Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes

Abstract Recent findings suggest that attentional and oculomotor control is heavily affected by past experience, giving rise to selection and suppression history effects, so that target selection is facilitated if they appear at frequently attended locations, and distractor filtering is facilitated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valeria Di Caro, Chiara Della Libera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93335-0
id doaj-1b5dc24073684369a283ae51db22bad4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b5dc24073684369a283ae51db22bad42021-07-04T11:30:29ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-07-0111111410.1038/s41598-021-93335-0Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframesValeria Di Caro0Chiara Della Libera1Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of VeronaDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of VeronaAbstract Recent findings suggest that attentional and oculomotor control is heavily affected by past experience, giving rise to selection and suppression history effects, so that target selection is facilitated if they appear at frequently attended locations, and distractor filtering is facilitated at frequently ignored locations. While selection history effects once instantiated seem to be long-lasting, whether suppression history is similarly durable is still debated. We assessed the permanence of these effects in a unique experimental setting investigating eye-movements, where the locations associated with statistical unbalances were exclusively linked with either target selection or distractor suppression. Experiment 1 and 2 explored the survival of suppression history in the long and in the short term, respectively, revealing that its lingering traces are relatively short lived. Experiment 3 showed that in the very same experimental context, selection history effects were long lasting. These results seem to suggest that different mechanisms support the learning-induced plasticity triggered by selection and suppression history. Specifically, while selection history may depend on lasting changes within stored representations of the visual space, suppression history effects hinge instead on a functional plasticity which is transient in nature, and involves spatial representations which are constantly updated and adaptively sustain ongoing oculomotor control.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93335-0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valeria Di Caro
Chiara Della Libera
spellingShingle Valeria Di Caro
Chiara Della Libera
Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
Scientific Reports
author_facet Valeria Di Caro
Chiara Della Libera
author_sort Valeria Di Caro
title Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_short Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_full Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_fullStr Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_full_unstemmed Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
title_sort statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Recent findings suggest that attentional and oculomotor control is heavily affected by past experience, giving rise to selection and suppression history effects, so that target selection is facilitated if they appear at frequently attended locations, and distractor filtering is facilitated at frequently ignored locations. While selection history effects once instantiated seem to be long-lasting, whether suppression history is similarly durable is still debated. We assessed the permanence of these effects in a unique experimental setting investigating eye-movements, where the locations associated with statistical unbalances were exclusively linked with either target selection or distractor suppression. Experiment 1 and 2 explored the survival of suppression history in the long and in the short term, respectively, revealing that its lingering traces are relatively short lived. Experiment 3 showed that in the very same experimental context, selection history effects were long lasting. These results seem to suggest that different mechanisms support the learning-induced plasticity triggered by selection and suppression history. Specifically, while selection history may depend on lasting changes within stored representations of the visual space, suppression history effects hinge instead on a functional plasticity which is transient in nature, and involves spatial representations which are constantly updated and adaptively sustain ongoing oculomotor control.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93335-0
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriadicaro statisticallearningoftargetselectionanddistractorsuppressionshapeattentionalpriorityaccordingtodifferenttimeframes
AT chiaradellalibera statisticallearningoftargetselectionanddistractorsuppressionshapeattentionalpriorityaccordingtodifferenttimeframes
_version_ 1721320162866495488