Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.

Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iveta Svobodová, Eva Pazourková, Aleš Hořínek, Michaela Novotná, Pavel Calda, Marie Korabečná
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4642940?pdf=render
id doaj-1ae26d8e69454b258fdf908afdc26559
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ae26d8e69454b258fdf908afdc265592020-11-25T02:13:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011011e014257210.1371/journal.pone.0142572Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.Iveta SvobodováEva PazourkováAleš HořínekMichaela NovotnáPavel CaldaMarie KorabečnáDetection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to compare this new quantification alternative with real-time PCR (qPCR) as a golden standard for quantitative analysis of cffDNA. In the first stage of study, a DNA quantification standard was used. Clinical samples, including 10 non-pregnant and 35 pregnant women, were analyzed as a next step. Both methods' performance parameters-standard curve linearity, detection limit and measurement precision-were evaluated. ddPCR in comparison with qPCR has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity for analysing of cffDNA and determination of fetal RhD status from maternal circulation, results of both methods strongly correlated. Despite the more demanding workflow, ddPCR was found to be slightly more precise technology, as evaluated using quantitative standard. Regarding the clinical samples, the precision of both methods equalized with decreasing concentrations of tested DNA samples. In case of cffDNA with very low concentrations, variance parameters of both techniques were comparable. Detected levels of fetal cfDNA in maternal plasma were slightly higher than expected and correlated significantly with gestational age as measured by both methods (ddPCR r = 0.459; qPCR r = 0.438).http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4642940?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iveta Svobodová
Eva Pazourková
Aleš Hořínek
Michaela Novotná
Pavel Calda
Marie Korabečná
spellingShingle Iveta Svobodová
Eva Pazourková
Aleš Hořínek
Michaela Novotná
Pavel Calda
Marie Korabečná
Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Iveta Svobodová
Eva Pazourková
Aleš Hořínek
Michaela Novotná
Pavel Calda
Marie Korabečná
author_sort Iveta Svobodová
title Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.
title_short Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.
title_full Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.
title_fullStr Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in Non-Invasive Fetal RHD Genotyping - Comparison with a Routine Real-Time PCR Based Approach.
title_sort performance of droplet digital pcr in non-invasive fetal rhd genotyping - comparison with a routine real-time pcr based approach.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Detection and characterization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from maternal circulation requires an extremely sensitive and precise method due to very low cffDNA concentration. In our study, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was implemented for fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma to compare this new quantification alternative with real-time PCR (qPCR) as a golden standard for quantitative analysis of cffDNA. In the first stage of study, a DNA quantification standard was used. Clinical samples, including 10 non-pregnant and 35 pregnant women, were analyzed as a next step. Both methods' performance parameters-standard curve linearity, detection limit and measurement precision-were evaluated. ddPCR in comparison with qPCR has demonstrated sufficient sensitivity for analysing of cffDNA and determination of fetal RhD status from maternal circulation, results of both methods strongly correlated. Despite the more demanding workflow, ddPCR was found to be slightly more precise technology, as evaluated using quantitative standard. Regarding the clinical samples, the precision of both methods equalized with decreasing concentrations of tested DNA samples. In case of cffDNA with very low concentrations, variance parameters of both techniques were comparable. Detected levels of fetal cfDNA in maternal plasma were slightly higher than expected and correlated significantly with gestational age as measured by both methods (ddPCR r = 0.459; qPCR r = 0.438).
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4642940?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ivetasvobodova performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT evapazourkova performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT aleshorinek performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT michaelanovotna performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT pavelcalda performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
AT mariekorabecna performanceofdropletdigitalpcrinnoninvasivefetalrhdgenotypingcomparisonwitharoutinerealtimepcrbasedapproach
_version_ 1724905913041551360