Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers
Containment, safe handling and disinfection of human excreta in cholera treatment centers (CTC) are key to preventing the onward spread of the disease. This study compared the efficacy of three chlorine-based approaches at concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, and 2% and one hydrated lime-based (Ca(OH)<sub...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Water |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/188 |
id |
doaj-1b6e17a065c54a9099cadd93f6245fdd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1b6e17a065c54a9099cadd93f6245fdd2020-11-24T21:16:59ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412019-01-0111218810.3390/w11020188w11020188Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment CentersDiogo Trajano Gomes da Silva0Kevin Ives1Jean-Francois Fesselet2James Ebdon3Huw Taylor4Environment and Public Health Research and Enterprise Group, School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UKEnvironment and Public Health Research and Enterprise Group, School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UKMédecins Sans Frontières MSF-OCA, Naritaweg 10, 1043 BX, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsEnvironment and Public Health Research and Enterprise Group, School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UKEnvironment and Public Health Research and Enterprise Group, School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UKContainment, safe handling and disinfection of human excreta in cholera treatment centers (CTC) are key to preventing the onward spread of the disease. This study compared the efficacy of three chlorine-based approaches at concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, and 2% and one hydrated lime-based (Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> at 30% w:v) approach. Experiments followed existing Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) cholera guidelines. Three simulated human excreta matrices consisting of either raw municipal wastewater (4.5 liters), or raw municipal wastewater plus 1%, or 20% faecal sludge (w:v), were treated in 14 liter Oxfam<sup>®</sup> buckets containing 125 mL of chlorine solution or hydrated lime suspension. Bacterial indicators (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral indicator (somatic coliphages (SOMPH)) were used to determine treatment efficacy following contact times of 10, 30 and 60min. Results showed that efficacy improved as chlorine concentrations increased. No statistical differences were observed with respect to the various contact times. Overall median log removal for 0.5% chlorine were: FC (1.66), IE (1.41); SOMPH (1.28); for 1% chlorine: FC (1.98), IE (1.82); SOMPH (1.79); and for 2% chlorine: FC (2.88), IE (2.60), SOMPH (2.38). Hydrated lime (30%) provided the greatest overall log removal for bacterial indicators (FC (3.93) and IE (3.50), but not for the viral indicator, SOMPH (1.67)). These findings suggest that the use of 30% hydrated lime suspensions or 2% chlorine solutions may offer a simple public health protection measure for the containment, safe handling, and disinfection of human excreta during humanitarian emergencies.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/188sanitationwastewaterfaecal sludgeexcretapathogensdisinfectionchlorinehydrated limeWASH |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva Kevin Ives Jean-Francois Fesselet James Ebdon Huw Taylor |
spellingShingle |
Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva Kevin Ives Jean-Francois Fesselet James Ebdon Huw Taylor Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers Water sanitation wastewater faecal sludge excreta pathogens disinfection chlorine hydrated lime WASH |
author_facet |
Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva Kevin Ives Jean-Francois Fesselet James Ebdon Huw Taylor |
author_sort |
Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva |
title |
Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers |
title_short |
Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers |
title_full |
Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers |
title_sort |
assessment of recommendation for the containment and disinfection of human excreta in cholera treatment centers |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Water |
issn |
2073-4441 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Containment, safe handling and disinfection of human excreta in cholera treatment centers (CTC) are key to preventing the onward spread of the disease. This study compared the efficacy of three chlorine-based approaches at concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, and 2% and one hydrated lime-based (Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> at 30% w:v) approach. Experiments followed existing Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) cholera guidelines. Three simulated human excreta matrices consisting of either raw municipal wastewater (4.5 liters), or raw municipal wastewater plus 1%, or 20% faecal sludge (w:v), were treated in 14 liter Oxfam<sup>®</sup> buckets containing 125 mL of chlorine solution or hydrated lime suspension. Bacterial indicators (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral indicator (somatic coliphages (SOMPH)) were used to determine treatment efficacy following contact times of 10, 30 and 60min. Results showed that efficacy improved as chlorine concentrations increased. No statistical differences were observed with respect to the various contact times. Overall median log removal for 0.5% chlorine were: FC (1.66), IE (1.41); SOMPH (1.28); for 1% chlorine: FC (1.98), IE (1.82); SOMPH (1.79); and for 2% chlorine: FC (2.88), IE (2.60), SOMPH (2.38). Hydrated lime (30%) provided the greatest overall log removal for bacterial indicators (FC (3.93) and IE (3.50), but not for the viral indicator, SOMPH (1.67)). These findings suggest that the use of 30% hydrated lime suspensions or 2% chlorine solutions may offer a simple public health protection measure for the containment, safe handling, and disinfection of human excreta during humanitarian emergencies. |
topic |
sanitation wastewater faecal sludge excreta pathogens disinfection chlorine hydrated lime WASH |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/188 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT diogotrajanogomesdasilva assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters AT kevinives assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters AT jeanfrancoisfesselet assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters AT jamesebdon assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters AT huwtaylor assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters |
_version_ |
1726014939684929536 |