Effective investigative interviewing: Turning interrogations into conversations

An interrogation is essentially combative and high pressure, and therefore most often a negatively charged monologue of an interrogator trying to work a confession out of a subject. In the following, there should be removed from any ethical, effective investigative interviewing practice: interrogati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grossman Stephen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade 2017-01-01
Series:NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2017/0354-88721701141G.pdf
id doaj-1b636d4ec5704193b9cd196662dd9139
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b636d4ec5704193b9cd196662dd91392021-09-02T11:20:23ZengUniversity of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, BelgradeNBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija0354-88722620-04062017-01-012211411550354-88721701141GEffective investigative interviewing: Turning interrogations into conversationsGrossman Stephen0Sykes & Burrows, London, United KingdomAn interrogation is essentially combative and high pressure, and therefore most often a negatively charged monologue of an interrogator trying to work a confession out of a subject. In the following, there should be removed from any ethical, effective investigative interviewing practice: interrogation, combative, pressure, monologue and confession. Effective, ethical investigative interviews should be conversational, non-combative and should not seek confessions as a primary objective. Pressuring subjects (including suspects, witnesses or victims) forces people to lie, go silent or to become uncooperative. Pressure and accusations trigger defensive responses. They also cause panic and fear which impacts a person’s cognitive ability to remember and even to communicate. How often people in shock are left stuttering or unable to form coherent sentences or to remember a question asked seconds earlier? Combine the intimidation of being questioned by police, the fear of going to jail and the humiliation of being judged badly by people in authority or by one’s family and friends, as well as fear of reprisals for informing on other criminals, and one easily ends up with “no comment” interviews or flat out lies. Forcing subjects to admit a version of events in order to overcome “no comment” responses or flat out lies leads to poor conviction rates and wrongful convictions. The alternative, which has proven highly effective when practiced within a well-defined, controlled process, is a managed conversation that relaxes a subject and provides an environment and communication framework that inspires an exchange.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2017/0354-88721701141G.pdfinvestigationinterviewprofilinginterrogationnegotiation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Grossman Stephen
spellingShingle Grossman Stephen
Effective investigative interviewing: Turning interrogations into conversations
NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
investigation
interview
profiling
interrogation
negotiation
author_facet Grossman Stephen
author_sort Grossman Stephen
title Effective investigative interviewing: Turning interrogations into conversations
title_short Effective investigative interviewing: Turning interrogations into conversations
title_full Effective investigative interviewing: Turning interrogations into conversations
title_fullStr Effective investigative interviewing: Turning interrogations into conversations
title_full_unstemmed Effective investigative interviewing: Turning interrogations into conversations
title_sort effective investigative interviewing: turning interrogations into conversations
publisher University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade
series NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
issn 0354-8872
2620-0406
publishDate 2017-01-01
description An interrogation is essentially combative and high pressure, and therefore most often a negatively charged monologue of an interrogator trying to work a confession out of a subject. In the following, there should be removed from any ethical, effective investigative interviewing practice: interrogation, combative, pressure, monologue and confession. Effective, ethical investigative interviews should be conversational, non-combative and should not seek confessions as a primary objective. Pressuring subjects (including suspects, witnesses or victims) forces people to lie, go silent or to become uncooperative. Pressure and accusations trigger defensive responses. They also cause panic and fear which impacts a person’s cognitive ability to remember and even to communicate. How often people in shock are left stuttering or unable to form coherent sentences or to remember a question asked seconds earlier? Combine the intimidation of being questioned by police, the fear of going to jail and the humiliation of being judged badly by people in authority or by one’s family and friends, as well as fear of reprisals for informing on other criminals, and one easily ends up with “no comment” interviews or flat out lies. Forcing subjects to admit a version of events in order to overcome “no comment” responses or flat out lies leads to poor conviction rates and wrongful convictions. The alternative, which has proven highly effective when practiced within a well-defined, controlled process, is a managed conversation that relaxes a subject and provides an environment and communication framework that inspires an exchange.
topic investigation
interview
profiling
interrogation
negotiation
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2017/0354-88721701141G.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT grossmanstephen effectiveinvestigativeinterviewingturninginterrogationsintoconversations
_version_ 1721176060098248704