Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back
Sociological theory at any stage of development requires permanent reflection and comprehension of its own conceptual bases including its terminological axiomatic, which incorporates both the antinomy “subject (action, agency) and structure” and concepts of order, norms and rules, standards, cultura...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
2016-12-01
|
Series: | RUDN journal of Sociology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/13995 |
id |
doaj-1a90e662bfbd4ea4b46f7d5247027100 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1a90e662bfbd4ea4b46f7d52470271002020-11-24T23:48:54ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN journal of Sociology2313-22722408-88972016-12-0116346548213887Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and backD G Podvoyskiy0<p>Российский университет дружбы народов</p>Sociological theory at any stage of development requires permanent reflection and comprehension of its own conceptual bases including its terminological axiomatic, which incorporates both the antinomy “subject (action, agency) and structure” and concepts of order, norms and rules, standards, cultural patterns and values, institutions, social control, power and coercion, conformism, deviation, etc. Conceptual descriptions of the opposition “agency-structure”, the problems of social order and mechanisms of normative and institutional “morphogenesis” traditionally act as one of the main “paradigmatic” axes for the development of sociological theory, and their critical analysis and comparison clarify the general methodological basis of social knowledge as a whole and highlight the fundamental demarcation lines between different schools and branches of sociological thought. The author attempts to provide a preliminary reconstruction and revision of the general argumentation used in social theory to explain how normative orders emerge from the internal logic of social interaction that takes place at different levels including everyday life. The article aims to assist in producing a clear and prominent vision of the issues of the dualism of agency-structure in social relations and of their normative, “rule-oriented” nature.http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/13995социальные нормыструктуры»социальный контроль«нормативный» порядок общества«нормативный морфогенез»привычкиобычаисоциальные институтыследование правилуоппозиция «субъекта |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
D G Podvoyskiy |
spellingShingle |
D G Podvoyskiy Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back RUDN journal of Sociology социальные нормы структуры» социальный контроль «нормативный» порядок общества «нормативный морфогенез» привычки обычаи социальные институты следование правилу оппозиция «субъекта |
author_facet |
D G Podvoyskiy |
author_sort |
D G Podvoyskiy |
title |
Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back |
title_short |
Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back |
title_full |
Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back |
title_fullStr |
Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back |
title_full_unstemmed |
Normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: From individual to institutions, and back |
title_sort |
normative social morphogenesis and the opposition “agency-structure”: from individual to institutions, and back |
publisher |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
series |
RUDN journal of Sociology |
issn |
2313-2272 2408-8897 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Sociological theory at any stage of development requires permanent reflection and comprehension of its own conceptual bases including its terminological axiomatic, which incorporates both the antinomy “subject (action, agency) and structure” and concepts of order, norms and rules, standards, cultural patterns and values, institutions, social control, power and coercion, conformism, deviation, etc. Conceptual descriptions of the opposition “agency-structure”, the problems of social order and mechanisms of normative and institutional “morphogenesis” traditionally act as one of the main “paradigmatic” axes for the development of sociological theory, and their critical analysis and comparison clarify the general methodological basis of social knowledge as a whole and highlight the fundamental demarcation lines between different schools and branches of sociological thought. The author attempts to provide a preliminary reconstruction and revision of the general argumentation used in social theory to explain how normative orders emerge from the internal logic of social interaction that takes place at different levels including everyday life. The article aims to assist in producing a clear and prominent vision of the issues of the dualism of agency-structure in social relations and of their normative, “rule-oriented” nature. |
topic |
социальные нормы структуры» социальный контроль «нормативный» порядок общества «нормативный морфогенез» привычки обычаи социальные институты следование правилу оппозиция «субъекта |
url |
http://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/13995 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dgpodvoyskiy normativesocialmorphogenesisandtheoppositionagencystructurefromindividualtoinstitutionsandback |
_version_ |
1725484082390892544 |