The utility of using a hand clerking sheet for initial assessment of hand-related injuries

Objectives: Our study aims to develop and evaluate the practicality, clinical merit, and usefulness of a hand clerking sheet for use in a clinical orthopedic surgical unit. We hypothesize that the cause and extent of damage to anatomical structures will be more accurately documented in concordance w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin T K Ding, Vaikunthan Rajaratnam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499016684974
id doaj-1acce84e15bb435aa14dabb0e4c63083
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1acce84e15bb435aa14dabb0e4c630832020-11-25T03:40:52ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902017-01-012510.1177/2309499016684974The utility of using a hand clerking sheet for initial assessment of hand-related injuriesBenjamin T K DingVaikunthan RajaratnamObjectives: Our study aims to develop and evaluate the practicality, clinical merit, and usefulness of a hand clerking sheet for use in a clinical orthopedic surgical unit. We hypothesize that the cause and extent of damage to anatomical structures will be more accurately documented in concordance with intraoperative findings when evaluated with the clerking sheet. Materials and method: All patients admitted to a tertiary care institute for hand-related injuries requiring acute surgical intervention within a 1-year period were evaluated. Assessments made preoperatively without the clerking sheet were evaluated retrospectively. Data concerning cause and extent of damage to anatomical structures were recorded using the hand clerking sheet for all newly admitted cases. The number of injuries documented prior to surgery and intraoperatively was compared. Results: Patients who were assessed without the use of a clerking sheet had their injuries diagnosed with 61% accuracy (96/157), while patients who were assessed with the use of a clerking sheet were diagnosed with 91% accuracy (146/160). Overall, injuries evaluated with the clerking sheet were more accurate than without the aid of the clerking sheet 91% versus 61% ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: The high level of concurrence supports the view that patients admitted for hand-related injuries that were assessed with the aid of a hand clerking sheet or hand chart were diagnosed more accurately.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499016684974
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin T K Ding
Vaikunthan Rajaratnam
spellingShingle Benjamin T K Ding
Vaikunthan Rajaratnam
The utility of using a hand clerking sheet for initial assessment of hand-related injuries
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Benjamin T K Ding
Vaikunthan Rajaratnam
author_sort Benjamin T K Ding
title The utility of using a hand clerking sheet for initial assessment of hand-related injuries
title_short The utility of using a hand clerking sheet for initial assessment of hand-related injuries
title_full The utility of using a hand clerking sheet for initial assessment of hand-related injuries
title_fullStr The utility of using a hand clerking sheet for initial assessment of hand-related injuries
title_full_unstemmed The utility of using a hand clerking sheet for initial assessment of hand-related injuries
title_sort utility of using a hand clerking sheet for initial assessment of hand-related injuries
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Objectives: Our study aims to develop and evaluate the practicality, clinical merit, and usefulness of a hand clerking sheet for use in a clinical orthopedic surgical unit. We hypothesize that the cause and extent of damage to anatomical structures will be more accurately documented in concordance with intraoperative findings when evaluated with the clerking sheet. Materials and method: All patients admitted to a tertiary care institute for hand-related injuries requiring acute surgical intervention within a 1-year period were evaluated. Assessments made preoperatively without the clerking sheet were evaluated retrospectively. Data concerning cause and extent of damage to anatomical structures were recorded using the hand clerking sheet for all newly admitted cases. The number of injuries documented prior to surgery and intraoperatively was compared. Results: Patients who were assessed without the use of a clerking sheet had their injuries diagnosed with 61% accuracy (96/157), while patients who were assessed with the use of a clerking sheet were diagnosed with 91% accuracy (146/160). Overall, injuries evaluated with the clerking sheet were more accurate than without the aid of the clerking sheet 91% versus 61% ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: The high level of concurrence supports the view that patients admitted for hand-related injuries that were assessed with the aid of a hand clerking sheet or hand chart were diagnosed more accurately.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499016684974
work_keys_str_mv AT benjamintkding theutilityofusingahandclerkingsheetforinitialassessmentofhandrelatedinjuries
AT vaikunthanrajaratnam theutilityofusingahandclerkingsheetforinitialassessmentofhandrelatedinjuries
AT benjamintkding utilityofusingahandclerkingsheetforinitialassessmentofhandrelatedinjuries
AT vaikunthanrajaratnam utilityofusingahandclerkingsheetforinitialassessmentofhandrelatedinjuries
_version_ 1724532433271914496