A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure

Background: Bone grafts are used in approximately one half of all musculoskeletal surgeries. Autograft bone is the historic gold standard but is limited in supply and its harvest imparts significant morbidity to the patient. Alternative sources of bone graft include allografts, synthetics and, less...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel N. Bracey, Thorsten M. Seyler, Alexander H. Jinnah, Mark O. Lively, Jeffrey S. Willey, Thomas L. Smith, Mark E. Van Dyke, Patrick W. Whitlock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-07-01
Series:Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/9/3/45
id doaj-1aada6af6d63445fb5ca8d05f5c71a0c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1aada6af6d63445fb5ca8d05f5c71a0c2020-11-25T01:05:57ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Biomaterials2079-49832018-07-01934510.3390/jfb9030045jfb9030045A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and StructureDaniel N. Bracey0Thorsten M. Seyler1Alexander H. Jinnah2Mark O. Lively3Jeffrey S. Willey4Thomas L. Smith5Mark E. Van Dyke6Patrick W. Whitlock7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Biochemistry, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USABackground: Bone grafts are used in approximately one half of all musculoskeletal surgeries. Autograft bone is the historic gold standard but is limited in supply and its harvest imparts significant morbidity to the patient. Alternative sources of bone graft include allografts, synthetics and, less commonly, xenografts which are taken from animal species. Xenografts are available in unlimited supply from healthy animal donors with controlled biology, avoiding the risk of human disease transmission, and may satisfy current demand for bone graft products. Methods: In the current study, cancellous bone was harvested from porcine femurs and subjected to a novel decellularization protocol to derive a bone scaffold. Results: The scaffold was devoid of donor cellular material on histology and DNA sampling (p < 0.01). Microarchitectural properties important for osteoconductive potential were preserved after decellularization as shown by high resolution imaging modalities. Proteomics data demonstrated similar profiles when comparing the porcine bone scaffold against commercially available human demineralized bone matrix approved for clinical use. Conclusion: We are unaware of any porcine-derived bone graft products currently used in orthopaedic surgery practice. Results from the current study suggest that porcine-derived bone scaffolds warrant further consideration to serve as a potential bone graft substitute.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/9/3/45xenograftscaffolddecellularizedosteoconductivebone graftporcine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel N. Bracey
Thorsten M. Seyler
Alexander H. Jinnah
Mark O. Lively
Jeffrey S. Willey
Thomas L. Smith
Mark E. Van Dyke
Patrick W. Whitlock
spellingShingle Daniel N. Bracey
Thorsten M. Seyler
Alexander H. Jinnah
Mark O. Lively
Jeffrey S. Willey
Thomas L. Smith
Mark E. Van Dyke
Patrick W. Whitlock
A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
xenograft
scaffold
decellularized
osteoconductive
bone graft
porcine
author_facet Daniel N. Bracey
Thorsten M. Seyler
Alexander H. Jinnah
Mark O. Lively
Jeffrey S. Willey
Thomas L. Smith
Mark E. Van Dyke
Patrick W. Whitlock
author_sort Daniel N. Bracey
title A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure
title_short A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure
title_full A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure
title_fullStr A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure
title_full_unstemmed A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure
title_sort decellularized porcine xenograft-derived bone scaffold for clinical use as a bone graft substitute: a critical evaluation of processing and structure
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Functional Biomaterials
issn 2079-4983
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Background: Bone grafts are used in approximately one half of all musculoskeletal surgeries. Autograft bone is the historic gold standard but is limited in supply and its harvest imparts significant morbidity to the patient. Alternative sources of bone graft include allografts, synthetics and, less commonly, xenografts which are taken from animal species. Xenografts are available in unlimited supply from healthy animal donors with controlled biology, avoiding the risk of human disease transmission, and may satisfy current demand for bone graft products. Methods: In the current study, cancellous bone was harvested from porcine femurs and subjected to a novel decellularization protocol to derive a bone scaffold. Results: The scaffold was devoid of donor cellular material on histology and DNA sampling (p < 0.01). Microarchitectural properties important for osteoconductive potential were preserved after decellularization as shown by high resolution imaging modalities. Proteomics data demonstrated similar profiles when comparing the porcine bone scaffold against commercially available human demineralized bone matrix approved for clinical use. Conclusion: We are unaware of any porcine-derived bone graft products currently used in orthopaedic surgery practice. Results from the current study suggest that porcine-derived bone scaffolds warrant further consideration to serve as a potential bone graft substitute.
topic xenograft
scaffold
decellularized
osteoconductive
bone graft
porcine
url http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/9/3/45
work_keys_str_mv AT danielnbracey adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT thorstenmseyler adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT alexanderhjinnah adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT markolively adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT jeffreyswilley adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT thomaslsmith adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT markevandyke adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT patrickwwhitlock adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT danielnbracey decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT thorstenmseyler decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT alexanderhjinnah decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT markolively decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT jeffreyswilley decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT thomaslsmith decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT markevandyke decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
AT patrickwwhitlock decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure
_version_ 1725192203188305920