The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition

For the past half-century, psycholinguistic research has concerned itself with two mysteries of human cognition: (1) that children universally acquire a highly abstract, computationally complex set of linguistic rules rapidly and effortlessly, and (2) that second language acquisition (SLA) among adu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: L. Kirk Hagen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2008-01-01
Series:Evolutionary Psychology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600105
id doaj-1a9625221d1845f3b34b0e77026a9bd8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a9625221d1845f3b34b0e77026a9bd82020-11-25T03:03:22ZengSAGE PublishingEvolutionary Psychology1474-70492008-01-01610.1177/14747049080060010510.1177_147470490800600105The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language AcquisitionL. Kirk HagenFor the past half-century, psycholinguistic research has concerned itself with two mysteries of human cognition: (1) that children universally acquire a highly abstract, computationally complex set of linguistic rules rapidly and effortlessly, and (2) that second language acquisition (SLA) among adults is, conversely, slow, laborious, highly variable, and virtually never results in native fluency. We now have a decent, if approximate, understanding of the biological foundations of first language acquisition, thanks in large part to Lenneberg's (1964, 1984) seminal work on the critical period hypothesis. More recently, the elements of a promising theory of language and evolution have emerged as well (see e.g. Bickerton, 1981 , 1990 ; Leiberman, 1984, 1987). I argue here that the empirical foundations of an evolutionary theory of language are now solid enough to support an account of bilingualism and adult SLA as well. Specifically, I will show that evidence from the environment of evolutionary adaptation of paleolithic humans suggests that for our nomadic ancestors, the ability to master a language early in life was an eminently useful adaptation. However, the ability to acquire another language in adulthood was not, and consequently was not selected for propagation.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600105
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. Kirk Hagen
spellingShingle L. Kirk Hagen
The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition
Evolutionary Psychology
author_facet L. Kirk Hagen
author_sort L. Kirk Hagen
title The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition
title_short The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition
title_full The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition
title_fullStr The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition
title_full_unstemmed The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition
title_sort bilingual brain: human evolution and second language acquisition
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Evolutionary Psychology
issn 1474-7049
publishDate 2008-01-01
description For the past half-century, psycholinguistic research has concerned itself with two mysteries of human cognition: (1) that children universally acquire a highly abstract, computationally complex set of linguistic rules rapidly and effortlessly, and (2) that second language acquisition (SLA) among adults is, conversely, slow, laborious, highly variable, and virtually never results in native fluency. We now have a decent, if approximate, understanding of the biological foundations of first language acquisition, thanks in large part to Lenneberg's (1964, 1984) seminal work on the critical period hypothesis. More recently, the elements of a promising theory of language and evolution have emerged as well (see e.g. Bickerton, 1981 , 1990 ; Leiberman, 1984, 1987). I argue here that the empirical foundations of an evolutionary theory of language are now solid enough to support an account of bilingualism and adult SLA as well. Specifically, I will show that evidence from the environment of evolutionary adaptation of paleolithic humans suggests that for our nomadic ancestors, the ability to master a language early in life was an eminently useful adaptation. However, the ability to acquire another language in adulthood was not, and consequently was not selected for propagation.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600105
work_keys_str_mv AT lkirkhagen thebilingualbrainhumanevolutionandsecondlanguageacquisition
AT lkirkhagen bilingualbrainhumanevolutionandsecondlanguageacquisition
_version_ 1724686128291774464