COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PORCINE AND BUFFALO SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXTRACELLUALR MATRIX SCAFFOLDS

Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) fromc6-8 months old Large White Yorkshire (LWY)cpigs and 18-24 months old buffaloes werecevaluated for the development of extracellularcmatrix scaffolds. The thickness of SIS from buffalo and LWY pigs did not differ significantly.cBuffalo SIS had significantly highe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. N. Vasudevan, P. Kuttinarayanan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Director of Academics and Research, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University 2016-07-01
Series:Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences
Subjects:
pig
Online Access:https://www.jvas.in/public_html/upload/article_file/article_file_qb2hok.pdf?t=qb2hok
id doaj-1afc597147584140b36799f97c0bea5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1afc597147584140b36799f97c0bea5b2021-08-23T06:57:28ZengDirector of Academics and Research, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences UniversityJournal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences0971-07012582-06052016-07-014725456COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PORCINE AND BUFFALO SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXTRACELLUALR MATRIX SCAFFOLDSV. N. Vasudevan0P. Kuttinarayanan1Department of Livestock Products Technology College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur- 680651.Department of Livestock Products Technology College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur- 680651.Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) fromc6-8 months old Large White Yorkshire (LWY)cpigs and 18-24 months old buffaloes werecevaluated for the development of extracellularcmatrix scaffolds. The thickness of SIS from buffalo and LWY pigs did not differ significantly.cBuffalo SIS had significantly higherfat and totalccollagen contents, and was more resistantcto collagenase degradation than that fromcLWY pigs, but showed a higher content of acid soluble collagen. Buffalo SIS could be a better raw material for scaffold preparation as it is a widely available low-cost by-product. However, the properties of the scaffold may alter with subsequent treatments like defatting, decellularization, cross linking and sterilizationhttps://www.jvas.in/public_html/upload/article_file/article_file_qb2hok.pdf?t=qb2hokextracellular matrix scaffoldssmall intestinal submucosapigbuffalo
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author V. N. Vasudevan
P. Kuttinarayanan
spellingShingle V. N. Vasudevan
P. Kuttinarayanan
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PORCINE AND BUFFALO SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXTRACELLUALR MATRIX SCAFFOLDS
Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences
extracellular matrix scaffolds
small intestinal submucosa
pig
buffalo
author_facet V. N. Vasudevan
P. Kuttinarayanan
author_sort V. N. Vasudevan
title COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PORCINE AND BUFFALO SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXTRACELLUALR MATRIX SCAFFOLDS
title_short COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PORCINE AND BUFFALO SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXTRACELLUALR MATRIX SCAFFOLDS
title_full COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PORCINE AND BUFFALO SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXTRACELLUALR MATRIX SCAFFOLDS
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PORCINE AND BUFFALO SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXTRACELLUALR MATRIX SCAFFOLDS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PORCINE AND BUFFALO SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EXTRACELLUALR MATRIX SCAFFOLDS
title_sort comparative evaluation of porcine and buffalo small intestinal submucosa for the development of extracellualr matrix scaffolds
publisher Director of Academics and Research, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University
series Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences
issn 0971-0701
2582-0605
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) fromc6-8 months old Large White Yorkshire (LWY)cpigs and 18-24 months old buffaloes werecevaluated for the development of extracellularcmatrix scaffolds. The thickness of SIS from buffalo and LWY pigs did not differ significantly.cBuffalo SIS had significantly higherfat and totalccollagen contents, and was more resistantcto collagenase degradation than that fromcLWY pigs, but showed a higher content of acid soluble collagen. Buffalo SIS could be a better raw material for scaffold preparation as it is a widely available low-cost by-product. However, the properties of the scaffold may alter with subsequent treatments like defatting, decellularization, cross linking and sterilization
topic extracellular matrix scaffolds
small intestinal submucosa
pig
buffalo
url https://www.jvas.in/public_html/upload/article_file/article_file_qb2hok.pdf?t=qb2hok
work_keys_str_mv AT vnvasudevan comparativeevaluationofporcineandbuffalosmallintestinalsubmucosaforthedevelopmentofextracellualrmatrixscaffolds
AT pkuttinarayanan comparativeevaluationofporcineandbuffalosmallintestinalsubmucosaforthedevelopmentofextracellualrmatrixscaffolds
_version_ 1721198716532031488