The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University

<p>The article discusses how educational organizations are chosen based on trust and how educational relationships stabilize after that choice is made. In order answer to these questions, we propose a conceptual model that contains two time perspectives — before admission and after admission t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David L. Konstantinovskiy, Igor S. Kuznetsov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2020-06-01
Series:Социологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/7266/submission/proof/7266-61-13305-1-10-20200628.pdf
id doaj-1b5e7ebbfb8d468d8886b07c0fc40cbc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b5e7ebbfb8d468d8886b07c0fc40cbc2020-11-25T03:00:22ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952020-06-012628210110.19181/socjour.2020.26.2.72667266The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of UniversityDavid L. Konstantinovskiy0Igor S. Kuznetsov1Russian FederationRussian Federation<p>The article discusses how educational organizations are chosen based on trust and how educational relationships stabilize after that choice is made. In order answer to these questions, we propose a conceptual model that contains two time perspectives — before admission and after admission to an educational organization. These temporal perspectives imply different languages for description: the first is described using the language of confidence, the second — using the language of consent. Moreover, the basis for distinguishing trust consists to a certain degree of a combination of knowledge and ignorance when it comes to the object of trust, while the basis for distinguishing consent is the presence or absence of disappointment in the education being received. The study’s main theoretical resources are G. Simmel’s intuitions about the nature of trust and L. Boltanski and L. Theveno on the nature of consent. The conceptual model includes the assumption that the types of trust formed at the very beginning, before entering the educational organization, determine how stable educational relationships subsequently prove to be. The article discusses the features and limitations of such a conceptual model, and displays an empirical mapping of distinction systems.</p>http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/7266/submission/proof/7266-61-13305-1-10-20200628.pdftrustconsentchoice of educational organizationhigher education
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David L. Konstantinovskiy
Igor S. Kuznetsov
spellingShingle David L. Konstantinovskiy
Igor S. Kuznetsov
The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University
Социологический журнал
trust
consent
choice of educational organization
higher education
author_facet David L. Konstantinovskiy
Igor S. Kuznetsov
author_sort David L. Konstantinovskiy
title The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University
title_short The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University
title_full The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University
title_fullStr The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University
title_full_unstemmed The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University
title_sort category of trust in studying oneвђ™s choice of university
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
series Социологический журнал
issn 1562-2495
publishDate 2020-06-01
description <p>The article discusses how educational organizations are chosen based on trust and how educational relationships stabilize after that choice is made. In order answer to these questions, we propose a conceptual model that contains two time perspectives — before admission and after admission to an educational organization. These temporal perspectives imply different languages for description: the first is described using the language of confidence, the second — using the language of consent. Moreover, the basis for distinguishing trust consists to a certain degree of a combination of knowledge and ignorance when it comes to the object of trust, while the basis for distinguishing consent is the presence or absence of disappointment in the education being received. The study’s main theoretical resources are G. Simmel’s intuitions about the nature of trust and L. Boltanski and L. Theveno on the nature of consent. The conceptual model includes the assumption that the types of trust formed at the very beginning, before entering the educational organization, determine how stable educational relationships subsequently prove to be. The article discusses the features and limitations of such a conceptual model, and displays an empirical mapping of distinction systems.</p>
topic trust
consent
choice of educational organization
higher education
url http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/7266/submission/proof/7266-61-13305-1-10-20200628.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT davidlkonstantinovskiy thecategoryoftrustinstudyingonevđschoiceofuniversity
AT igorskuznetsov thecategoryoftrustinstudyingonevđschoiceofuniversity
AT davidlkonstantinovskiy categoryoftrustinstudyingonevđschoiceofuniversity
AT igorskuznetsov categoryoftrustinstudyingonevđschoiceofuniversity
_version_ 1724698583775576064