Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers

Containment, safe handling and disinfection of human excreta in cholera treatment centers (CTC) are key to preventing the onward spread of the disease. This study compared the efficacy of three chlorine-based approaches at concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, and 2% and one hydrated lime-based (Ca(OH)<sub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva, Kevin Ives, Jean-Francois Fesselet, James Ebdon, Huw Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/188
id doaj-1b6e17a065c54a9099cadd93f6245fdd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b6e17a065c54a9099cadd93f6245fdd2020-11-24T21:16:59ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412019-01-0111218810.3390/w11020188w11020188Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment CentersDiogo Trajano Gomes da Silva0Kevin Ives1Jean-Francois Fesselet2James Ebdon3Huw Taylor4Environment and Public Health Research and Enterprise Group, School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UKEnvironment and Public Health Research and Enterprise Group, School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UKMédecins Sans Frontières MSF-OCA, Naritaweg 10, 1043 BX, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsEnvironment and Public Health Research and Enterprise Group, School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UKEnvironment and Public Health Research and Enterprise Group, School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Cockcroft Building, Lewes Rd, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UKContainment, safe handling and disinfection of human excreta in cholera treatment centers (CTC) are key to preventing the onward spread of the disease. This study compared the efficacy of three chlorine-based approaches at concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, and 2% and one hydrated lime-based (Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> at 30% w:v) approach. Experiments followed existing M&#233;decins Sans Fronti&#232;res (MSF) cholera guidelines. Three simulated human excreta matrices consisting of either raw municipal wastewater (4.5 liters), or raw municipal wastewater plus 1%, or 20% faecal sludge (w:v), were treated in 14 liter Oxfam<sup>&#174;</sup> buckets containing 125 mL of chlorine solution or hydrated lime suspension. Bacterial indicators (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral indicator (somatic coliphages (SOMPH)) were used to determine treatment efficacy following contact times of 10, 30 and 60min. Results showed that efficacy improved as chlorine concentrations increased. No statistical differences were observed with respect to the various contact times. Overall median log removal for 0.5% chlorine were: FC (1.66), IE (1.41); SOMPH (1.28); for 1% chlorine: FC (1.98), IE (1.82); SOMPH (1.79); and for 2% chlorine: FC (2.88), IE (2.60), SOMPH (2.38). Hydrated lime (30%) provided the greatest overall log removal for bacterial indicators (FC (3.93) and IE (3.50), but not for the viral indicator, SOMPH (1.67)). These findings suggest that the use of 30% hydrated lime suspensions or 2% chlorine solutions may offer a simple public health protection measure for the containment, safe handling, and disinfection of human excreta during humanitarian emergencies.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/188sanitationwastewaterfaecal sludgeexcretapathogensdisinfectionchlorinehydrated limeWASH
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva
Kevin Ives
Jean-Francois Fesselet
James Ebdon
Huw Taylor
spellingShingle Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva
Kevin Ives
Jean-Francois Fesselet
James Ebdon
Huw Taylor
Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers
Water
sanitation
wastewater
faecal sludge
excreta
pathogens
disinfection
chlorine
hydrated lime
WASH
author_facet Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva
Kevin Ives
Jean-Francois Fesselet
James Ebdon
Huw Taylor
author_sort Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva
title Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers
title_short Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers
title_full Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers
title_fullStr Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Recommendation for the Containment and Disinfection of Human Excreta in Cholera Treatment Centers
title_sort assessment of recommendation for the containment and disinfection of human excreta in cholera treatment centers
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Containment, safe handling and disinfection of human excreta in cholera treatment centers (CTC) are key to preventing the onward spread of the disease. This study compared the efficacy of three chlorine-based approaches at concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, and 2% and one hydrated lime-based (Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> at 30% w:v) approach. Experiments followed existing M&#233;decins Sans Fronti&#232;res (MSF) cholera guidelines. Three simulated human excreta matrices consisting of either raw municipal wastewater (4.5 liters), or raw municipal wastewater plus 1%, or 20% faecal sludge (w:v), were treated in 14 liter Oxfam<sup>&#174;</sup> buckets containing 125 mL of chlorine solution or hydrated lime suspension. Bacterial indicators (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral indicator (somatic coliphages (SOMPH)) were used to determine treatment efficacy following contact times of 10, 30 and 60min. Results showed that efficacy improved as chlorine concentrations increased. No statistical differences were observed with respect to the various contact times. Overall median log removal for 0.5% chlorine were: FC (1.66), IE (1.41); SOMPH (1.28); for 1% chlorine: FC (1.98), IE (1.82); SOMPH (1.79); and for 2% chlorine: FC (2.88), IE (2.60), SOMPH (2.38). Hydrated lime (30%) provided the greatest overall log removal for bacterial indicators (FC (3.93) and IE (3.50), but not for the viral indicator, SOMPH (1.67)). These findings suggest that the use of 30% hydrated lime suspensions or 2% chlorine solutions may offer a simple public health protection measure for the containment, safe handling, and disinfection of human excreta during humanitarian emergencies.
topic sanitation
wastewater
faecal sludge
excreta
pathogens
disinfection
chlorine
hydrated lime
WASH
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/2/188
work_keys_str_mv AT diogotrajanogomesdasilva assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters
AT kevinives assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters
AT jeanfrancoisfesselet assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters
AT jamesebdon assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters
AT huwtaylor assessmentofrecommendationforthecontainmentanddisinfectionofhumanexcretaincholeratreatmentcenters
_version_ 1726014939684929536