Transversing Formalisms
In the editorial introduction of this issue of Footprint, the question of architectural form is approached from a population of minor perspectives. Inspired by Bateson’s metalogues, the authors wish to bring forward multiple questions on architectural form instead of a single generalizing one: from...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Jap Sam Books
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Footprint |
Online Access: | https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/1969 |
id |
doaj-1b37f0ef6b3f48a1ba6ff3072e982f4b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1b37f0ef6b3f48a1ba6ff3072e982f4b2021-02-08T12:05:59ZengJap Sam BooksFootprint1875-15041875-14902018-04-0112110.7480/footprint.12.1.19691969Transversing FormalismsStavros Kousoulas0Jorge Mejía Hernández1Delft University of TechnologyDelft University of Technology In the editorial introduction of this issue of Footprint, the question of architectural form is approached from a population of minor perspectives. Inspired by Bateson’s metalogues, the authors wish to bring forward multiple questions on architectural form instead of a single generalizing one: from ‘what is form’ to ‘how, when, where and why is form’. In this respect, they examine the ways for a possible reconciliation between the genetic and the generic, between the discursive outlines of various formalisms, opting for an approach that is both syncretic and transversal. Committed to architectural form, they conclude by claiming that it stands for much more than simply a concept. Form, in its ambiguity and heterogeneity, stands for a shared problem, one that brings together disciplines, schools of thought and variant methodological practices, turning therefore the discursive constraints of the past in productive chances for the future. https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/1969 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stavros Kousoulas Jorge Mejía Hernández |
spellingShingle |
Stavros Kousoulas Jorge Mejía Hernández Transversing Formalisms Footprint |
author_facet |
Stavros Kousoulas Jorge Mejía Hernández |
author_sort |
Stavros Kousoulas |
title |
Transversing Formalisms |
title_short |
Transversing Formalisms |
title_full |
Transversing Formalisms |
title_fullStr |
Transversing Formalisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Transversing Formalisms |
title_sort |
transversing formalisms |
publisher |
Jap Sam Books |
series |
Footprint |
issn |
1875-1504 1875-1490 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
In the editorial introduction of this issue of Footprint, the question of architectural form is approached from a population of minor perspectives. Inspired by Bateson’s metalogues, the authors wish to bring forward multiple questions on architectural form instead of a single generalizing one: from ‘what is form’ to ‘how, when, where and why is form’. In this respect, they examine the ways for a possible reconciliation between the genetic and the generic, between the discursive outlines of various formalisms, opting for an approach that is both syncretic and transversal. Committed to architectural form, they conclude by claiming that it stands for much more than simply a concept. Form, in its ambiguity and heterogeneity, stands for a shared problem, one that brings together disciplines, schools of thought and variant methodological practices, turning therefore the discursive constraints of the past in productive chances for the future.
|
url |
https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/1969 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stavroskousoulas transversingformalisms AT jorgemejiahernandez transversingformalisms |
_version_ |
1724280128260800512 |