The Type I Versus Type II Agency Conflict on Earnings Management

Tis study aims to detect the background of earnings management behavior in which it shows the tendency of type I or II agency conflict. The high ownership concentration of firms in In-donesia leads type II agency conflict, but the good corporate governance formulation assumes conflict between manage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yavida Nurim, Sunardi Sunardi, Rini Raharti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Semarang 2017-03-01
Series:Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jdm/article/view/10410
id doaj-1b8440a936df4fdb8a933e48416f28ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b8440a936df4fdb8a933e48416f28ec2020-11-25T02:41:27ZengUniversitas Negeri SemarangJurnal Dinamika Manajemen2086-06682337-54342017-03-0181445810.15294/jdm.v8i1.104106223The Type I Versus Type II Agency Conflict on Earnings ManagementYavida Nurim0Sunardi Sunardi1Rini Raharti2Faculty of Economics, Janabadra University, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaFaculty of Economics, Janabadra University, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaFaculty of Economics, Janabadra University, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaTis study aims to detect the background of earnings management behavior in which it shows the tendency of type I or II agency conflict. The high ownership concentration of firms in In-donesia leads type II agency conflict, but the good corporate governance formulation assumes conflict between management and shareholders. This study uses published data in IDX from 20092014. TThe result reveals that reputation quality has negative significant correlation to earnings management behaviors, but corporate governance quality has insignificant correlation to earnings management, except percentage of independent commissioner board in moder-ate level. It has implication that management faces type II agency conflict. The majority may monitor management directly, so the finding reveals that independent commissioner boards function is not optimum as part of corporate governance mechanism. According to the evi-dence, corporate governance formulation, especially in Indonesia, should be needed for reduc-ing earnings management on type II tendency.https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jdm/article/view/10410orporate governanceearnings managementownership concen-trationreputation qualitytype i and ii agency conflict.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yavida Nurim
Sunardi Sunardi
Rini Raharti
spellingShingle Yavida Nurim
Sunardi Sunardi
Rini Raharti
The Type I Versus Type II Agency Conflict on Earnings Management
Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen
orporate governance
earnings management
ownership concen-tration
reputation quality
type i and ii agency conflict.
author_facet Yavida Nurim
Sunardi Sunardi
Rini Raharti
author_sort Yavida Nurim
title The Type I Versus Type II Agency Conflict on Earnings Management
title_short The Type I Versus Type II Agency Conflict on Earnings Management
title_full The Type I Versus Type II Agency Conflict on Earnings Management
title_fullStr The Type I Versus Type II Agency Conflict on Earnings Management
title_full_unstemmed The Type I Versus Type II Agency Conflict on Earnings Management
title_sort type i versus type ii agency conflict on earnings management
publisher Universitas Negeri Semarang
series Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen
issn 2086-0668
2337-5434
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Tis study aims to detect the background of earnings management behavior in which it shows the tendency of type I or II agency conflict. The high ownership concentration of firms in In-donesia leads type II agency conflict, but the good corporate governance formulation assumes conflict between management and shareholders. This study uses published data in IDX from 20092014. TThe result reveals that reputation quality has negative significant correlation to earnings management behaviors, but corporate governance quality has insignificant correlation to earnings management, except percentage of independent commissioner board in moder-ate level. It has implication that management faces type II agency conflict. The majority may monitor management directly, so the finding reveals that independent commissioner boards function is not optimum as part of corporate governance mechanism. According to the evi-dence, corporate governance formulation, especially in Indonesia, should be needed for reduc-ing earnings management on type II tendency.
topic orporate governance
earnings management
ownership concen-tration
reputation quality
type i and ii agency conflict.
url https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jdm/article/view/10410
work_keys_str_mv AT yavidanurim thetypeiversustypeiiagencyconflictonearningsmanagement
AT sunardisunardi thetypeiversustypeiiagencyconflictonearningsmanagement
AT riniraharti thetypeiversustypeiiagencyconflictonearningsmanagement
AT yavidanurim typeiversustypeiiagencyconflictonearningsmanagement
AT sunardisunardi typeiversustypeiiagencyconflictonearningsmanagement
AT riniraharti typeiversustypeiiagencyconflictonearningsmanagement
_version_ 1724778369958019072