Breast spindle cell tumours: about eight cases

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast spindle cell tumours (BSCTs), although rare, represent a heterogeneous group with different treatment modalities. This work was undertaken to evaluate the utility of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), histopathology and i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abd El All Howayda S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-07-01
Series:Diagnostic Pathology
Online Access:http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/1/1/13
id doaj-1b1e3f7ff4d14b9bb62c404c6ca284a0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b1e3f7ff4d14b9bb62c404c6ca284a02020-11-24T21:49:48ZengBMCDiagnostic Pathology1746-15962006-07-01111310.1186/1746-1596-1-13Breast spindle cell tumours: about eight casesAbd El All Howayda S<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast spindle cell tumours (BSCTs), although rare, represent a heterogeneous group with different treatment modalities. This work was undertaken to evaluate the utility of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in differentiating BSCTs.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>FNAC of eight breast masses diagnosed cytologically as BSCTs was followed by wide excision biopsy. IHC using a panel of antibodies against vimentin, pan-cytokeratin, s100, desmin, smooth muscle actin, CD34, and CD10 was evaluated to define their nature.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>FNAC defined the tumors as benign (n = 4), suspicious (n = 2) and malignant (n = 3), based on the cytopathological criteria of malignancy. Following wide excision biopsy, the tumors were reclassified into benign (n = 5) and malignant (n = 3). In the benign group, the diagnosis was raised histologically and confirmed by IHC for 3 cases (one spindle cell lipoma, one myofibroblastoma and one leiomyoma). For the remaining two cases, the diagnosis was set up after IHC (one fibromatosis and one spindle cell variant of adenomyoepithelioma). In the malignant group, a leiomyosarcoma was diagnosed histologically, while IHC was crucial to set up the diagnosis of one case of spindle cell carcinoma and one malignant myoepithelioma.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>FNAC in BSCTs is an insufficient tool and should be followed by wide excision biopsy. The latter technique differentiate benign from malignant BSCTs and is able in 50% of the cases to set up the definite diagnosis. IHC is of value to define the nature of different benign lesions and is mandatory in the malignant ones for optimal treatment. Awareness of the different types of BSCTs prevents unnecessary extensive therapeutic regimes.</p> http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/1/1/13
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abd El All Howayda S
spellingShingle Abd El All Howayda S
Breast spindle cell tumours: about eight cases
Diagnostic Pathology
author_facet Abd El All Howayda S
author_sort Abd El All Howayda S
title Breast spindle cell tumours: about eight cases
title_short Breast spindle cell tumours: about eight cases
title_full Breast spindle cell tumours: about eight cases
title_fullStr Breast spindle cell tumours: about eight cases
title_full_unstemmed Breast spindle cell tumours: about eight cases
title_sort breast spindle cell tumours: about eight cases
publisher BMC
series Diagnostic Pathology
issn 1746-1596
publishDate 2006-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Breast spindle cell tumours (BSCTs), although rare, represent a heterogeneous group with different treatment modalities. This work was undertaken to evaluate the utility of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in differentiating BSCTs.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>FNAC of eight breast masses diagnosed cytologically as BSCTs was followed by wide excision biopsy. IHC using a panel of antibodies against vimentin, pan-cytokeratin, s100, desmin, smooth muscle actin, CD34, and CD10 was evaluated to define their nature.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>FNAC defined the tumors as benign (n = 4), suspicious (n = 2) and malignant (n = 3), based on the cytopathological criteria of malignancy. Following wide excision biopsy, the tumors were reclassified into benign (n = 5) and malignant (n = 3). In the benign group, the diagnosis was raised histologically and confirmed by IHC for 3 cases (one spindle cell lipoma, one myofibroblastoma and one leiomyoma). For the remaining two cases, the diagnosis was set up after IHC (one fibromatosis and one spindle cell variant of adenomyoepithelioma). In the malignant group, a leiomyosarcoma was diagnosed histologically, while IHC was crucial to set up the diagnosis of one case of spindle cell carcinoma and one malignant myoepithelioma.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>FNAC in BSCTs is an insufficient tool and should be followed by wide excision biopsy. The latter technique differentiate benign from malignant BSCTs and is able in 50% of the cases to set up the definite diagnosis. IHC is of value to define the nature of different benign lesions and is mandatory in the malignant ones for optimal treatment. Awareness of the different types of BSCTs prevents unnecessary extensive therapeutic regimes.</p>
url http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/1/1/13
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelallhowaydas breastspindlecelltumoursabouteightcases
_version_ 1725887319417815040