Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly popular method for rapid biodiversity assessment. As with any ecological survey, false negatives can arise during sampling and, if unaccounted for, lead to biased results and potentially misdiagnosed environmental assessments. We developed a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beverly McClenaghan, Zacchaeus G Compson, Mehrdad Hajibabaei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224119
id doaj-1b2024624fc340c88dd1bdcf4d9fc2f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b2024624fc340c88dd1bdcf4d9fc2f52021-03-03T21:32:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01153e022411910.1371/journal.pone.0224119Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.Beverly McClenaghanZacchaeus G CompsonMehrdad HajibabaeiEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly popular method for rapid biodiversity assessment. As with any ecological survey, false negatives can arise during sampling and, if unaccounted for, lead to biased results and potentially misdiagnosed environmental assessments. We developed a multi-scale, multi-species occupancy model for the analysis of community biodiversity data resulting from eDNA metabarcoding; this model accounts for imperfect detection and additional sources of environmental and experimental variation. We present methods for model assessment and model comparison and demonstrate how these tools improve the inferential power of eDNA metabarcoding data using a case study in a coastal, marine environment. Using occupancy models to account for factors often overlooked in the analysis of eDNA metabarcoding data will dramatically improve ecological inference, sampling design, and methodologies, empowering practitioners with an approach to wield the high-resolution biodiversity data of next-generation sequencing platforms.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224119
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beverly McClenaghan
Zacchaeus G Compson
Mehrdad Hajibabaei
spellingShingle Beverly McClenaghan
Zacchaeus G Compson
Mehrdad Hajibabaei
Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Beverly McClenaghan
Zacchaeus G Compson
Mehrdad Hajibabaei
author_sort Beverly McClenaghan
title Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.
title_short Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.
title_full Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.
title_fullStr Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.
title_full_unstemmed Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.
title_sort validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: a case study using coastal marine edna.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly popular method for rapid biodiversity assessment. As with any ecological survey, false negatives can arise during sampling and, if unaccounted for, lead to biased results and potentially misdiagnosed environmental assessments. We developed a multi-scale, multi-species occupancy model for the analysis of community biodiversity data resulting from eDNA metabarcoding; this model accounts for imperfect detection and additional sources of environmental and experimental variation. We present methods for model assessment and model comparison and demonstrate how these tools improve the inferential power of eDNA metabarcoding data using a case study in a coastal, marine environment. Using occupancy models to account for factors often overlooked in the analysis of eDNA metabarcoding data will dramatically improve ecological inference, sampling design, and methodologies, empowering practitioners with an approach to wield the high-resolution biodiversity data of next-generation sequencing platforms.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224119
work_keys_str_mv AT beverlymcclenaghan validatingmetabarcodingbasedbiodiversityassessmentswithmultispeciesoccupancymodelsacasestudyusingcoastalmarineedna
AT zacchaeusgcompson validatingmetabarcodingbasedbiodiversityassessmentswithmultispeciesoccupancymodelsacasestudyusingcoastalmarineedna
AT mehrdadhajibabaei validatingmetabarcodingbasedbiodiversityassessmentswithmultispeciesoccupancymodelsacasestudyusingcoastalmarineedna
_version_ 1714816345185452032