Le droit de grève et l’Union Européenne en période d'austérité: la proposition "Monti II" et ses cartons jaunes
On March the 21st 2012 the European Commission adopted its proposal for a Regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action within the context of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services. This proposal, also known as "Monti II" was to provide a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association d'Economie Politique
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Interventions Économiques pour une Alternative Sociale |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/interventionseconomiques/2486 |
id |
doaj-1b8be494edab4240afe9ea49cf7131b3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1b8be494edab4240afe9ea49cf7131b32020-11-24T20:42:50ZengAssociation d'Economie PolitiqueInterventions Économiques pour une Alternative Sociale0715-35701710-73772015-03-015210.4000/interventionseconomiques.2486Le droit de grève et l’Union Européenne en période d'austérité: la proposition "Monti II" et ses cartons jaunesMarco RoccaOn March the 21st 2012 the European Commission adopted its proposal for a Regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action within the context of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services. This proposal, also known as "Monti II" was to provide an answer to the concerns raised by the case law of the Court of Justice dealing with the right to take collective action (cases Viking and Laval). However, the proposal was rather short-lived, having being withdrawn by the Commission in September 2012. The present contribution explores the steps which brought to such an outcome. In particular, it analyses the so-called "yellow cards" which were raised against the proposal by several national parliaments in the context of the procedure set up by the Protocol N° 2 on Subsidiarity and Proportionality. Together with the "Monti II" proposal, these "yellow cards" provide interesting insights as regards the present conception of the relationship between the right to take collective action and the EU legal order.http://journals.openedition.org/interventionseconomiques/2486EU Labour LawFundamental Freedoms of the EUProportionalityRight to strikeSubsidiarity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marco Rocca |
spellingShingle |
Marco Rocca Le droit de grève et l’Union Européenne en période d'austérité: la proposition "Monti II" et ses cartons jaunes Interventions Économiques pour une Alternative Sociale EU Labour Law Fundamental Freedoms of the EU Proportionality Right to strike Subsidiarity |
author_facet |
Marco Rocca |
author_sort |
Marco Rocca |
title |
Le droit de grève et l’Union Européenne en période d'austérité: la proposition "Monti II" et ses cartons jaunes |
title_short |
Le droit de grève et l’Union Européenne en période d'austérité: la proposition "Monti II" et ses cartons jaunes |
title_full |
Le droit de grève et l’Union Européenne en période d'austérité: la proposition "Monti II" et ses cartons jaunes |
title_fullStr |
Le droit de grève et l’Union Européenne en période d'austérité: la proposition "Monti II" et ses cartons jaunes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Le droit de grève et l’Union Européenne en période d'austérité: la proposition "Monti II" et ses cartons jaunes |
title_sort |
le droit de grève et l’union européenne en période d'austérité: la proposition "monti ii" et ses cartons jaunes |
publisher |
Association d'Economie Politique |
series |
Interventions Économiques pour une Alternative Sociale |
issn |
0715-3570 1710-7377 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
On March the 21st 2012 the European Commission adopted its proposal for a Regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action within the context of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services. This proposal, also known as "Monti II" was to provide an answer to the concerns raised by the case law of the Court of Justice dealing with the right to take collective action (cases Viking and Laval). However, the proposal was rather short-lived, having being withdrawn by the Commission in September 2012. The present contribution explores the steps which brought to such an outcome. In particular, it analyses the so-called "yellow cards" which were raised against the proposal by several national parliaments in the context of the procedure set up by the Protocol N° 2 on Subsidiarity and Proportionality. Together with the "Monti II" proposal, these "yellow cards" provide interesting insights as regards the present conception of the relationship between the right to take collective action and the EU legal order. |
topic |
EU Labour Law Fundamental Freedoms of the EU Proportionality Right to strike Subsidiarity |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/interventionseconomiques/2486 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcorocca ledroitdegreveetlunioneuropeenneenperiodedausteritelapropositionmontiiietsescartonsjaunes |
_version_ |
1716821533254483968 |