Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly popular method for rapid biodiversity assessment. As with any ecological survey, false negatives can arise during sampling and, if unaccounted for, lead to biased results and potentially misdiagnosed environmental assessments. We developed a...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224119 |
id |
doaj-1b2024624fc340c88dd1bdcf4d9fc2f5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1b2024624fc340c88dd1bdcf4d9fc2f52021-03-03T21:32:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01153e022411910.1371/journal.pone.0224119Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.Beverly McClenaghanZacchaeus G CompsonMehrdad HajibabaeiEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly popular method for rapid biodiversity assessment. As with any ecological survey, false negatives can arise during sampling and, if unaccounted for, lead to biased results and potentially misdiagnosed environmental assessments. We developed a multi-scale, multi-species occupancy model for the analysis of community biodiversity data resulting from eDNA metabarcoding; this model accounts for imperfect detection and additional sources of environmental and experimental variation. We present methods for model assessment and model comparison and demonstrate how these tools improve the inferential power of eDNA metabarcoding data using a case study in a coastal, marine environment. Using occupancy models to account for factors often overlooked in the analysis of eDNA metabarcoding data will dramatically improve ecological inference, sampling design, and methodologies, empowering practitioners with an approach to wield the high-resolution biodiversity data of next-generation sequencing platforms.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224119 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Beverly McClenaghan Zacchaeus G Compson Mehrdad Hajibabaei |
spellingShingle |
Beverly McClenaghan Zacchaeus G Compson Mehrdad Hajibabaei Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Beverly McClenaghan Zacchaeus G Compson Mehrdad Hajibabaei |
author_sort |
Beverly McClenaghan |
title |
Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA. |
title_short |
Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA. |
title_full |
Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA. |
title_fullStr |
Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA. |
title_sort |
validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: a case study using coastal marine edna. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly popular method for rapid biodiversity assessment. As with any ecological survey, false negatives can arise during sampling and, if unaccounted for, lead to biased results and potentially misdiagnosed environmental assessments. We developed a multi-scale, multi-species occupancy model for the analysis of community biodiversity data resulting from eDNA metabarcoding; this model accounts for imperfect detection and additional sources of environmental and experimental variation. We present methods for model assessment and model comparison and demonstrate how these tools improve the inferential power of eDNA metabarcoding data using a case study in a coastal, marine environment. Using occupancy models to account for factors often overlooked in the analysis of eDNA metabarcoding data will dramatically improve ecological inference, sampling design, and methodologies, empowering practitioners with an approach to wield the high-resolution biodiversity data of next-generation sequencing platforms. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224119 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT beverlymcclenaghan validatingmetabarcodingbasedbiodiversityassessmentswithmultispeciesoccupancymodelsacasestudyusingcoastalmarineedna AT zacchaeusgcompson validatingmetabarcodingbasedbiodiversityassessmentswithmultispeciesoccupancymodelsacasestudyusingcoastalmarineedna AT mehrdadhajibabaei validatingmetabarcodingbasedbiodiversityassessmentswithmultispeciesoccupancymodelsacasestudyusingcoastalmarineedna |
_version_ |
1714816345185452032 |