Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.
Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to com...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4642940?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-1ae26d8e69454b258fdf908afdc26559 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1ae26d8e69454b258fdf908afdc265592020-11-25T02:13:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014257210.1371/journal.pone.0142572Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.Iveta SvobodováEva PazourkováAleš HořínekMichaela NovotnáPavel CaldaMarie KorabečnáDetection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to compare this new quantification alternative with real-time PCR (qPCR) as a golden standard for quantitative analysis of cffDNA. In the first stage of study, a DNA quantification standard was used. Clinical samples, including 10 non-pregnant and 35 pregnant women, were analyzed as a next step. Both methods' performance parameters-standard curve linearity, detection limit and measurement precision-were evaluated. ddPCR in comparison with qPCR has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity for analysing of cffDNA and determination of fetal RhD status from maternal circulation, results of both methods strongly correlated. Despite the more demanding workflow, ddPCR was found to be slightly more precise technology, as evaluated using quantitative standard. Regarding the clinical samples, the precision of both methods equalized with decreasing concentrations of tested DNA samples. In case of cffDNA with very low concentrations, variance parameters of both techniques were comparable. Detected levels of fetal cfDNA in maternal plasma were slightly higher than expected and correlated significantly with gestational age as measured by both methods (ddPCR r = 0.459; qPCR r = 0.438).http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4642940?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Iveta Svobodová Eva Pazourková Aleš Hořínek Michaela Novotná Pavel Calda Marie Korabečná |
spellingShingle |
Iveta Svobodová Eva Pazourková Aleš Hořínek Michaela Novotná Pavel Calda Marie Korabečná Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Iveta Svobodová Eva Pazourková Aleš Hořínek Michaela Novotná Pavel Calda Marie Korabečná |
author_sort |
Iveta Svobodová |
title |
Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach. |
title_short |
Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach. |
title_full |
Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach. |
title_fullStr |
Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach. |
title_sort |
performance of droplet digital pcr in non-invasive fetal rhd genotyping - comparison with a routine real-time pcr based approach. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to compare this new quantification alternative with real-time PCR (qPCR) as a golden standard for quantitative analysis of cffDNA. In the first stage of study, a DNA quantification standard was used. Clinical samples, including 10 non-pregnant and 35 pregnant women, were analyzed as a next step. Both methods' performance parameters-standard curve linearity, detection limit and measurement precision-were evaluated. ddPCR in comparison with qPCR has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity for analysing of cffDNA and determination of fetal RhD status from maternal circulation, results of both methods strongly correlated. Despite the more demanding workflow, ddPCR was found to be slightly more precise technology, as evaluated using quantitative standard. Regarding the clinical samples, the precision of both methods equalized with decreasing concentrations of tested DNA samples. In case of cffDNA with very low concentrations, variance parameters of both techniques were comparable. Detected levels of fetal cfDNA in maternal plasma were slightly higher than expected and correlated significantly with gestational age as measured by both methods (ddPCR r = 0.459; qPCR r = 0.438). |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4642940?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ivetasvobodova performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT evapazourkova performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT aleshorinek performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT michaelanovotna performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT pavelcalda performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach AT mariekorabecna performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach |
_version_ |
1724905913041551360 |