A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives

The growing concerns surrounding the precarious state of the biosphere have triggered organizations to develop and implement innovations that curb environmental degradation (eco-innovation). However, eco-innovation is a risky proposition for organizations and their stakeholders, due to uncertainty o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Russell Tatenda Munodawafa, Satirenjit Kaur Johl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6067
id doaj-1b8642c87a4f40c1957686aaeba91d38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b8642c87a4f40c1957686aaeba91d382020-11-24T21:56:17ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-11-011121606710.3390/su11216067su11216067A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder PerspectivesRussell Tatenda Munodawafa0Satirenjit Kaur Johl1Department of Management and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, MalaysiaDepartment of Management and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, MalaysiaThe growing concerns surrounding the precarious state of the biosphere have triggered organizations to develop and implement innovations that curb environmental degradation (eco-innovation). However, eco-innovation is a risky proposition for organizations and their stakeholders, due to uncertainty of outcome. Despite the high investment risk of eco-innovation, the literature that assesses eco-innovation outcomes from an organizational performance perspective is scant. Thus, this paper uses a systematic approach to review eco-innovation and performance literature. The eco-innovation and performance literature reviewed in this paper is sourced from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) scientific databases. Results from this systematic review suggest that the capital market stakeholder group—an essential stakeholder group—has received little attention in the eco-innovation and performance literature. This is alarming, as this stakeholder group is expected to act in the best interests of the organization—as well as the other stakeholders—especially during strategy formulation and implementation. This paper also finds that the resource-based view and stakeholder theory are frequently utilized in explaining eco-innovation. However, the natural resource-based view is least utilized, despite growing environmental pressures. A multi-theoretical perspective can help to overcome the limitations of one theory, as well as help to unearth additional organizational factors which could potentially catalyze the eco-innovation and performance relationship.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6067eco-innovationcleaner productionstrategyperformancenatural resource-based viewstakeholder theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Russell Tatenda Munodawafa
Satirenjit Kaur Johl
spellingShingle Russell Tatenda Munodawafa
Satirenjit Kaur Johl
A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives
Sustainability
eco-innovation
cleaner production
strategy
performance
natural resource-based view
stakeholder theory
author_facet Russell Tatenda Munodawafa
Satirenjit Kaur Johl
author_sort Russell Tatenda Munodawafa
title A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives
title_short A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives
title_full A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives
title_sort systematic review of eco-innovation and performance from the resource-based and stakeholder perspectives
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-11-01
description The growing concerns surrounding the precarious state of the biosphere have triggered organizations to develop and implement innovations that curb environmental degradation (eco-innovation). However, eco-innovation is a risky proposition for organizations and their stakeholders, due to uncertainty of outcome. Despite the high investment risk of eco-innovation, the literature that assesses eco-innovation outcomes from an organizational performance perspective is scant. Thus, this paper uses a systematic approach to review eco-innovation and performance literature. The eco-innovation and performance literature reviewed in this paper is sourced from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) scientific databases. Results from this systematic review suggest that the capital market stakeholder group—an essential stakeholder group—has received little attention in the eco-innovation and performance literature. This is alarming, as this stakeholder group is expected to act in the best interests of the organization—as well as the other stakeholders—especially during strategy formulation and implementation. This paper also finds that the resource-based view and stakeholder theory are frequently utilized in explaining eco-innovation. However, the natural resource-based view is least utilized, despite growing environmental pressures. A multi-theoretical perspective can help to overcome the limitations of one theory, as well as help to unearth additional organizational factors which could potentially catalyze the eco-innovation and performance relationship.
topic eco-innovation
cleaner production
strategy
performance
natural resource-based view
stakeholder theory
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6067
work_keys_str_mv AT russelltatendamunodawafa asystematicreviewofecoinnovationandperformancefromtheresourcebasedandstakeholderperspectives
AT satirenjitkaurjohl asystematicreviewofecoinnovationandperformancefromtheresourcebasedandstakeholderperspectives
AT russelltatendamunodawafa systematicreviewofecoinnovationandperformancefromtheresourcebasedandstakeholderperspectives
AT satirenjitkaurjohl systematicreviewofecoinnovationandperformancefromtheresourcebasedandstakeholderperspectives
_version_ 1725858718482956288