A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure
Background: Bone grafts are used in approximately one half of all musculoskeletal surgeries. Autograft bone is the historic gold standard but is limited in supply and its harvest imparts significant morbidity to the patient. Alternative sources of bone graft include allografts, synthetics and, less...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Functional Biomaterials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/9/3/45 |
id |
doaj-1aada6af6d63445fb5ca8d05f5c71a0c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1aada6af6d63445fb5ca8d05f5c71a0c2020-11-25T01:05:57ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Biomaterials2079-49832018-07-01934510.3390/jfb9030045jfb9030045A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and StructureDaniel N. Bracey0Thorsten M. Seyler1Alexander H. Jinnah2Mark O. Lively3Jeffrey S. Willey4Thomas L. Smith5Mark E. Van Dyke6Patrick W. Whitlock7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Biochemistry, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USADepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USABackground: Bone grafts are used in approximately one half of all musculoskeletal surgeries. Autograft bone is the historic gold standard but is limited in supply and its harvest imparts significant morbidity to the patient. Alternative sources of bone graft include allografts, synthetics and, less commonly, xenografts which are taken from animal species. Xenografts are available in unlimited supply from healthy animal donors with controlled biology, avoiding the risk of human disease transmission, and may satisfy current demand for bone graft products. Methods: In the current study, cancellous bone was harvested from porcine femurs and subjected to a novel decellularization protocol to derive a bone scaffold. Results: The scaffold was devoid of donor cellular material on histology and DNA sampling (p < 0.01). Microarchitectural properties important for osteoconductive potential were preserved after decellularization as shown by high resolution imaging modalities. Proteomics data demonstrated similar profiles when comparing the porcine bone scaffold against commercially available human demineralized bone matrix approved for clinical use. Conclusion: We are unaware of any porcine-derived bone graft products currently used in orthopaedic surgery practice. Results from the current study suggest that porcine-derived bone scaffolds warrant further consideration to serve as a potential bone graft substitute.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/9/3/45xenograftscaffolddecellularizedosteoconductivebone graftporcine |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel N. Bracey Thorsten M. Seyler Alexander H. Jinnah Mark O. Lively Jeffrey S. Willey Thomas L. Smith Mark E. Van Dyke Patrick W. Whitlock |
spellingShingle |
Daniel N. Bracey Thorsten M. Seyler Alexander H. Jinnah Mark O. Lively Jeffrey S. Willey Thomas L. Smith Mark E. Van Dyke Patrick W. Whitlock A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure Journal of Functional Biomaterials xenograft scaffold decellularized osteoconductive bone graft porcine |
author_facet |
Daniel N. Bracey Thorsten M. Seyler Alexander H. Jinnah Mark O. Lively Jeffrey S. Willey Thomas L. Smith Mark E. Van Dyke Patrick W. Whitlock |
author_sort |
Daniel N. Bracey |
title |
A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure |
title_short |
A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure |
title_full |
A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure |
title_fullStr |
A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure |
title_sort |
decellularized porcine xenograft-derived bone scaffold for clinical use as a bone graft substitute: a critical evaluation of processing and structure |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Functional Biomaterials |
issn |
2079-4983 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
Background: Bone grafts are used in approximately one half of all musculoskeletal surgeries. Autograft bone is the historic gold standard but is limited in supply and its harvest imparts significant morbidity to the patient. Alternative sources of bone graft include allografts, synthetics and, less commonly, xenografts which are taken from animal species. Xenografts are available in unlimited supply from healthy animal donors with controlled biology, avoiding the risk of human disease transmission, and may satisfy current demand for bone graft products. Methods: In the current study, cancellous bone was harvested from porcine femurs and subjected to a novel decellularization protocol to derive a bone scaffold. Results: The scaffold was devoid of donor cellular material on histology and DNA sampling (p < 0.01). Microarchitectural properties important for osteoconductive potential were preserved after decellularization as shown by high resolution imaging modalities. Proteomics data demonstrated similar profiles when comparing the porcine bone scaffold against commercially available human demineralized bone matrix approved for clinical use. Conclusion: We are unaware of any porcine-derived bone graft products currently used in orthopaedic surgery practice. Results from the current study suggest that porcine-derived bone scaffolds warrant further consideration to serve as a potential bone graft substitute. |
topic |
xenograft scaffold decellularized osteoconductive bone graft porcine |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/9/3/45 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielnbracey adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT thorstenmseyler adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT alexanderhjinnah adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT markolively adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT jeffreyswilley adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT thomaslsmith adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT markevandyke adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT patrickwwhitlock adecellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT danielnbracey decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT thorstenmseyler decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT alexanderhjinnah decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT markolively decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT jeffreyswilley decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT thomaslsmith decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT markevandyke decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure AT patrickwwhitlock decellularizedporcinexenograftderivedbonescaffoldforclinicaluseasabonegraftsubstituteacriticalevaluationofprocessingandstructure |
_version_ |
1725192203188305920 |