A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives
The growing concerns surrounding the precarious state of the biosphere have triggered organizations to develop and implement innovations that curb environmental degradation (eco-innovation). However, eco-innovation is a risky proposition for organizations and their stakeholders, due to uncertainty o...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6067 |
id |
doaj-1b8642c87a4f40c1957686aaeba91d38 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1b8642c87a4f40c1957686aaeba91d382020-11-24T21:56:17ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-11-011121606710.3390/su11216067su11216067A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder PerspectivesRussell Tatenda Munodawafa0Satirenjit Kaur Johl1Department of Management and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, MalaysiaDepartment of Management and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, MalaysiaThe growing concerns surrounding the precarious state of the biosphere have triggered organizations to develop and implement innovations that curb environmental degradation (eco-innovation). However, eco-innovation is a risky proposition for organizations and their stakeholders, due to uncertainty of outcome. Despite the high investment risk of eco-innovation, the literature that assesses eco-innovation outcomes from an organizational performance perspective is scant. Thus, this paper uses a systematic approach to review eco-innovation and performance literature. The eco-innovation and performance literature reviewed in this paper is sourced from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) scientific databases. Results from this systematic review suggest that the capital market stakeholder group—an essential stakeholder group—has received little attention in the eco-innovation and performance literature. This is alarming, as this stakeholder group is expected to act in the best interests of the organization—as well as the other stakeholders—especially during strategy formulation and implementation. This paper also finds that the resource-based view and stakeholder theory are frequently utilized in explaining eco-innovation. However, the natural resource-based view is least utilized, despite growing environmental pressures. A multi-theoretical perspective can help to overcome the limitations of one theory, as well as help to unearth additional organizational factors which could potentially catalyze the eco-innovation and performance relationship.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6067eco-innovationcleaner productionstrategyperformancenatural resource-based viewstakeholder theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Russell Tatenda Munodawafa Satirenjit Kaur Johl |
spellingShingle |
Russell Tatenda Munodawafa Satirenjit Kaur Johl A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives Sustainability eco-innovation cleaner production strategy performance natural resource-based view stakeholder theory |
author_facet |
Russell Tatenda Munodawafa Satirenjit Kaur Johl |
author_sort |
Russell Tatenda Munodawafa |
title |
A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives |
title_short |
A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives |
title_full |
A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives |
title_fullStr |
A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives |
title_sort |
systematic review of eco-innovation and performance from the resource-based and stakeholder perspectives |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
The growing concerns surrounding the precarious state of the biosphere have triggered organizations to develop and implement innovations that curb environmental degradation (eco-innovation). However, eco-innovation is a risky proposition for organizations and their stakeholders, due to uncertainty of outcome. Despite the high investment risk of eco-innovation, the literature that assesses eco-innovation outcomes from an organizational performance perspective is scant. Thus, this paper uses a systematic approach to review eco-innovation and performance literature. The eco-innovation and performance literature reviewed in this paper is sourced from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) scientific databases. Results from this systematic review suggest that the capital market stakeholder group—an essential stakeholder group—has received little attention in the eco-innovation and performance literature. This is alarming, as this stakeholder group is expected to act in the best interests of the organization—as well as the other stakeholders—especially during strategy formulation and implementation. This paper also finds that the resource-based view and stakeholder theory are frequently utilized in explaining eco-innovation. However, the natural resource-based view is least utilized, despite growing environmental pressures. A multi-theoretical perspective can help to overcome the limitations of one theory, as well as help to unearth additional organizational factors which could potentially catalyze the eco-innovation and performance relationship. |
topic |
eco-innovation cleaner production strategy performance natural resource-based view stakeholder theory |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6067 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT russelltatendamunodawafa asystematicreviewofecoinnovationandperformancefromtheresourcebasedandstakeholderperspectives AT satirenjitkaurjohl asystematicreviewofecoinnovationandperformancefromtheresourcebasedandstakeholderperspectives AT russelltatendamunodawafa systematicreviewofecoinnovationandperformancefromtheresourcebasedandstakeholderperspectives AT satirenjitkaurjohl systematicreviewofecoinnovationandperformancefromtheresourcebasedandstakeholderperspectives |
_version_ |
1725858718482956288 |