Information system interoperability maturity model

Management of higher education (HE) cannot run if not yet have technological resources that can meet the needs of the campus community and stakeholders. The focus of this research was to look beyond the use of information systems (IS) of universities in Kopertis III Jakarta on the maturity level of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bayu Koen Anggoro, Musa Hubeis, Illah Sailah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Scientic Computing and Electronics, Engineering (ASCEE) 2018-07-01
Series:Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pubs.ascee.org/index.php/businta/article/view/103
id doaj-1ab1cffd5cbc42648fd6f32b7a61ebee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ab1cffd5cbc42648fd6f32b7a61ebee2020-11-25T00:38:16ZengAssociation for Scientic Computing and Electronics, Engineering (ASCEE) Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application2614-00472018-07-0121223310.31763/businta.v2i1.103103Information system interoperability maturity modelBayu Koen AnggoroMusa HubeisIllah SailahManagement of higher education (HE) cannot run if not yet have technological resources that can meet the needs of the campus community and stakeholders. The focus of this research was to look beyond the use of information systems (IS) of universities in Kopertis III Jakarta on the maturity level of data interoperability, software, communication, and physical IS. Using the Information System Interoperability Maturity Model (ISIMM), this study resulted in an average level of university located at level 3 (Collaborative) indicating the relationship between data was wider to facilitate IS, logical data model was shared and used in the data exchange process and no separation or the data sharing impacts on the easy exchange of information. The optimization of IS interoperability attributes (ease of access), develops ISIMM-based roadmap IS (planning), determines the main problem solving target (improvement), and improves the quality of IS based on importance level were some suggestions that university managers can make in order to advance IS.https://pubs.ascee.org/index.php/businta/article/view/103InteroperabilityInformation systemMaturity levelPrivate universities
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bayu Koen Anggoro
Musa Hubeis
Illah Sailah
spellingShingle Bayu Koen Anggoro
Musa Hubeis
Illah Sailah
Information system interoperability maturity model
Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application
Interoperability
Information system
Maturity level
Private universities
author_facet Bayu Koen Anggoro
Musa Hubeis
Illah Sailah
author_sort Bayu Koen Anggoro
title Information system interoperability maturity model
title_short Information system interoperability maturity model
title_full Information system interoperability maturity model
title_fullStr Information system interoperability maturity model
title_full_unstemmed Information system interoperability maturity model
title_sort information system interoperability maturity model
publisher Association for Scientic Computing and Electronics, Engineering (ASCEE)
series Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application
issn 2614-0047
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Management of higher education (HE) cannot run if not yet have technological resources that can meet the needs of the campus community and stakeholders. The focus of this research was to look beyond the use of information systems (IS) of universities in Kopertis III Jakarta on the maturity level of data interoperability, software, communication, and physical IS. Using the Information System Interoperability Maturity Model (ISIMM), this study resulted in an average level of university located at level 3 (Collaborative) indicating the relationship between data was wider to facilitate IS, logical data model was shared and used in the data exchange process and no separation or the data sharing impacts on the easy exchange of information. The optimization of IS interoperability attributes (ease of access), develops ISIMM-based roadmap IS (planning), determines the main problem solving target (improvement), and improves the quality of IS based on importance level were some suggestions that university managers can make in order to advance IS.
topic Interoperability
Information system
Maturity level
Private universities
url https://pubs.ascee.org/index.php/businta/article/view/103
work_keys_str_mv AT bayukoenanggoro informationsysteminteroperabilitymaturitymodel
AT musahubeis informationsysteminteroperabilitymaturitymodel
AT illahsailah informationsysteminteroperabilitymaturitymodel
_version_ 1725298056748859392