The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition
For the past half-century, psycholinguistic research has concerned itself with two mysteries of human cognition: (1) that children universally acquire a highly abstract, computationally complex set of linguistic rules rapidly and effortlessly, and (2) that second language acquisition (SLA) among adu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Evolutionary Psychology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600105 |
id |
doaj-1a9625221d1845f3b34b0e77026a9bd8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1a9625221d1845f3b34b0e77026a9bd82020-11-25T03:03:22ZengSAGE PublishingEvolutionary Psychology1474-70492008-01-01610.1177/14747049080060010510.1177_147470490800600105The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language AcquisitionL. Kirk HagenFor the past half-century, psycholinguistic research has concerned itself with two mysteries of human cognition: (1) that children universally acquire a highly abstract, computationally complex set of linguistic rules rapidly and effortlessly, and (2) that second language acquisition (SLA) among adults is, conversely, slow, laborious, highly variable, and virtually never results in native fluency. We now have a decent, if approximate, understanding of the biological foundations of first language acquisition, thanks in large part to Lenneberg's (1964, 1984) seminal work on the critical period hypothesis. More recently, the elements of a promising theory of language and evolution have emerged as well (see e.g. Bickerton, 1981 , 1990 ; Leiberman, 1984, 1987). I argue here that the empirical foundations of an evolutionary theory of language are now solid enough to support an account of bilingualism and adult SLA as well. Specifically, I will show that evidence from the environment of evolutionary adaptation of paleolithic humans suggests that for our nomadic ancestors, the ability to master a language early in life was an eminently useful adaptation. However, the ability to acquire another language in adulthood was not, and consequently was not selected for propagation.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600105 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
L. Kirk Hagen |
spellingShingle |
L. Kirk Hagen The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition Evolutionary Psychology |
author_facet |
L. Kirk Hagen |
author_sort |
L. Kirk Hagen |
title |
The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition |
title_short |
The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition |
title_full |
The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition |
title_fullStr |
The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Bilingual Brain: Human Evolution and Second Language Acquisition |
title_sort |
bilingual brain: human evolution and second language acquisition |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Evolutionary Psychology |
issn |
1474-7049 |
publishDate |
2008-01-01 |
description |
For the past half-century, psycholinguistic research has concerned itself with two mysteries of human cognition: (1) that children universally acquire a highly abstract, computationally complex set of linguistic rules rapidly and effortlessly, and (2) that second language acquisition (SLA) among adults is, conversely, slow, laborious, highly variable, and virtually never results in native fluency. We now have a decent, if approximate, understanding of the biological foundations of first language acquisition, thanks in large part to Lenneberg's (1964, 1984) seminal work on the critical period hypothesis. More recently, the elements of a promising theory of language and evolution have emerged as well (see e.g. Bickerton, 1981 , 1990 ; Leiberman, 1984, 1987). I argue here that the empirical foundations of an evolutionary theory of language are now solid enough to support an account of bilingualism and adult SLA as well. Specifically, I will show that evidence from the environment of evolutionary adaptation of paleolithic humans suggests that for our nomadic ancestors, the ability to master a language early in life was an eminently useful adaptation. However, the ability to acquire another language in adulthood was not, and consequently was not selected for propagation. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600105 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lkirkhagen thebilingualbrainhumanevolutionandsecondlanguageacquisition AT lkirkhagen bilingualbrainhumanevolutionandsecondlanguageacquisition |
_version_ |
1724686128291774464 |