Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: Nanofracture versus hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold with concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic one-stage treatment with hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold (HACS) in combination with a concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate (CBMA) technique compared to nanofracture (NF). Methods: A retros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mesut Tahta, Mustafa Akkaya, Safa Gursoy, Cetin Isik, Murat Bozkurt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-07-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017717870
id doaj-1b0efff032c140bd96825ebd4e68c7fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b0efff032c140bd96825ebd4e68c7fc2020-11-25T02:59:18ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902017-07-012510.1177/2309499017717870Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: Nanofracture versus hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold with concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirateMesut Tahta0Mustafa Akkaya1Safa Gursoy2Cetin Isik3Murat Bozkurt4 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yenimahalle Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yenimahalle Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Yildirim Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Yildirim Beyazıt University, Ankara, TurkeyPurpose: We aimed to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic one-stage treatment with hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold (HACS) in combination with a concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate (CBMA) technique compared to nanofracture (NF). Methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of all the patients with focal osteochondral lesions of the talus that were treated between January 2012 and January 2015. Ninety-eight patients met the criteria and were enrolled in the study. Forty-six patients (group 1) were treated with arthroscopic one-stage treatment with CBMA in combination with an HACS. Fifty-two patients (group 2) were treated with NF. Patient demographics and cartilage defect characteristics, the AOFAS and VAS scoring systems were compared between groups. In the evaluation of cartilage repair tissue, the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scoring system was used. Results: No significant differences were determined between the two groups in terms of age ( p = 0.874), body mass index ( p = 0.621), defect size ( p = 0.485), defect depth ( p = 0.674), follow-up time ( p = 0.512). A significant clinical difference was determined between the two groups according to the AOFAS and VAS scores ( p = 0.028, p = 0.046, respectively). The mean MOCART score of group 1 was significantly higher ( p = 0.041). Conclusions: Both NF and HACS with CBMA techniques are beneficial in treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Better clinical and radiological results, in addition to higher cartilage quality, could be obtained with HACS with CBMA technique compared to NF.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017717870
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mesut Tahta
Mustafa Akkaya
Safa Gursoy
Cetin Isik
Murat Bozkurt
spellingShingle Mesut Tahta
Mustafa Akkaya
Safa Gursoy
Cetin Isik
Murat Bozkurt
Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: Nanofracture versus hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold with concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Mesut Tahta
Mustafa Akkaya
Safa Gursoy
Cetin Isik
Murat Bozkurt
author_sort Mesut Tahta
title Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: Nanofracture versus hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold with concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate
title_short Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: Nanofracture versus hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold with concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate
title_full Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: Nanofracture versus hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold with concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate
title_fullStr Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: Nanofracture versus hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold with concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: Nanofracture versus hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold with concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate
title_sort arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: nanofracture versus hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold with concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic one-stage treatment with hyaluronic acid-based cell-free scaffold (HACS) in combination with a concentration of autologous bone marrow aspirate (CBMA) technique compared to nanofracture (NF). Methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of all the patients with focal osteochondral lesions of the talus that were treated between January 2012 and January 2015. Ninety-eight patients met the criteria and were enrolled in the study. Forty-six patients (group 1) were treated with arthroscopic one-stage treatment with CBMA in combination with an HACS. Fifty-two patients (group 2) were treated with NF. Patient demographics and cartilage defect characteristics, the AOFAS and VAS scoring systems were compared between groups. In the evaluation of cartilage repair tissue, the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scoring system was used. Results: No significant differences were determined between the two groups in terms of age ( p = 0.874), body mass index ( p = 0.621), defect size ( p = 0.485), defect depth ( p = 0.674), follow-up time ( p = 0.512). A significant clinical difference was determined between the two groups according to the AOFAS and VAS scores ( p = 0.028, p = 0.046, respectively). The mean MOCART score of group 1 was significantly higher ( p = 0.041). Conclusions: Both NF and HACS with CBMA techniques are beneficial in treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Better clinical and radiological results, in addition to higher cartilage quality, could be obtained with HACS with CBMA technique compared to NF.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017717870
work_keys_str_mv AT mesuttahta arthroscopictreatmentofosteochondrallesionsofthetalusnanofractureversushyaluronicacidbasedcellfreescaffoldwithconcentrationofautologousbonemarrowaspirate
AT mustafaakkaya arthroscopictreatmentofosteochondrallesionsofthetalusnanofractureversushyaluronicacidbasedcellfreescaffoldwithconcentrationofautologousbonemarrowaspirate
AT safagursoy arthroscopictreatmentofosteochondrallesionsofthetalusnanofractureversushyaluronicacidbasedcellfreescaffoldwithconcentrationofautologousbonemarrowaspirate
AT cetinisik arthroscopictreatmentofosteochondrallesionsofthetalusnanofractureversushyaluronicacidbasedcellfreescaffoldwithconcentrationofautologousbonemarrowaspirate
AT muratbozkurt arthroscopictreatmentofosteochondrallesionsofthetalusnanofractureversushyaluronicacidbasedcellfreescaffoldwithconcentrationofautologousbonemarrowaspirate
_version_ 1724703185892802560