Public Hearings as Social Performance: Addressing the Courts, Restoring Citizenship

Since the late 1990s, major claims addressed to the Indian state by, or on behalf of, the underprivileged, have been formulated in terms of rights (right to work, to food, etc.). Collective action increasingly addresses the courts as much as governments or legislative assemblies. This paper aims to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stéphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du Sud 2017-09-01
Series:South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
Subjects:
PIL
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/4413
id doaj-1b56eff09cfe4a76ae6323b5cea22863
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b56eff09cfe4a76ae6323b5cea228632021-02-09T13:07:26ZengCentre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du SudSouth Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal1960-60602017-09-011710.4000/samaj.4413Public Hearings as Social Performance: Addressing the Courts, Restoring CitizenshipStéphanie Tawa Lama-RewalSince the late 1990s, major claims addressed to the Indian state by, or on behalf of, the underprivileged, have been formulated in terms of rights (right to work, to food, etc.). Collective action increasingly addresses the courts as much as governments or legislative assemblies. This paper aims to show, through an analysis of public hearings (jan sunwai in Hindi), that such “legalism” of Indian progressive social movements is at work not only in the language, but also in the form of mobilizations. In order to interpret public hearings as social performance, I compare them with two modes of judiciary intervention that depart from the ordinary—the PIL in India, Truth commissions in other countries—and thereby highlight a series of affinities, both substantive and procedural, between the three dispositives. This interpretive analysis points at the deep originality of public hearings as a form of collective action, and at their political significance insofar as they can, in the best of cases, restore citizenship.http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/4413PILjudicial activismRight to Informationsocial performancepublic hearingrestorative justice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stéphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal
spellingShingle Stéphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal
Public Hearings as Social Performance: Addressing the Courts, Restoring Citizenship
South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
PIL
judicial activism
Right to Information
social performance
public hearing
restorative justice
author_facet Stéphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal
author_sort Stéphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal
title Public Hearings as Social Performance: Addressing the Courts, Restoring Citizenship
title_short Public Hearings as Social Performance: Addressing the Courts, Restoring Citizenship
title_full Public Hearings as Social Performance: Addressing the Courts, Restoring Citizenship
title_fullStr Public Hearings as Social Performance: Addressing the Courts, Restoring Citizenship
title_full_unstemmed Public Hearings as Social Performance: Addressing the Courts, Restoring Citizenship
title_sort public hearings as social performance: addressing the courts, restoring citizenship
publisher Centre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du Sud
series South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
issn 1960-6060
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Since the late 1990s, major claims addressed to the Indian state by, or on behalf of, the underprivileged, have been formulated in terms of rights (right to work, to food, etc.). Collective action increasingly addresses the courts as much as governments or legislative assemblies. This paper aims to show, through an analysis of public hearings (jan sunwai in Hindi), that such “legalism” of Indian progressive social movements is at work not only in the language, but also in the form of mobilizations. In order to interpret public hearings as social performance, I compare them with two modes of judiciary intervention that depart from the ordinary—the PIL in India, Truth commissions in other countries—and thereby highlight a series of affinities, both substantive and procedural, between the three dispositives. This interpretive analysis points at the deep originality of public hearings as a form of collective action, and at their political significance insofar as they can, in the best of cases, restore citizenship.
topic PIL
judicial activism
Right to Information
social performance
public hearing
restorative justice
url http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/4413
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanietawalamarewal publichearingsassocialperformanceaddressingthecourtsrestoringcitizenship
_version_ 1724276985355567104