Comparison of confirmation of placement of laryngeal mask airway by fiberoptic laryngoscope and ultrasound examination: A feasibility study

Background: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is widely used as an effective and safe airway adjunct in the routine practice of anesthesia. There are various methods to assess the correct placement, the gold standard being fiberoptic visualization through the LMA. Ultrasound (USG) is a noninvasive, re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suvendu Panda, Chitra Chatterji, V Muralidhar, S K Rojalin Baby, Tulika Shrivastav
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.bjoaonline.com/article.asp?issn=2549-2276;year=2021;volume=5;issue=2;spage=83;epage=87;aulast=Panda
id doaj-1b06d32632b34a9dac74a09296e0d05e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1b06d32632b34a9dac74a09296e0d05e2021-07-27T04:15:25ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsBali Journal of Anesthesiology2549-22762021-01-0152838710.4103/bjoa.bjoa_216_20Comparison of confirmation of placement of laryngeal mask airway by fiberoptic laryngoscope and ultrasound examination: A feasibility studySuvendu PandaChitra ChatterjiV MuralidharS K Rojalin BabyTulika ShrivastavBackground: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is widely used as an effective and safe airway adjunct in the routine practice of anesthesia. There are various methods to assess the correct placement, the gold standard being fiberoptic visualization through the LMA. Ultrasound (USG) is a noninvasive, readily available diagnostic tool and has been used with increased frequency for airway examination. The aim of our study was comparison of fiberoptic and USG evaluation for the confirmation of placement of LMA. Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted on 250 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade 1 and 2, in the age group of 18–65 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with LMA. The position of the LMA cuff was confirmed by USG and reconfirmed with fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FOL). Results: We observed that the USG Grade 1 was seen in 76.8% of patients as compared to FOL Grade 1 seen in 81.6%. The frequency of LMA misplacement (i.e., Grades 2–4) noted with USG was 23.2% and with FOL was 18.4%. The Bland–Altman scatter plot showed insignificant differences between the two grading systems (near-zero mean: 0.05), with small limits of agreement (−0.509 to +0.609). Conclusion: USG can replace fiberoptic examination for confirmation of the correct placement of an LMA. USG can further give insight into the grading of LMA placement and the cause of airway and ventilation events, which can be corrected and prevented.http://www.bjoaonline.com/article.asp?issn=2549-2276;year=2021;volume=5;issue=2;spage=83;epage=87;aulast=Pandafiberopticlaryngeal mask airwayultrasound
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suvendu Panda
Chitra Chatterji
V Muralidhar
S K Rojalin Baby
Tulika Shrivastav
spellingShingle Suvendu Panda
Chitra Chatterji
V Muralidhar
S K Rojalin Baby
Tulika Shrivastav
Comparison of confirmation of placement of laryngeal mask airway by fiberoptic laryngoscope and ultrasound examination: A feasibility study
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
fiberoptic
laryngeal mask airway
ultrasound
author_facet Suvendu Panda
Chitra Chatterji
V Muralidhar
S K Rojalin Baby
Tulika Shrivastav
author_sort Suvendu Panda
title Comparison of confirmation of placement of laryngeal mask airway by fiberoptic laryngoscope and ultrasound examination: A feasibility study
title_short Comparison of confirmation of placement of laryngeal mask airway by fiberoptic laryngoscope and ultrasound examination: A feasibility study
title_full Comparison of confirmation of placement of laryngeal mask airway by fiberoptic laryngoscope and ultrasound examination: A feasibility study
title_fullStr Comparison of confirmation of placement of laryngeal mask airway by fiberoptic laryngoscope and ultrasound examination: A feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of confirmation of placement of laryngeal mask airway by fiberoptic laryngoscope and ultrasound examination: A feasibility study
title_sort comparison of confirmation of placement of laryngeal mask airway by fiberoptic laryngoscope and ultrasound examination: a feasibility study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 2549-2276
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is widely used as an effective and safe airway adjunct in the routine practice of anesthesia. There are various methods to assess the correct placement, the gold standard being fiberoptic visualization through the LMA. Ultrasound (USG) is a noninvasive, readily available diagnostic tool and has been used with increased frequency for airway examination. The aim of our study was comparison of fiberoptic and USG evaluation for the confirmation of placement of LMA. Patients and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted on 250 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade 1 and 2, in the age group of 18–65 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with LMA. The position of the LMA cuff was confirmed by USG and reconfirmed with fiberoptic laryngoscopy (FOL). Results: We observed that the USG Grade 1 was seen in 76.8% of patients as compared to FOL Grade 1 seen in 81.6%. The frequency of LMA misplacement (i.e., Grades 2–4) noted with USG was 23.2% and with FOL was 18.4%. The Bland–Altman scatter plot showed insignificant differences between the two grading systems (near-zero mean: 0.05), with small limits of agreement (−0.509 to +0.609). Conclusion: USG can replace fiberoptic examination for confirmation of the correct placement of an LMA. USG can further give insight into the grading of LMA placement and the cause of airway and ventilation events, which can be corrected and prevented.
topic fiberoptic
laryngeal mask airway
ultrasound
url http://www.bjoaonline.com/article.asp?issn=2549-2276;year=2021;volume=5;issue=2;spage=83;epage=87;aulast=Panda
work_keys_str_mv AT suvendupanda comparisonofconfirmationofplacementoflaryngealmaskairwaybyfiberopticlaryngoscopeandultrasoundexaminationafeasibilitystudy
AT chitrachatterji comparisonofconfirmationofplacementoflaryngealmaskairwaybyfiberopticlaryngoscopeandultrasoundexaminationafeasibilitystudy
AT vmuralidhar comparisonofconfirmationofplacementoflaryngealmaskairwaybyfiberopticlaryngoscopeandultrasoundexaminationafeasibilitystudy
AT skrojalinbaby comparisonofconfirmationofplacementoflaryngealmaskairwaybyfiberopticlaryngoscopeandultrasoundexaminationafeasibilitystudy
AT tulikashrivastav comparisonofconfirmationofplacementoflaryngealmaskairwaybyfiberopticlaryngoscopeandultrasoundexaminationafeasibilitystudy
_version_ 1721280264846442496