Comparison of methods for flow border detection in images of smoke visualization

A separation of the flow region from the surroundings is an essential step in the analysis of smoke visualization images. The separation can be performed using several detection methods from the image segmentation group. This paper deals with the border detection of the air flow downstream of a benc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caletka Petr, Pech Ondrej, Jedelsky Jan, Lizal Frantisek, Jicha Miroslav
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2016-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611402009
id doaj-1b1c3621e33945599f9266674ed5fdaa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b1c3621e33945599f9266674ed5fdaa2021-08-02T18:30:33ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2016-01-011140200910.1051/epjconf/201611402009epjconf_efm2016_02009Comparison of methods for flow border detection in images of smoke visualizationCaletka Petr0Pech Ondrej1Jedelsky Jan2Lizal Frantisek3Jicha Miroslav4Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringBrno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringBrno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringBrno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringBrno University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringA separation of the flow region from the surroundings is an essential step in the analysis of smoke visualization images. The separation can be performed using several detection methods from the image segmentation group. This paper deals with the border detection of the air flow downstream of a benchmark automotive vent using different threshold-based detection methods. An assessment of the methods on the basis of the resulting image quality is also addressed. The quality level depends on the quantity and brightness of disturbances in the background area. The disturbance is usually an isolated region of smoke, which naturally cannot be a part of the flow. Three representative images of different quality levels were selected for the detection, and three methods were used for the evaluation. Each of the methods was used to determine the threshold differently (by the level, by the ratio, and by the change of brightness). It is demonstrated that the change-based method with an appropriately selected parameter is the most convenient for images with the worst quality level while level- and ratio-based methods are only applicable for images of good quality.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611402009
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Caletka Petr
Pech Ondrej
Jedelsky Jan
Lizal Frantisek
Jicha Miroslav
spellingShingle Caletka Petr
Pech Ondrej
Jedelsky Jan
Lizal Frantisek
Jicha Miroslav
Comparison of methods for flow border detection in images of smoke visualization
EPJ Web of Conferences
author_facet Caletka Petr
Pech Ondrej
Jedelsky Jan
Lizal Frantisek
Jicha Miroslav
author_sort Caletka Petr
title Comparison of methods for flow border detection in images of smoke visualization
title_short Comparison of methods for flow border detection in images of smoke visualization
title_full Comparison of methods for flow border detection in images of smoke visualization
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for flow border detection in images of smoke visualization
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for flow border detection in images of smoke visualization
title_sort comparison of methods for flow border detection in images of smoke visualization
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description A separation of the flow region from the surroundings is an essential step in the analysis of smoke visualization images. The separation can be performed using several detection methods from the image segmentation group. This paper deals with the border detection of the air flow downstream of a benchmark automotive vent using different threshold-based detection methods. An assessment of the methods on the basis of the resulting image quality is also addressed. The quality level depends on the quantity and brightness of disturbances in the background area. The disturbance is usually an isolated region of smoke, which naturally cannot be a part of the flow. Three representative images of different quality levels were selected for the detection, and three methods were used for the evaluation. Each of the methods was used to determine the threshold differently (by the level, by the ratio, and by the change of brightness). It is demonstrated that the change-based method with an appropriately selected parameter is the most convenient for images with the worst quality level while level- and ratio-based methods are only applicable for images of good quality.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611402009
work_keys_str_mv AT caletkapetr comparisonofmethodsforflowborderdetectioninimagesofsmokevisualization
AT pechondrej comparisonofmethodsforflowborderdetectioninimagesofsmokevisualization
AT jedelskyjan comparisonofmethodsforflowborderdetectioninimagesofsmokevisualization
AT lizalfrantisek comparisonofmethodsforflowborderdetectioninimagesofsmokevisualization
AT jichamiroslav comparisonofmethodsforflowborderdetectioninimagesofsmokevisualization
_version_ 1721228051892666368