Smartphone photography for screening amblyogenic conditions in children

Purpose: To validate the smartphone photography as a screening tool for amblyogenic conditions in children. Methods: Children between 5 to 8 years attending eye out patient department (OPD) were photographed (by an optometrist) with a smartphone to capture their pupillary red reflexes followed by cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Richa Gupta, Siddharth Agrawal, Rajat M Srivastava, Vinita Singh, Vishal Katiyar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=10;spage=1560;epage=1563;aulast=Gupta
id doaj-1b30c0a6a60c46ffa7458ebc2b9f92f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b30c0a6a60c46ffa7458ebc2b9f92f82020-11-25T02:48:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892019-01-0167101560156310.4103/ijo.IJO_2090_18Smartphone photography for screening amblyogenic conditions in childrenRicha GuptaSiddharth AgrawalRajat M SrivastavaVinita SinghVishal KatiyarPurpose: To validate the smartphone photography as a screening tool for amblyogenic conditions in children. Methods: Children between 5 to 8 years attending eye out patient department (OPD) were photographed (by an optometrist) with a smartphone to capture their pupillary red reflexes followed by clinical examination by the principal investigator (PI). The PI on the basis of clinical examination identified children with significant amblyogenic conditions and, subsequently, two ophthalmologists independently categorized the photographs on the basis of color, symmetry, and shape of the pupillary reflex into normal or abnormal. The identification of amblyogenic conditions on clinical examination was compared to that on photography. Refractive errors <3D and anisometropia <2D were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of smartphone photography screening were determined. Results: In all, 250 children were screened. Clinically 23.6% were harboring amblyogenic conditions. The mean sensitivity and specificity of screening by smartphone were 94% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion: Smartphone photography is a reliable tool for detection of amblyogenic conditions in children.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=10;spage=1560;epage=1563;aulast=GuptaAmblyopiasmartphone photographyvision screening
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Richa Gupta
Siddharth Agrawal
Rajat M Srivastava
Vinita Singh
Vishal Katiyar
spellingShingle Richa Gupta
Siddharth Agrawal
Rajat M Srivastava
Vinita Singh
Vishal Katiyar
Smartphone photography for screening amblyogenic conditions in children
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Amblyopia
smartphone photography
vision screening
author_facet Richa Gupta
Siddharth Agrawal
Rajat M Srivastava
Vinita Singh
Vishal Katiyar
author_sort Richa Gupta
title Smartphone photography for screening amblyogenic conditions in children
title_short Smartphone photography for screening amblyogenic conditions in children
title_full Smartphone photography for screening amblyogenic conditions in children
title_fullStr Smartphone photography for screening amblyogenic conditions in children
title_full_unstemmed Smartphone photography for screening amblyogenic conditions in children
title_sort smartphone photography for screening amblyogenic conditions in children
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Purpose: To validate the smartphone photography as a screening tool for amblyogenic conditions in children. Methods: Children between 5 to 8 years attending eye out patient department (OPD) were photographed (by an optometrist) with a smartphone to capture their pupillary red reflexes followed by clinical examination by the principal investigator (PI). The PI on the basis of clinical examination identified children with significant amblyogenic conditions and, subsequently, two ophthalmologists independently categorized the photographs on the basis of color, symmetry, and shape of the pupillary reflex into normal or abnormal. The identification of amblyogenic conditions on clinical examination was compared to that on photography. Refractive errors <3D and anisometropia <2D were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of smartphone photography screening were determined. Results: In all, 250 children were screened. Clinically 23.6% were harboring amblyogenic conditions. The mean sensitivity and specificity of screening by smartphone were 94% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion: Smartphone photography is a reliable tool for detection of amblyogenic conditions in children.
topic Amblyopia
smartphone photography
vision screening
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=10;spage=1560;epage=1563;aulast=Gupta
work_keys_str_mv AT richagupta smartphonephotographyforscreeningamblyogenicconditionsinchildren
AT siddharthagrawal smartphonephotographyforscreeningamblyogenicconditionsinchildren
AT rajatmsrivastava smartphonephotographyforscreeningamblyogenicconditionsinchildren
AT vinitasingh smartphonephotographyforscreeningamblyogenicconditionsinchildren
AT vishalkatiyar smartphonephotographyforscreeningamblyogenicconditionsinchildren
_version_ 1724747957249507328