Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?

Magnetism and nematic order are the two nonsuperconducting orders observed in iron-based superconductors. To elucidate the interplay between them and ultimately unveil the pairing mechanism, several models have been investigated. In models with quenched orbital degrees of freedom, magnetic fluctuati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrey V. Chubukov, M. Khodas, Rafael M. Fernandes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2016-12-01
Series:Physical Review X
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041045
id doaj-1ada2a1854e34a9ab89b201e89120834
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ada2a1854e34a9ab89b201e891208342020-11-24T23:37:47ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review X2160-33082016-12-016404104510.1103/PhysRevX.6.041045Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?Andrey V. ChubukovM. KhodasRafael M. FernandesMagnetism and nematic order are the two nonsuperconducting orders observed in iron-based superconductors. To elucidate the interplay between them and ultimately unveil the pairing mechanism, several models have been investigated. In models with quenched orbital degrees of freedom, magnetic fluctuations promote stripe magnetism, which induces orbital order. In models with quenched spin degrees of freedom, charge fluctuations promote spontaneous orbital order, which induces stripe magnetism. Here, we develop an unbiased approach, in which we treat magnetic and orbital fluctuations on equal footing. Key to our approach is the inclusion of the orbital character of the low-energy electronic states into renormalization group (RG) analysis. We analyze the RG flow of the couplings and argue that the same magnetic fluctuations, which are known to promote s^{+-} superconductivity, also promote an attraction in the orbital channel, even if the bare orbital interaction is repulsive. We next analyze the RG flow of the susceptibilities and show that, if all Fermi pockets are small, the system first develops a spontaneous orbital order, then s^{+-} superconductivity, and magnetic order does not develop down to T=0. We argue that this scenario applies to FeSe. In systems with larger pockets, such as BaFe_{2}As_{2} and LaFeAsO, we find that the leading instability is either towards a spin-density wave or superconductivity. We argue that in this situation nematic order is caused by composite spin fluctuations and is vestigial to stripe magnetism. Our results provide a unifying description of different iron-based materials.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041045
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrey V. Chubukov
M. Khodas
Rafael M. Fernandes
spellingShingle Andrey V. Chubukov
M. Khodas
Rafael M. Fernandes
Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?
Physical Review X
author_facet Andrey V. Chubukov
M. Khodas
Rafael M. Fernandes
author_sort Andrey V. Chubukov
title Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?
title_short Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?
title_full Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?
title_fullStr Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?
title_full_unstemmed Magnetism, Superconductivity, and Spontaneous Orbital Order in Iron-Based Superconductors: Which Comes First and Why?
title_sort magnetism, superconductivity, and spontaneous orbital order in iron-based superconductors: which comes first and why?
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review X
issn 2160-3308
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Magnetism and nematic order are the two nonsuperconducting orders observed in iron-based superconductors. To elucidate the interplay between them and ultimately unveil the pairing mechanism, several models have been investigated. In models with quenched orbital degrees of freedom, magnetic fluctuations promote stripe magnetism, which induces orbital order. In models with quenched spin degrees of freedom, charge fluctuations promote spontaneous orbital order, which induces stripe magnetism. Here, we develop an unbiased approach, in which we treat magnetic and orbital fluctuations on equal footing. Key to our approach is the inclusion of the orbital character of the low-energy electronic states into renormalization group (RG) analysis. We analyze the RG flow of the couplings and argue that the same magnetic fluctuations, which are known to promote s^{+-} superconductivity, also promote an attraction in the orbital channel, even if the bare orbital interaction is repulsive. We next analyze the RG flow of the susceptibilities and show that, if all Fermi pockets are small, the system first develops a spontaneous orbital order, then s^{+-} superconductivity, and magnetic order does not develop down to T=0. We argue that this scenario applies to FeSe. In systems with larger pockets, such as BaFe_{2}As_{2} and LaFeAsO, we find that the leading instability is either towards a spin-density wave or superconductivity. We argue that in this situation nematic order is caused by composite spin fluctuations and is vestigial to stripe magnetism. Our results provide a unifying description of different iron-based materials.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041045
work_keys_str_mv AT andreyvchubukov magnetismsuperconductivityandspontaneousorbitalorderinironbasedsuperconductorswhichcomesfirstandwhy
AT mkhodas magnetismsuperconductivityandspontaneousorbitalorderinironbasedsuperconductorswhichcomesfirstandwhy
AT rafaelmfernandes magnetismsuperconductivityandspontaneousorbitalorderinironbasedsuperconductorswhichcomesfirstandwhy
_version_ 1716292973377880064