Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part I: Comparison with the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test

<p>Abstract</p> <p>As part of a larger literature study on transgenic animals in mutagenicity testing, test results from the transgenic mutagenicity assays (<it>lacI </it>model; commercially available as the Big Blue<sup>® </sup>mouse, and the <it>lacZ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wahnschaffe U, Bitsch A, Kielhorn J, Mangelsdorf I
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Journal of Carcinogenesis
Online Access:http://www.carcinogenesis.com/content/4/1/3
id doaj-1b6059e416594e10af2bfb9d541b3d4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b6059e416594e10af2bfb9d541b3d4f2020-11-24T20:54:00ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Carcinogenesis0974-67731477-31632005-01-0141310.1186/1477-3163-4-3Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part I: Comparison with the mouse bone marrow micronucleus testWahnschaffe UBitsch AKielhorn JMangelsdorf I<p>Abstract</p> <p>As part of a larger literature study on transgenic animals in mutagenicity testing, test results from the transgenic mutagenicity assays (<it>lacI </it>model; commercially available as the Big Blue<sup>® </sup>mouse, and the <it>lacZ </it>model; commercially available as the Muta™Mouse), were compared with the results on the same substances in the more traditional mouse bone marrow micronucleus test. 39 substances were found which had been tested in the micronucleus assay and in the above transgenic mouse systems. Although, the transgenic animal mutation assay is not directly comparable with the micronucleus test, because different genetic endpoints are examined: chromosome aberration versus gene mutation, the results for the majority of substances were in agreement. Both test systems, the transgenic mouse assay and the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test, have advantages and they complement each other. However, the transgenic animal assay has some distinct advantages over the micronucleus test: it is not restricted to one target organ and detects systemic as well as local mutagenic effects.</p> http://www.carcinogenesis.com/content/4/1/3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wahnschaffe U
Bitsch A
Kielhorn J
Mangelsdorf I
spellingShingle Wahnschaffe U
Bitsch A
Kielhorn J
Mangelsdorf I
Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part I: Comparison with the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test
Journal of Carcinogenesis
author_facet Wahnschaffe U
Bitsch A
Kielhorn J
Mangelsdorf I
author_sort Wahnschaffe U
title Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part I: Comparison with the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test
title_short Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part I: Comparison with the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test
title_full Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part I: Comparison with the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test
title_fullStr Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part I: Comparison with the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test
title_full_unstemmed Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part I: Comparison with the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test
title_sort mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. part i: comparison with the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Carcinogenesis
issn 0974-6773
1477-3163
publishDate 2005-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>As part of a larger literature study on transgenic animals in mutagenicity testing, test results from the transgenic mutagenicity assays (<it>lacI </it>model; commercially available as the Big Blue<sup>® </sup>mouse, and the <it>lacZ </it>model; commercially available as the Muta™Mouse), were compared with the results on the same substances in the more traditional mouse bone marrow micronucleus test. 39 substances were found which had been tested in the micronucleus assay and in the above transgenic mouse systems. Although, the transgenic animal mutation assay is not directly comparable with the micronucleus test, because different genetic endpoints are examined: chromosome aberration versus gene mutation, the results for the majority of substances were in agreement. Both test systems, the transgenic mouse assay and the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test, have advantages and they complement each other. However, the transgenic animal assay has some distinct advantages over the micronucleus test: it is not restricted to one target organ and detects systemic as well as local mutagenic effects.</p>
url http://www.carcinogenesis.com/content/4/1/3
work_keys_str_mv AT wahnschaffeu mutagenicitytestingwithtransgenicmiceparticomparisonwiththemousebonemarrowmicronucleustest
AT bitscha mutagenicitytestingwithtransgenicmiceparticomparisonwiththemousebonemarrowmicronucleustest
AT kielhornj mutagenicitytestingwithtransgenicmiceparticomparisonwiththemousebonemarrowmicronucleustest
AT mangelsdorfi mutagenicitytestingwithtransgenicmiceparticomparisonwiththemousebonemarrowmicronucleustest
_version_ 1716795408369319936