases represented pure DCIS with no invasive cancer. The DCIS commonly displayed a mixed pattern with micropapillary, cribriform and solid components with the micropapillary type being the rarest, occurring seldom on its own. A continuum of growth with a micropapillary pattern evolving into a cribriform type could be seen in some of the cases. This may explain some of the conflicting information, in the literature, regarding the different architectural types of DCIS. The comedo-pattern of necrosis could be seen in all types of DCIS. We therefore conclude that the study of the determinants of growth pattern in DCIS would be the key to unravelling the diverse, often non-concordant evidence one encounters in the literature.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/979521
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gabriel Scripcaru
Ibrahim M. Zardawi
spellingShingle Gabriel Scripcaru
Ibrahim M. Zardawi
Mammary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Fresh Look at Architectural Patterns
International Journal of Surgical Oncology
author_facet Gabriel Scripcaru
Ibrahim M. Zardawi
author_sort Gabriel Scripcaru
title Mammary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Fresh Look at Architectural Patterns
title_short Mammary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Fresh Look at Architectural Patterns
title_full Mammary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Fresh Look at Architectural Patterns
title_fullStr Mammary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Fresh Look at Architectural Patterns
title_full_unstemmed Mammary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Fresh Look at Architectural Patterns
title_sort mammary ductal carcinoma in situ: a fresh look at architectural patterns
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Surgical Oncology
issn 2090-1402
2090-1410
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Mammary ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), a malignant appearing lesion on cytological and histological grounds, is in fact a non-obligate precancer. DCIS is difficult to manage and is sometimes treated more aggressively than invasive carcinoma. Although most DCIS classifications take into account the architectural growth pattern, when it comes to architecture, the literature is full of contradictory information. We examined 289 breast cancers and found DCIS in 265 of the cases. The majority of the DCIS cases were seen in the setting of invasive cancer and only 9% of the cases represented pure DCIS with no invasive cancer. The DCIS commonly displayed a mixed pattern with micropapillary, cribriform and solid components with the micropapillary type being the rarest, occurring seldom on its own. A continuum of growth with a micropapillary pattern evolving into a cribriform type could be seen in some of the cases. This may explain some of the conflicting information, in the literature, regarding the different architectural types of DCIS. The comedo-pattern of necrosis could be seen in all types of DCIS. We therefore conclude that the study of the determinants of growth pattern in DCIS would be the key to unravelling the diverse, often non-concordant evidence one encounters in the literature.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/979521
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielscripcaru mammaryductalcarcinomainsituafreshlookatarchitecturalpatterns
AT ibrahimmzardawi mammaryductalcarcinomainsituafreshlookatarchitecturalpatterns
_version_ 1725545650167218176