The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University
<p>The article discusses how educational organizations are chosen based on trust and how educational relationships stabilize after that choice is made. In order answer to these questions, we propose a conceptual model that contains two time perspectives — before admission and after admission t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Социологический журнал |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/7266/submission/proof/7266-61-13305-1-10-20200628.pdf |
id |
doaj-1b5e7ebbfb8d468d8886b07c0fc40cbc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1b5e7ebbfb8d468d8886b07c0fc40cbc2020-11-25T03:00:22ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологический журнал1562-24952020-06-012628210110.19181/socjour.2020.26.2.72667266The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of UniversityDavid L. Konstantinovskiy0Igor S. Kuznetsov1Russian FederationRussian Federation<p>The article discusses how educational organizations are chosen based on trust and how educational relationships stabilize after that choice is made. In order answer to these questions, we propose a conceptual model that contains two time perspectives — before admission and after admission to an educational organization. These temporal perspectives imply different languages for description: the first is described using the language of confidence, the second — using the language of consent. Moreover, the basis for distinguishing trust consists to a certain degree of a combination of knowledge and ignorance when it comes to the object of trust, while the basis for distinguishing consent is the presence or absence of disappointment in the education being received. The study’s main theoretical resources are G. Simmel’s intuitions about the nature of trust and L. Boltanski and L. Theveno on the nature of consent. The conceptual model includes the assumption that the types of trust formed at the very beginning, before entering the educational organization, determine how stable educational relationships subsequently prove to be. The article discusses the features and limitations of such a conceptual model, and displays an empirical mapping of distinction systems.</p>http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/7266/submission/proof/7266-61-13305-1-10-20200628.pdftrustconsentchoice of educational organizationhigher education |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David L. Konstantinovskiy Igor S. Kuznetsov |
spellingShingle |
David L. Konstantinovskiy Igor S. Kuznetsov The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University Социологический журнал trust consent choice of educational organization higher education |
author_facet |
David L. Konstantinovskiy Igor S. Kuznetsov |
author_sort |
David L. Konstantinovskiy |
title |
The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University |
title_short |
The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University |
title_full |
The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University |
title_fullStr |
The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Category of Trust in Studying One’s Choice of University |
title_sort |
category of trust in studying oneвђ™s choice of university |
publisher |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology |
series |
Социологический журнал |
issn |
1562-2495 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
<p>The article discusses how educational organizations are chosen based on trust and how educational relationships stabilize after that choice is made. In order answer to these questions, we propose a conceptual model that contains two time perspectives — before admission and after admission to an educational organization. These temporal perspectives imply different languages for description: the first is described using the language of confidence, the second — using the language of consent. Moreover, the basis for distinguishing trust consists to a certain degree of a combination of knowledge and ignorance when it comes to the object of trust, while the basis for distinguishing consent is the presence or absence of disappointment in the education being received. The study’s main theoretical resources are G. Simmel’s intuitions about the nature of trust and L. Boltanski and L. Theveno on the nature of consent. The conceptual model includes the assumption that the types of trust formed at the very beginning, before entering the educational organization, determine how stable educational relationships subsequently prove to be. The article discusses the features and limitations of such a conceptual model, and displays an empirical mapping of distinction systems.</p> |
topic |
trust consent choice of educational organization higher education |
url |
http://jour.fnisc.ru/upload/journals/1/articles/7266/submission/proof/7266-61-13305-1-10-20200628.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidlkonstantinovskiy thecategoryoftrustinstudyingonevđschoiceofuniversity AT igorskuznetsov thecategoryoftrustinstudyingonevđschoiceofuniversity AT davidlkonstantinovskiy categoryoftrustinstudyingonevđschoiceofuniversity AT igorskuznetsov categoryoftrustinstudyingonevđschoiceofuniversity |
_version_ |
1724698583775576064 |