Patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: What have we learned from APPROACH-IS?
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are “any outcome based on data provided by patients or patient proxy as opposed to data provided from other sources”. Together with clinician-reported, physiological, and caregiver-reported outcomes, PROs are important sources of data to assess health and well-being....
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-02-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668520300744 |
id |
doaj-1aa5643bcc9c44ceb9da9c3fba6e4af6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1aa5643bcc9c44ceb9da9c3fba6e4af62021-06-07T07:07:27ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease2666-66852021-02-012100074Patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: What have we learned from APPROACH-IS?Philip Moons0Koen Luyckx1Adrienne H. Kovacs2KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Corresponding author. KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.KU Leuven School Psychology and Development in Context, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; UNIBS, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South AfricaKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USAPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are “any outcome based on data provided by patients or patient proxy as opposed to data provided from other sources”. Together with clinician-reported, physiological, and caregiver-reported outcomes, PROs are important sources of data to assess health and well-being. Examples of PROs include quality of life, psychosocial well-being, functional status, symptoms, health behaviours, and adherence to treatment. PRO research requires specific methodologies, for which dedicated expertise is needed. In congenital heart disease (CHD), PRO research has received increasing attention over the past decade. This paper summarizes knowledge advancements achieved by the ‘Assessment of Patterns of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart disease-International Study’ (APPROACH-IS). This was an international project conducted in 15 countries situated on 5 continents, and enrolled more than 4000 patients. Using a uniform research methodology, a broad set of correlates of PROs in CHD was investigated, both at the individual and contextual level. APPROACH-IS confirmed intercountry variation in PROs. Furthermore, several country-level characteristics were associated with PROs in CHD, although they explained little of the variance. Indeed, most of the variance in PROs was explained by individual medical, demographic, behavioural, psychological, and social factors. Although much has been learned about PROs in CHD as a result of APPROACH-IS, this project also generated new questions. The assessment of PROs must thus remain a research priority.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668520300744Patient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeHeart defectsCongenitalDepressionAnxiety |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Philip Moons Koen Luyckx Adrienne H. Kovacs |
spellingShingle |
Philip Moons Koen Luyckx Adrienne H. Kovacs Patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: What have we learned from APPROACH-IS? International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease Patient-reported outcomes Quality of life Heart defects Congenital Depression Anxiety |
author_facet |
Philip Moons Koen Luyckx Adrienne H. Kovacs |
author_sort |
Philip Moons |
title |
Patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: What have we learned from APPROACH-IS? |
title_short |
Patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: What have we learned from APPROACH-IS? |
title_full |
Patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: What have we learned from APPROACH-IS? |
title_fullStr |
Patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: What have we learned from APPROACH-IS? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: What have we learned from APPROACH-IS? |
title_sort |
patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: what have we learned from approach-is? |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease |
issn |
2666-6685 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are “any outcome based on data provided by patients or patient proxy as opposed to data provided from other sources”. Together with clinician-reported, physiological, and caregiver-reported outcomes, PROs are important sources of data to assess health and well-being. Examples of PROs include quality of life, psychosocial well-being, functional status, symptoms, health behaviours, and adherence to treatment. PRO research requires specific methodologies, for which dedicated expertise is needed. In congenital heart disease (CHD), PRO research has received increasing attention over the past decade. This paper summarizes knowledge advancements achieved by the ‘Assessment of Patterns of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart disease-International Study’ (APPROACH-IS). This was an international project conducted in 15 countries situated on 5 continents, and enrolled more than 4000 patients. Using a uniform research methodology, a broad set of correlates of PROs in CHD was investigated, both at the individual and contextual level. APPROACH-IS confirmed intercountry variation in PROs. Furthermore, several country-level characteristics were associated with PROs in CHD, although they explained little of the variance. Indeed, most of the variance in PROs was explained by individual medical, demographic, behavioural, psychological, and social factors. Although much has been learned about PROs in CHD as a result of APPROACH-IS, this project also generated new questions. The assessment of PROs must thus remain a research priority. |
topic |
Patient-reported outcomes Quality of life Heart defects Congenital Depression Anxiety |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668520300744 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT philipmoons patientreportedoutcomesinadultswithcongenitalheartdiseasewhathavewelearnedfromapproachis AT koenluyckx patientreportedoutcomesinadultswithcongenitalheartdiseasewhathavewelearnedfromapproachis AT adriennehkovacs patientreportedoutcomesinadultswithcongenitalheartdiseasewhathavewelearnedfromapproachis |
_version_ |
1721391437696729088 |