Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back

Sociological theory at any stage of development requires permanent reflection and comprehension of its own conceptual bases including its terminological axiomatic, which incorporates both the antinomy “subject (action, agency) and structure” and concepts of order, norms and rules, standards, cultura...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D G Podvoyskiy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2016-12-01
Series:RUDN journal of Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/13995
id doaj-1a90e662bfbd4ea4b46f7d5247027100
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1a90e662bfbd4ea4b46f7d52470271002020-11-24T23:48:54ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN journal of Sociology2313-22722408-88972016-12-0116346548213887Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and backD G Podvoyskiy0<p>Российский университет дружбы народов</p>Sociological theory at any stage of development requires permanent reflection and comprehension of its own conceptual bases including its terminological axiomatic, which incorporates both the antinomy “subject (action, agency) and structure” and concepts of order, norms and rules, standards, cultural patterns and values, institutions, social control, power and coercion, conformism, deviation, etc. Conceptual descriptions of the opposition “agency-structure”, the problems of social order and mechanisms of normative and institutional “morphogenesis” traditionally act as one of the main “paradigmatic” axes for the development of sociological theory, and their critical analysis and comparison clarify the general methodological basis of social knowledge as a whole and highlight the fundamental demarcation lines between different schools and branches of sociological thought. The author attempts to provide a preliminary reconstruction and revision of the general argumentation used in social theory to explain how normative orders emerge from the internal logic of social interaction that takes place at different levels including everyday life. The article aims to assist in producing a clear and prominent vision of the issues of the dualism of agency-structure in social relations and of their normative, “rule-oriented” nature.http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/13995социальные нормыструктуры»социальный контроль«нормативный» порядок общества«нормативный морфогенез»привычкиобычаисоциальные институтыследование правилуоппозиция «субъекта
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D G Podvoyskiy
spellingShingle D G Podvoyskiy
Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back
RUDN journal of Sociology
социальные нормы
структуры»
социальный контроль
«нормативный» порядок общества
«нормативный морфогенез»
привычки
обычаи
социальные институты
следование правилу
оппозиция «субъекта
author_facet D G Podvoyskiy
author_sort D G Podvoyskiy
title Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back
title_short Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back
title_full Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back
title_fullStr Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back
title_full_unstemmed Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back
title_sort normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: from individual to institutions, and back
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
series RUDN journal of Sociology
issn 2313-2272
2408-8897
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Sociological theory at any stage of development requires permanent reflection and comprehension of its own conceptual bases including its terminological axiomatic, which incorporates both the antinomy “subject (action, agency) and structure” and concepts of order, norms and rules, standards, cultural patterns and values, institutions, social control, power and coercion, conformism, deviation, etc. Conceptual descriptions of the opposition “agency-structure”, the problems of social order and mechanisms of normative and institutional “morphogenesis” traditionally act as one of the main “paradigmatic” axes for the development of sociological theory, and their critical analysis and comparison clarify the general methodological basis of social knowledge as a whole and highlight the fundamental demarcation lines between different schools and branches of sociological thought. The author attempts to provide a preliminary reconstruction and revision of the general argumentation used in social theory to explain how normative orders emerge from the internal logic of social interaction that takes place at different levels including everyday life. The article aims to assist in producing a clear and prominent vision of the issues of the dualism of agency-structure in social relations and of their normative, “rule-oriented” nature.
topic социальные нормы
структуры»
социальный контроль
«нормативный» порядок общества
«нормативный морфогенез»
привычки
обычаи
социальные институты
следование правилу
оппозиция «субъекта
url http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/13995
work_keys_str_mv AT dgpodvoyskiy normativesocialmorphogenesisandtheoppositionagencystructurefromindividualtoinstitutionsandback
_version_ 1725484082390892544